4 ms·
most of it is overstated because of marketing. in fact the ban looked like an inside job by the current administration to play with the stock value. if the ban
by DyslexicAtheist 3mo ago
most of it is overstated because of marketing. in fact the ban looked like an inside job by the current administration to play with the stock value. if the ban did anything it was to make every n00b agree that Anthropic was so far ahead of its times it needed to be banned.
- nickv 3mo agoStock value?
- llm_nerd 3mo agoNot publicly traded as they haven't IPOd yet (the part where those closely held shares become publicly traded), but Anthropic does absolutely have shares, and there is a valuation on those shares. I don't quite understand how the administration is playing this, beyond the normal corrupt protection racket stuff they're doing all the time now, but Dario is absolutely gearing every public apocalyptic prediction on juicing the "stock". I mean, if the matryoshka doll rent-a-gpu farce that is SpaceX somehow is worth $2T with their garbage child porn xAI, Anthropic must be worth quadzillions.
- human305893 3mo agoI feel like I'm loosing my mind with the way people are falling for the marketing with every iteration. Is it better, sure but it's still just a LLM.
- latentsea 3mo agoThese days an LLM + a harness can one-shot playable Minecraft clones. This tech has come a long way since it was first released.
- applicative 3mo agoYou are saying: it turns out that one-shot playable Minecraft clones are actually pretty simple. Maybe it seemed a hard problem to programmers, but why not just say that the verifiable-rewards training has shown that their skill is unusually simple?
- senordevnyc 3mo agoWhat a great example of the no true Scotsman fallacy.
- latentsea 3mo agoI am saying 3 years ago there wasn't a snowballs chance in hell I could one shot a playable Minecraft clone, and there has never been a snowballs chance in hell a human developer could do so in 45 minutes. The difficulty of the task and human performance on that task hasn't changed. LLMs performance on that task has changed dramatically.
- 8note 3mo agoit could almost certainly regurgitate something like minetest its in the training data, probably many times, and it was then, too
- latentsea 3mo agoAnd that's exactly why 3 years ago we saw people one shotting it in 45 minutes :)
- staticman2 3mo ago"Some idiot on Twitter did a game tech demo" has been a thing since, like GPT 3.5 or 4.0?
- latentsea 3mo agoIt has. We can see 3.5 started with text adventure games https://medium.com/@duncanariey/using-chatgpt-to-make-the-ittiest-bittiest-text-based-adventure-game-f642e8da4dad https://medium.com/@duncanariey/using-chatgpt-to-make-the-it... and with 4.0 it moved up to pong https://x.com/skirano/status/1635736107949195278 https://x.com/skirano/status/1635736107949195278 As the generations increase, so too has the complexity of the games it can one-shot.