16 ms·

Thinking of Selling on eBay using Paypal? Think Again

• psycho 14y ago
  Don't read TechCrunch, don't sell on Ebay, think twice about Apple... Today's HN headlines make me a bit depressed... :(
• popsolete 14y ago
  Social Engineering adapted for Paypal scamming. This is yet another proof of that Paypal Seller Protection is basically worthless.
• pavel_lishin 14y ago
  While I'm sure that there are probably thousands, if not tens-of- and hundres-of, perfectly happy and valid sales of high-value electronics on eBay every day using Paypal, I would rather give something like that away as a Christmas present than try to sell it on eBay.
• nicholassmith 14y ago
  Note, I think PayPal are in many cases some sly devils doing some nasty things, in this case it sounds like they went to bat, had the credit companies say 'nope' and that's that. Credit card companies will usually go in the favour of the buyer, because technically the buyer is them. This is an odd, and bizarre situation, but its why you always should buy fancy items on credit cards, as the credit companies don't like their money being mucked about with. The situation is heavily broken though, scammers on every side, the only option becomes taking legal action and that's very much a minefield.
  • lh7777 14y ago
    Seller Protection should protect the seller in the case of obvious fraud like this regardless of what the credit card company says.
    • nicholassmith 14y ago
      Definitely, it seems super obvious to us that fraud has occurred and that's the long and short, to the credit card companies all they can see is that they might be severely out of pocket. They will generally fight back against it, and side with their money. It sucks.
      • jeremyjh 14y ago
        I doubt Paypal presented any of the evidence provided by the OP.
• UnFundedHype 14y ago
  I'm stuck with $680 in chargebacks on paypal. One gamer used a bank account to deposit funds into his account. 2-3 months later, he uses that same bank account, then files a chargeback for $680. Even though he'd used that same bank account months earlier, on the same site without filing a chargeback somehow this time around he won the chargeback dispute. I have no idea how that is common sense possible
• mibbitier 14y ago
  > " If youre thinking of selling an expensive item on eBay, think again. " I would say, this type of fraud is exclusively targeted at cellphones, ipods, netbooks etc. If you're selling something like an antique grandfather clock, you should be fine. Of course anything that requires collection, or couriering is going to be more traceable and secure. I have sold hundreds or maybe thousands of items on eBay. The only one I ever had a problem with was trying to sell an old iPod. As soon as it was listed the scamming started by fraudsters.
  • tb303 14y ago
    It's just that the scamming is more common with iPhones. There are many public cases where the similar scam was pulled as the buyer returned an "item not as described" as an empty guitar case full of rocks/synth box full of books/etc.
  • AjithAntony 14y ago
    >If you're selling something like an antique grandfather clock, you should be fine. Paypal orders buyer to destroy antique violin: http://www.regretsy.com/2012/01/03/from-the-mailbag-27/ http://www.regretsy.com/2012/01/03/from-the-mailbag-27/
    • mibbitier 14y ago
      One bad incident out of millions doesn't set a precedent.
      • chiph 14y ago
        One could say the same thing about OP's post. Yet, it isn't unique by a long shot. I've also given up on selling via CL because of the scammers. Now I donate to the local Goodwill or other charity (women's shelters want cellphones, for example), and take the tax write-off.
        • 18pfsmt 14y ago
          Could explain how buyers could scam you using Craigslist? Just make it cash only, no?
• headShrinker 14y ago
  Being the grinch that I am, I stopped giving any feedback at all for buying or selling on eBay. The principal being if anything ever goes wrong, feedback is your only weapon.
  • Kliment 14y ago
    After a seller started harrassing me by telephone after I gave them neutral feedback for shipping crap (not negative because they did refund me after I sent it back) I stopped giving feedback altogether. Never again. I avoid ebay altogether now for anything of value, and avoid paypal for everything.
  • zobzu 14y ago
    I do the same. Sometimes sellers harass me to put feedback tho. I filter it, but still, interesting.
