applicative

3 ms·

1.
by applicative 2mo ago
I had not heard of this comic masterpiece “Pfau et al. showed that a model whose chain of thought is just dots (“...”) can nonetheless … solve problems that are intractable for a model with an equivalent architecture but no chain of thought
2.
by applicative 2mo ago
I'm not sure who has the religious issue.
3.
by applicative 2mo ago
Local LLMs make my laptop hot and are wrong about everything.
4.
by applicative 2mo ago
I was missing it too. Google says it's a builtin zsh feature but mac doesn't turn it on by default, so you add these to `~/.zshrc` bindkey '^[[A' history-search-backward bindkey '^[[B' history-s
5.
by applicative 2mo ago
No one has even sued them in these rogue agent cases, have they? If not, they must be infinitely far from criminal liability. Why would we want criminal liability anyway if actual victims are made whole? Proof of it has far higher standard.
6.
by applicative 2mo ago
When the Fed ‘creates money’ or as we say ‘prints money’ it is by buying Federal bonds from banks, no? Then the bank’s account is credited and it has more reserves. It is when total accounts at Federal reserve expand that base money has ex
7.
by applicative 2mo ago
Nothing in the world is comparable to Fable. You presumably have a narrow specialized use case like programming.
8.
by applicative 2mo ago
It’s one of the only countries that reliably follows treaties. Unfortunately they are very hard to pass, which is why the agreements falsely called treaties are so easy to reverse - they are all personal executive orders like JCPOA (alas)
9.
by applicative 2mo ago
The scanning you are talking about is a direct response to court rulings on exactly these matters. The action m is legitimate and above legal criticism. Dismal as it might be it is the fruit of legal criticism. In a word, it’s your fault.
10.
by applicative 2mo ago
The topic was training. You cropped text to change it. Maybe consider integrity.
11.
by applicative 2mo ago
If you put text ‘on the internet’ you do indeed actively permit others to get it. Why lie? Were you burning down archive.org in years past? Then why lie? It is moreover established that training weights on basically anything is legitimate
12.
by applicative 2mo ago
Kimi K3 isn’t cheaper.
13.
by applicative 2mo ago
It stuns the mind that anyone can compose such a sophism.
14.
by applicative 2mo ago
It is amusing to see those trapped in extreme HAAD, the source and whole content of religious illusion, pretend that it is their opponents who are in a state of religious fantasia.
15.
by applicative 2mo ago
The living feeling thinking beings in question would have to be … data centers — not to put too fine a point in it. But these aren’t even analogous, as can seen by direct inspection.
16.
by applicative 2mo ago
In USA there is surprisingly little state involvement in the whole llm mania. Who needs the state with 800 lbs gorillas like Google, Amazon, Nvidia, etc In China, it is the principal obsession of the entire communist party which eg funds t
17.
by applicative 2mo ago
everyone knows how to type ‘cancel’ https://xcancel.com/ValerioCapraro/status/209779183626997799...
18.
by applicative 2mo ago
You get it online. I keep it around to print booklets for certain community purposes. I can set latex for A5, design the pages, then print the A5 pdf to A4 paper booklet and Tex, Mac and Brother understand with zero further brain investmen
19.
by applicative 2mo ago
huggingface stores weights and its service is replicated by /countless/ other sites. The world will not change even by one byte if it vanishes tomorrow
20.
by applicative 2mo ago
The hugging face incident had no effect on hugging face, whose service is replicated by countless sites. The descriptions of the phases of the interaction are thrilling in a way that inclines one to forget this
21.
by applicative 2mo ago
you can read it in buckmaster's document.
22.
by applicative 2mo ago
Yes, the present developments, and the present approach, mean we will not have mathematicians any more.
23.
by applicative 2mo ago
I think you can't have read the thread. The whole point is that there is no end of mathematics, an infinite sea; but the constitution of an 'open math problem' is a delicate piece of mathematical thought, at any moment a sm
24.
by applicative 2mo ago
This is desperate. They were expressly operating within a program. OpenAI isn't going to recover from this
25.
by applicative 2mo ago
except thats not what happened is it? https://cims.nyu.edu/%7Etristanb/statement.pdf
26.
by applicative 2mo ago
No, its a pure outrage. I defended OpenAI til today. I now affirm they must be totally destroyed, burned utterly to the ground.
27.
by applicative 2mo ago
This is the end of OpenAI
28.
by applicative 2mo ago
Its funny, it is uniquely with this one act that I have turned forever on OpenAI, which I hitherto defended up and down against nonsense charges. I dedicate my life to its complete destruction beginning today.
29.
by applicative 2mo ago
Their ‘open weight strategy’ was invented, to Chinas surprise, by the Western press after the DeepSeek event. Of course all the actual systems like Baidu, Bytedance are closed weight and basically all anyone uses. Meanwhile the advanced s
30.
by applicative 2mo ago
That this joker is predicting it, is proof it wont happen. The dollar ended ten years ago. Putin brought world peace and prosperity (as he bombs Aleppo). They presumably pay him to humiliate himself. https://www.ft.com/ru

More ›