6 ms·
Codeberg Is Down
- analogpixel 4mo agoI can't take it anymore, I'm moving all my projects to github!
- roscas 4mo agoIs Github free of problems? I don't know. Maybe an option would be hosting gitea and sync projects to an online account.
- m4xm4n 4mo agoI believe analogpixel is being facetious
- cinntaile 4mo agoThe GP is joking.
- loloquwowndueo 4mo agoSarcasm is a thing.
- CoastalCoder 4mo agoSounds like we have the basics of an oscillating system now! I wonder what it's resonant frequency is.
- roscas 4mo agohttps://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg "Power Outage Since Sunday 00:18 CEST, Codeberg.org is offline. From our investigation, our primary location lost power in our racks, leaving the majority of our servers and some network switches offline. We're waiting for a fix from the datacenter operator. " from that status page.
- muglug 4mo agoMaybe related to the heatwave? I've heard some European data centres are having trouble with their cooling systems.
- matt_daemon 4mo ago> For the time being, it appears that all three servers are without power. This strikes me as odd, only three servers?
- stackskipton 4mo ago3 physical servers can power a ton of requests.
- arcanemachiner 4mo agoFrom what I understand, Codeberg is a pretty small nonprofit group.
- nasretdinov 4mo agoCodeberg is smaller than GitHub and, you know, Go is slightly more efficient than Ruby :)
- Gualdrapo 4mo ago[dead]
- DarkNova6 4mo agoA large chunk of companies I've worked for or consulted for had their own on-prem Gitlab. I think they chose correctly.
- veber-alex 4mo agoOn perm Gitlab has a ton of problems too.
- DarkNova6 4mo agoFor examples? Never ran into them myself but I don't do ops.
- veber-alex 4mo agoI don't do ops myself so I don't know the exact details but sometimes Gitlab is down or there are strange issues with CI/CD breaking.
- Kelteseth 4mo agoWe had zero in the last 7 years. But we are only a small team of 8.
- neilv 4mo agoCodeberg runs open source Forgejo, and you could on-prem that too (for no license cost), if it suits your needs. GitLab is more powerful in some ways, but early startups might want to look at Forgejo first.
- assimpleaspossi 4mo agoNever heard of it. And it makes HN?
- veber-alex 4mo agoThere are a couple of very vocal people who are generally liked here who wrote angry blog posts about moving from Github to Codeberg. This is why it's getting traction.
- velcrovan 4mo agoConsider that maybe you haven’t heard of all the things that HN readers find interesting.
- assimpleaspossi 4mo agoI am VERY active in technology and that I haven't heard of it means something, too. I notice--far too often--that obscure things like this get posted here and elsewhere which can confuse others into thinking they have to get involved or learn about it cause they saw it on <this site> so they have to learn it, too, when it's only a niche case among few.
- NekkoDroid 4mo agoI see it mentioned any time GitHub is shitting the bed (frequent enough) and someone asks for self hostable alternatives or when someone ask for a European GitHub alternative. I think you just might not be paying enough attention.
- velcrovan 4mo agoAgain, Codeberg isn’t obscure. Worrying about front page HN links “confusing” others because you haven’t heard of something is about the silliest thing I have read on this site.
- linzhangrun 4mo agoOnly well known project on Codeberg that comes to mind is Zig
- DarkNova6 4mo agoThat's because most of what you can see of a Codeberg is actually underwater.
- doubled112 4mo agoDoes Forgejo count?
- jraph 4mo agoComaps too.
- iamnothere 4mo agoGuix?
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- kevinfiol 4mo agoHas anyone used the Repository Mirroring Feature [1] to mirror repos across self-hosted Forgejo/Codeberg/Github? How effortless is it? Ideally, I'd like to only ever push repos/branches to my self-hosted Forgejo, and have those changes automatically reflected on Codeberg/GH without thinking about it. [1] https://forgejo.org/docs/v15.0/user/repo-mirror/ https://forgejo.org/docs/v15.0/user/repo-mirror/
- melomac 4mo agoI am using it to backup my public and private repositories to Github and it's effortless, indeed. I am using ssh protocol and a read/write deployment key. Also, I anticipated `git push --force` could be an issue, it's not.
- TranquilMarmot 4mo agoI use it to sync projects that I mainly host on Codeberg up to GitHub. It was a "set it and forget it" kind of thing.
- acedTrex 4mo agoThis is exactly what i do, its very easy. I mirror across codeberg, github and a local forge instance
- Ferret7446 4mo agoI suppose this is a good opportunity to ask, why do people get so affected by DVCS hosts going down? You can work locally with Git without uploading every change. Despite the constant reported GitHub downtime, I have not ever been adversely affected even once, since pushing and pulling are done every few days and I can freely branch/commit/merge locally.
- ItsHarper 4mo agoDo you not spend much time writing and discussing issues or reviewing code?
- scared_together 4mo agoYou could use separate tools for those tasks. JIRA/Bugzilla/etc. for issue tracking, Sublime Merge or equivalent for comparing a dev branch to a main branch, and CI/CD with Azure Pipelines or whatever the “modern” equivalent of Jenkins is. That isn’t as convenient as an all-in-one tool, and might not be what the user you’re responding to is doing. But it’s doable.
- doodlesdev 4mo agoNowadays, these code forges have also become a centralized place for issue tracking, kanban boards, wiki editing and, specially, as CI/CD servers, in the case of GitHub Actions, which are, sometimes, the only for you to deploy software to package repositories. The same limitations apply to GitLab CI or Codeberg's Forgejo Runners/Woodpecker. Whenever GitLab, Codeberg, BitBucket and, mostly, GitHub goes down, a lot of the software and websites you use can't be updated, including dependencies of your software that you're pulling from npm, for instance. Finally, companies use code forges mostly for the ease of doing code reviews through Pull Requests/Merge Requests. Developers rarely, if ever, actually merge branches locally, before having it reviewed by peers in one of these code forges.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- crossroadsguy 4mo agoI have always wondered why don't they charge at least based on storage or so? Maybe above a basic/generous tier? I mean if I'd love to pay a few USD a year for say a few tiny repos that no uses other than me, and a static landing page (like Github Pages) that no one visits except me (every few months; maybe a recruiter or two, though I seriously doubt that). I'd rather pay a place like Codeberg than Github. From latter for such basic offerings I'd expect free services, yup! (Because I already pay them in other ways, like my data and all that.. but that's really beside the point). As for funding or becoming a member, I am not there yet and also that is not regular enough for me, that is not streamlined for me personally. How… why… what? Let's say it's like.. well… I don't know.. anyway.. people (esp. from USA), please don't be offended (discussion on this topic has felt like we are from different planets), I'd rather pay a simple restaurant bill where 2Y tip is mandatorily part of the bill than a Y tip that I would "leave at the table" or "drop in a tip jar" or "generously" "hand it" (or slip it) to the staff. I have lots of problems with the latter but let's not get into that here anyway.