• smadam9 14y ago
  I thought my case with a virtual product, and a clear fraudulent act was bad. After hearing about this, with a physical product, it makes a local electronics dealer seem much more appealing.
  • pavel_lishin 14y ago
    The only way I would sell an expensive piece of electronics would be via local Craigslist, in person, probably for cash that I'd prefer to witness the buyer withdraw out of an ATM.
    • lh7777 14y ago
      Just like anything else, selling in person to a stranger is not without risk either. I wonder how the frequency of robberies associated with Craigslist sales compares against eBay fraud like this one. Personally, I'd rather get hit with a chargeback than a baseball bat.
      • pavel_lishin 14y ago
        Sure, but I wouldn't ask the buyer to come to my house at 2 in the morning, nor would I agree to meet him in that alley behind the biker bar, either.
    • jack-r-abbit 14y ago
      I'm curious why you think you should see the buyer actually withdraw from an ATM? If I was a buyer and the seller asked to follow me to my ATM, I'd be concerned.
      • pavel_lishin 14y ago
        I actually probably wouldn't do that, but it would be a pretty good hedge against receiving counterfeit currency.
        • jack-r-abbit 14y ago
• larsberg 14y ago
  To jump on a point totally unrelated to the post's complaint but related to selling smartphones, I've found that if I'm selling electronics (especially generation-behind iPhones for the family) I can do much better than eBay, even before you discount both their listing fee and paypal use fees. And there's comparatively no risk. For cash: gazelle For slightly more cash (usually just a few percent), in the form of a gift card: amazon trade-ins
  • DanBlake 14y ago
    Gazelle is worthless and preys on the poor and uneducated. You get less than 50% what you would from selling on ebay. http://www.gazelle.com/iphone/iphone-4s/at-t/iphone-4s-64gb-at-t-or-unlocked/480695-gpid http://www.gazelle.com/iphone/iphone-4s/at-t/iphone-4s-64gb-... vs http://www.ebay.com/sch/Cell-Phones-Smartphones-/9355/i.html?Storage%2520Capacity=64%2520GB&Color=White&Carrier=AT%2526T&_from=R40&Model=iPhone%25204S&LH_Complete=1&_dmpt=Cell_Phones&_nkw=iPhone%204S&_sop=13 http://www.ebay.com/sch/Cell-Phones-Smartphones-/9355/i.html...
    • bryne 14y ago
      Which in this case is zero, because eBay is rife with scammers preying on the *well-educated? Gazelle and Amazon present almost zero risk to the seller, hence the price differential.
      • DanBlake 14y ago
        The chance of getting scammed like this on eBay is less than 2% (maximum chargeback rate) Hence you are better selling 100 iPhones on eBay and taking the hit for two then sell all 100 on gazelle and not.
        • deleted 14y ago
          [deleted]
        • jessedhillon 14y ago
          That's not quite genuine. You need to look at probability of a scammer winning your auction, not the probability that a scammer still has room under his/her chargeback cap. And even after that, I somehow doubt that those statistics are satisfying to the person who lost 100% of their money after selling 100% of their phone inventory (one phone).
• brk 14y ago
  I stopped selling things like this on eBay a long time ago because I do not sell things frequently enough to keep up with the scams du jour. My local craigslist is where my for-sale items now go. Sure, I may get a little less than top-dollar for an item, or it might take a little longer to sell, but I'm never left with some after-the-fact dispute where I have no control (note: I'll only accept cash). eBay was fun while it lasted, but then it became a giant flea market with basically semi-pro retailers looking to sell things, and a whole bunch of random scammers. Intermixed in all that was the occasional legitimate "amateur" seller. For the very few times I've purchased something on Ebay in the last few years, it's always been from "pro" sellers with storefront type setups. The hassles of dealing with amateurs selling poorly described items, taking too long to ship, etc. was also not worth the "deal" I was getting. A true "amateur to amateur" auction type sales website is an area begging for competition...
  • kerryfalk 14y ago
    Shameless plug; we've built one for automotive enthusiasts: https://www.styckyd.com https://www.styckyd.com Our target is to serve the C2C market and make shipping less painless as well as eliminate some of the risk on the buyer's side. With the current climate for buying goods online companies serving the space are at risk for opening themselves up to scams like this one by buyers. The reality for anyone accepting credit cards is that you're at the mercy of the buyer.
    • JoblessWonder 14y ago
      Secure Tading? Is that a typo or something I'm not familiar with?
    • jaredsohn 14y ago
      What's the value prop for "make shipping less painless"? :)
      • kerryfalk 14y ago
        Because we're targeting consumers, they're less familiar with shipping than businesses. Our system provides buyers with accurate shipping costs and prepares labels for sellers when their parts have been purchased. All they have to do is put it in a box and drop the package off. This also means that we can eventually grow each seller's addressable market within our system as we'll handle cross-border shipping on their behalf.
• eli 14y ago
  A few years ago I sold an Android phone on eBay. A scammer bought it, claimed it was broken, and filed a claim with PayPal. The guy sent me back a different phone of the same model that was indeed quite broken. I appealed to PayPal and lost. I got screwed in this case, but frankly I'm not sure what PayPal/eBay is supposed to do about this sort of scam. Dude even swapped the sticker with the serial number from inside the case.
  • haberman 14y ago
    Out of curiosity, if the sticker was the same how did you know for certain that the broken phone was a different phone?
    • eli 14y ago
      Mine had a small but distinctive scratch on the back. The sticker was also off-center and poorly applied. Though I did briefly question my sanity. I suppose I don't know for certain, though the phone was working when I mailed it. The buyer's profile showed he was frequently buying and selling cell phones, both working and broken.
  • agumonkey 14y ago
    It's hard, as a paranoid person I try to document things as much as I can, filmed tests, clean pictures, filmed packaging process. It's not perfect but for what it's worth, I had an issue on priceminister (european website) involving an old motherboard being flagged as failing by the buyer, they were thorough and rejected his claims after all. Nothing major it was 20$, but it's good to see that some websites go the other way too.
    • kamjam 14y ago
      I'm the same. I sold a few things on eBay a few months ago, nothing of great value, some old Nokia 8850's I had lying around and 2 Raspberry Pi's I had purchased but not used. I photographed everything, against a verifiable backdrop (in this the BBC website on my monitor) and filmed the product in use and put it up on Photobucket so that the upload was also time stamped. No problems whatsoever with the sales, but you know, just in case!
• meritt 14y ago
  Stop using eBay and Paypal. If you look, you can find stories like this every week since about 1999. This sort of behavior isn't new yet eBay continues to grow.
  • VMG 14y ago
    Because it works for most people most of the time. That is why I continue to use eBay as a buyer.
    • dreoe 14y ago
      Especially for sellers with thousands of sales. They would get no benefit from scamming you even if they could because bad feedback = lots of lost sales.
• DigitalJack 14y ago
  This seems like a credit card/bank problem, it's not unique to paypal. I was thinking about upgrading my phone and ebaying the old one. After reading this, I'm thinking maybe I'll go the craigslist route, or one of the online trade-in deals. Does gazelle have this same issue? I'm not sure if Gazelle the company buys the product and sells it, or if they just connect me with a buyer like ebay does.
  • mikeevans 14y ago
    You could try Swappa (http://swappa.com/ http://swappa.com/) I haven't used them personally, but a friend did and had positive feedback.
    • pdubs 14y ago
      Swappa's great, but it still goes through Paypal. Probably a better crowd on there than EBay though and they allow negative feedback.
    • what_ever 14y ago
      Another vote for Swappa. I bought a phone using the service. As pdubs said, it still goes through PayPal but the site employees keep an eye on the transactions and there are reviews and negative feedback.
  • cynwoody 14y ago
    I just looked up an iPhone 4s 32gb unlocked. Gazelle offers about $215. Swappa.com had six for sale, with asking prices averaging around $450 (there was an outlier at $360). A quick look at Craigslist Boston shows recent asking prices of $380 to $550. Of course, I don't have data on what prices the Swappa and Craigslist sellers are actually getting. I think, if I were really lazy, I'd sell to Gazelle. Otherwise, I would use Craigslist, cash only, meet in a public place.
• joaorj 14y ago
  Everyone who's been in the internet for a long time know that there are dozens of sites for people to go tell their "got screwed by paypal" stories. Why paypal has always been the most used site for online transactions? That i don't know.. I know i would never use it.
  • tjr 14y ago
    Maybe because people who have bad experiences tend to want to publish them more than people who have good experiences. I sold a damaged iPhone 4 (listed as such) on eBay+Paypal earlier this year. I got paid, the buyer was happy, and I did not write a blog post about it.
    • codenerdz 14y ago
      Im with you, i sold a number of things without problems, but I did it assuming that if I follow the rules of Paypals Seller Protection, i would be covered. This is not the case here. I now know that Seller Protection means nothing to the fraudster in the know
    • chris_wot 14y ago
      Seems to me that those good xperience come down to old fashioned luck. Don't use PayPal or eBay - simple!
• DanBlake 14y ago
  Heres the issue (and a opportunity for a startup?) - eBay remains the main place to sell second hand goods. There are other options (craigslist, amazon) but the fact is it takes longer to sell and still flush with scammers. What does the solution look like? A costco style paid membership with more information given back to the user? Ability to 'vouch' for yourself via facebook/twitter/etc. ? With all of this, its still chicken and the egg. Hard problem to solve.
  • coopdog 14y ago
    Bitcoins (no chargebacks) and a preference for buying through friends of friends on social networks (almost like a darknet) could be worth looking into.
    • Karunamon 14y ago
      Bitcoins tip the pendulum too far in the other direction; there needs to be a way for a buyer scammed to reclaim their money in the case of a seller scam. (And that's not even getting into the instability of the currency.. I'm a fan of bitcoin and I can't imagine using it in a serious enterprise) A third party escrow service that examines all goods for compliance with their description and then sends them on could be a useful tool..
• agumonkey 14y ago
  No group action possible ? such a pattern can't be left unprotected ...
  • Vivtek 14y ago
    Have you seen the updated PayPal terms of service? Claims to group actions are automatically relinquished.
    • agumonkey 14y ago
      Nope, as lame as it is, I didn't read them and I find this rule very surprising.
• URSpider94 14y ago
  Have you called an attorney? If you have one that you're on any kind of friendly basis, I've generally found that you can get a quick read on your case (30 minutes' worth of time) without any cost. IANAL -- first and foremost -- but I would think the best tactic may be to go after PayPal to get them to discharge your supposed debt to them, given that you've already swept the money out. Their seller's assurance contract terms would seem to be vague around what is required for the item to be determined "not as received" -- also, as you mention, there is a a pattern on behalf of the seller -- is EBay/Paypal acting dilligently to protect your interest in return for your seller's fees and auction fees?
  • jliptzin 14y ago
    LOL! What attorney would give a crap about a $500 phone? The sad truth is that in this system of ours, you can screw someone for up to $50-100k and get away with it because that's the minimum potential damages amount that would pique a decent attorney's interest.
    • CamperBob2 14y ago
      What attorney would give a crap about a $500 phone? A class-action attorney?
      • NoPiece 14y ago
        The attorney will make millions, the guy will walk away with a coupon for 5% of his next Ebay purchase. There has been some success recently in suing corporations in small claims court. There is an argument that a genreal delivery address should not have been 'verified'.
        • Karunamon 14y ago
          Class action suits are less about getting restitution and more about forming a large enough clue-by-four to beat misbehaving companies with
        • 14y ago
• Spooky23 14y ago
  That's a variant of one of the oldest scams in the book on EBay. Removing seller feedback actually fixed the issue, at least for buyers. Back in the day, the formula for an EBay sell-side scammer was to: 1 - Setup a phony account, or network of accounts. 2 - start selling small value things to each other. (Postcards, keychains, digital pictures, etc) Leave positive feedback, including nonsensical feedback (ie. My laptop works great, A++++ for a $0.99 recipie). 3 - Wait a few months for the active links to the auctions to be de-activated by EBay 4 - Start selling a dozen high-value items like laptops. Ship nothing or empty boxes. 5 - Withdraw funds asap. Now the same scheme works, but only in reverse for high-value items that have immediate cash value. Solution: Never use EBay for anything.
  • rorrr 14y ago
    Ebay works great for buyers now, it just sucks for sellers. I buy on Ebay all the time, you can find all kinds of things there really cheap.
    • ZoFreX 14y ago
      Have you ever tried to get your money back after getting scammed as a buyer?
      • Zircom 14y ago
        Several times, and for each and every one it was as easy as filing a complaint and having the money refunded to my paypal within a few days.
      • pdubs 14y ago
        I ended up getting a knockoff XBOX game and it was pretty painless to get it refunded from ebay.
      • jakejake 14y ago
        "Item not as described" is the secret passphrase. Seller has absolutely no recourse. I've never tried it as a buyer, but as a seller it's been 100% effective in the scammer getting their money back from me.
• Osmium 14y ago
  This would only work in major cities, but I always thought there was a business in having a physical escrow service aimed specifically at selling small, high-value items. You sell an item online, deposit it with the company (who takes a small cut; you could even mail it to them), who then pass it on to the buyer when payment is confirmed. The company can confirm it's in working order, and take some photographs for proof. Much more pleasant for both buyer and seller. No more news stories of people getting mugged after an online ad, no more scammy eBay purchasers, the lot.
  • Anechoic 14y ago
    This would be a great value-added service option for the Post Office. Deposit money in an account, have it shipped to a local post office, postal worker witnesses the acceptance and opening of the package, if everything is kosher, the buyer signs a release and the money is leased to the seller. USPS already provide "witness" services for packages that are picked (for free!), just add an escrow account for 1 to 5%.
    • amalag 14y ago
      Still doesn't help you, which postal employee is going to sit for 1/2 hour while you test your iphone and make sure it connects to your computer etc? They can only say, "yup it looks like an iphone", not whether or not it works.
      • ianferrel 14y ago
        Most things can be tested pretty easily and quickly. This would reduce fraud considerably, since you'd have to come up with an item that would pass a cursory inspection, but still fail later. Not at all easy to do.
  • otterley 14y ago
    escrow.com does exactly that.
    • 14y ago
• codenerdz 14y ago
  OP here. Interestingly enough, my conversations with Paypal became more and more surreal and I felt more and more powerless with every one in the end. I had a trail of information and there was evidence of multiple fraud, but I never felt as powerless as I did after my phone calls with Paypal. I am in contact with the police captain in the small town where the item was shipped, but I have very little faith in their ability to recover it. I will file a local police report as well and try to appeal with paypal. Meanwhile i want everyone to be aware that the so-called Seller Protection is totally worthless, since thats how Paypal chooses to pursue a legit fraud case.
  • DannyBee 14y ago
    If you really want the money back, sue the guy. File a miscellaneous action in Ohio and then use subpoenas to acquire his real address/billing info. Contact the state AG and local federal AG's as well, just for kicks. Note that if you go to file a small claims action, you will actually have to be present in Ohio. They require in-personam jurisdiction. (You do have the option of filing in local federal district court against the person, but this is very expensive)
    • jellicle 14y ago
      Poster can file suit in his local small claims court, and then enforce the judgement in Ohio afterwards. No need to travel to Ohio to file the suit.
    • tb303 14y ago
      You can't sue a fake identity
      • DannyBee 14y ago
        Actually, you can (John Doe lawsuits). Besides that, most of these scams are not that sophisticated as you see in spy movies. You subpoena a few folks, and you get the identity. It usually turns out to be a 16 year old, but you still get it.
• reddit_clone 14y ago
  When the buyer made the chargeback, why isn't he forced to return the item? Isn't this the obvious step that is missing from the whole equation?
  • codenerdz 14y ago
    No he was not. He went straight to his credit card and they took his side. I had no chance of appealing because Paypal would not disclose the Credit Card issuer contact info to me so that I could contact them directly
    • pdonis 14y ago
      He went straight to his credit card and they took his side. Took his side as far as the chargeback, OK, I can see that. It's not very encouraging, but I can see it. But took his side as far as keeping the item and getting his money back? That I don't see at all. How is that possible? And how would PayPal, and eBay for that matter, not expect a return?
      • chockablock 14y ago
        What's to stop buyer from claiming the box contained a pair of old headphones ('significantly not as described')? The problem is the buyer is being taken at their word; forcing a return of bogus items won't help.
        • pdonis 14y ago
          Yes, I can see that being an issue, and as a seller, you would want to somehow document what was actually shipped, otherwise the buyer could indeed ship back a bogus item. But to not even raise the question of a return at all? That doesn't make sense to me.
          • davotoula 14y ago
            You would have the opposite problem. Even if the buyer sent back the original item, the seller could always claim that he received just a brick. It's all just borked, pretty scary selling any one of items on ebay once you realise this :-(
• DanBC 14y ago
  Did Ebay / Paypal forward the fraud information onto the bank? Did the police do anything? It really sucks that the seller took the hit. Who should? The credit card companies? The banks of the scammers?
  • codenerdz 14y ago
    Credit cards and Paypals both take a piece of a transaction fee and creating an illusion of a safety net is cost of doing business to them. Paypal has a much better chance of having direct contacts with fraud departments of other institutions than individuals do, so they should take it upon themselves to sort it out. Of course Im not being objective here, but their Seller Protection wording could be a lot more forthcoming in communicating the lack of protection for this case.
  • ISL 14y ago
    The scammer should take the hit.
• UnFundedHype 14y ago
  The whole tech culture is also to blame. I'm sure there have been a LOT of great alternate ebay, paypal start ups who just didn't get traction. Bloggers won't talk about you if you haven't raised a million and you won't get much traction on google without bloggers or spending major bucks. My Dreamybids.com site for example, is an awesome service that uses the quibids model. It allows anyone to host their own auctions for products or services. Meaning a graphic designer could auction $200 of services. 10 people pay $20 to participate in the auction, one person wins and gets $200 of graphic design for $20. Good luck getting traction with that if you aren't in the tech crunch, mashables, stanford, in club.
  • lumberjack 14y ago
    >10 people pay $20 to participate in the auction That doesn't seem like an auction and to be honest I don't really like the idea either.
    • UnFundedHype 14y ago
      Then you are part of the innovation problem. You could be the one auctioning a service instead.
      • paupino_masano 14y ago
        It doesn't really sound like an auction - more like a raffle. i.e. If 10 people pay $20 but only one wins it... I actually looked at making a site like this for selling my house a couple of years ago. Fortunately I did some analysis before building it as in NZ it came under the gambling commission rules. This meant that I could only build a site like this if I donated all the proceeds to charity - unfortunately that was against what I was trying to achieve so never went through with it.
  • TheAmazingIdiot 14y ago
    Quibids is one of the scammy-iest "auction" site abound. It's name is called Penny-Scam Auction The gist for those that do now know: you buy bid-packs. A bid costs .60$, per BID. This doesn't matter if you "win" the item. If you do "win" (gamification abound), then you pay what the bid was brought up to. The other scam-note is that bids increase usually by $.01 so you see shit like "XYZ WON AN IPAD FOR 2.73$ !!!". While in reality, the "winner" pays $2.73+$40 in bids, along with everyone else to get the permission to bid. If you type in quibids in google, the top auto-fill is SCAM. Just go look it up. Btw UnFundedHype: I hope your scam of a business fails, and fails hard. You know better than this shit.
• discountgenius 14y ago
  This article goes into my "arguments for Bitcoin" pile. More sellers need to recognize the risks involved in doing transactions through PayPal/any other credit card processor and protect themselves.
  • UnFundedHype 14y ago
    There just needs to be an easier way to buy bitcoins. I added it to my gamerholic site and a couple users were just confused on where they can buy coins. You have to click one link after another.
    • yebyen 14y ago
      No, the current ecosystem of Bitcoin is just fine. You have to click one link after another because you just don't _know_ anybody who has bitcoins. One day you will get robbed by one of these exchanges, and you will blame bitcoins (or the bad man) and swear to never work with Bitcoins again. But they will be just one link in a chain of exchanges that you've trusted each one, hundreds of times, to bring you music and movies for bitcash, and nobody will write an article about it. I am a small volume user but I have never been scammed by anybody in Bitcoin, except for that Bitscalper fellow.
      • UnFundedHype 14y ago
        So what's the quickest and easiest way to buy bitcoins?
        • haakon 14y ago
          It depends on where in the world you are. http://howdoyoubuybitcoins.com/ http://howdoyoubuybitcoins.com/ may be helpful.
        • yebyen 14y ago
          I'd vote mtgox, but they actually require to see your voter registration to allow trading into US dollars, my local currency, and I haven't furnished it. As well as state issued photo ident. You can buy them from me! I will accept either document as authentic proof, otherwise in #bitcoin-OTC on Irc.free node.net they are rather partial to the Gpg key as the mode for proving identity and tracking of scammers. Don't you want to upgrade your currency, to the one where charge backs can not ever be issued against you, and its the whole world and science that keeps your money safe from hackers?
• haberman 14y ago
  Don't know if they're any good but the Economist just wrote up EcoATM (http://www.ecoatm.com/ http://www.ecoatm.com/) which lets you sell used phones at kiosks. You show up with your used phone and put it into the machine, which can apparently verify its make/model and condition, and lets a network of buyers instantly bid on it. If you choose to sell, the kiosk keeps your phone and you leave with cash.
  • peteretep 14y ago
    In the UK, I'd recommend: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/phones/mobile-recycling http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/phones/mobile-recycling Which will link you to a whole bunch of reputable bricks and mortar companies who'll buy your old phone.
• prof_hobart 14y ago
  Meanwhile, as a purchaser on Paypal, you only get 45 days after the day of the transaction - which caught us out last week. We ordered some stuff from (at least theoretically) a reputable company. We had to pay about 2 months ago, but kept getting emails telling us that the stock hadn't arrived yet and to just be patient. Then a couple of weeks ago, they told us that they actualy didn't have the stock and that we'd have to get a refund. But they were refusing to respond to any of our requests for the refund, so we contacted Paypal and they told us that we'd missed out on the 45 day window and they couldn't help us. The company we ordered from eventually (after over a week of chasing) paid up, but if they hadn't we would have been left high and dry by Paypal.
  • cynwoody 14y ago
    I pay for stuff once in a while on PayPal. However, I do not maintain a cash balance with them, nor do I have a linked bank account. I have only my American Express card linked to my account. A few years ago, I ordered some dirt cheap magazine subscriptions on eBay. I had done the same on eBay once before without a problem, but that was before the scamsters caught on. You see, there is an inherent vulnerability with magazine subscriptions: they are not expected to start serving until approximately eight weeks after you order them. That's plenty of time for you to give positive feedback and a crooked seller to make more sales. It's also beyond that 45-day window you mention. In the event, a couple of months passed. No magazines. I checked the magazine subscriber service sites and found that no subscriptions had been entered for me. I had paid on PayPal, via my American Express card. The action I took was to dispute the charge on the Amex website. It didn't occur to me take up the matter with PayPal first, so I didn't run into the problem you had. In any case, the chargeback was resolved in my favor. Not long after that, eBay stopped allowing subscription sales on their site.
  • ssimpson 14y ago
    This happened to me. I ordered something, it took time to build and then by the time i figured out something was up i was out my cash. paypal wouldn't do anything. still trying to get it back over a year later.
• steve8918 14y ago
  The only logical conclusion that can be made from eBay's and Paypal's policies is that they no longer want small sellers to use them. They want professional sellers to sell from their site, people who are used to dealing with chargebacks, etc, and can foot the bill when it comes to chargebacks/fraud. They want to facilitate BUYING from regular people, but make SELLING by regular people very difficult. There is no other explanation for getting rid of buyer reputation and providing no protection to sellers. They only want people who don't care about buyer reputation, and have deep enough pockets and the expectation that chargebacks and fraud will occur. If they deal with these larger customers, this increases their selling volume (and fees) and decreases their support costs.
  • tlogan 14y ago
    Of course. If you look their website now and their SEC filings, it is clear that eBay is not any more "garage sales on internet with auctions". It is more like discount store. Are there any of YC companies building "garage sales on internet"?
    • angryasian 14y ago
      just wondering how would you expect or how do other companies currently avoid fraud. The costs associated or added with constantly investigating fraud would almost seem like a deterrent in making a system useful.
      • steve8918 14y ago
        If you look at Paypal's 10-K, they assume an automatic writeoff 4% of their revenues due to losses from chargebacks.
        • hkmurakami 14y ago
          Almost seems like Paypal is making an effort to transfer that cost from their books to sellers.
      • 14y ago
• amalag 14y ago
  The limiting factor is the buyer's reputation with his credit card company. If he is repeatedly doing chargebacks people hopefully a credit card company will notice and not take his side or better yet, not issue him credit. The idea is that credit card companies also do not want to have this person as a customer, and probably this is a new scam he dreamed up, not an ongoing one.
  • dangrossman 14y ago
    Why would the credit card issuer not want that customer? Each time he issues a chargeback, they're getting paid a chargeback fee by the merchant (PayPal). It could even be profitable for the bank.
• tjbiddle 14y ago
  PayPal screwing over their users? That's new! In all seriousness though, PayPal does need to get their act together. I've lost easily lost a few hundred through various transactions over the past couple years because of things like this - But there are so few options that are available to the mass public that it's hard to move away from them as a seller.
• colbyaley 14y ago
  The same thing happens to me the other day with a "item not as described" claim. Fortunately, the item was of much less value. Still pissed me off.
  • Florin_Andrei 14y ago
    What was the item?
• tb303 14y ago
  Vlad, I had a similar thing happen last year with an iPad. I even went through a complaint with the Better Business Bureau, and appealed it, but PayPal is able to hide behind their fine print. I think the only way to protect ourselves from this is to limit the accounts to which our PayPal accounts are linked. They automatically-deducted $900 from my bank account upon the charge reversal, and I was unable to prevent this. By the time you get Paypal's resolution, the scammer is long gone and local law enforcement will tell you it's already gone. This whole situation is monopolistic and I don't understand why the FTC is not doing anything about it. (also posted as a comment on your essay)
• eminkel 14y ago
  It would be interesting to contrast the same policies for other similar services (ex. Amazon Marketplace). Sorry you're out that much money because of scam.
• amalag 14y ago
  It's a tough problem, but without a third party to monitor the transaction there can always be scams when it's your word against his.
• vampirechicken 14y ago
  I think the Consumerist would love to run a piece about PayPal facilitating mail fraud. You should tell them your story.
• amalag 14y ago
  It is a problem when you consider a buyer has usually 6 months to do a chargeback and you have 60 days to leave feedback and cannot change it later.
• ggordan 14y ago
  Interesting read. I had no idea about this scam and it appears I am right in the middle of one. Mind you, the item I sold is nowhere near as expensive. Lesson learned though, and I wont be using eBay any time soon.
• Apreche 14y ago
  If this happened to me, small claims court.
  • DannyBee 14y ago
    Small claims court requires you to be physically present in almost all states. You also have to sue in the state they reside, not where you reside (there are a few exceptions, none of which are remotely applicable here) He may be able to pull off filing remotely with a few friends, but at some point he's going to have to fly/drive to ohio and show up, have a place to stay, etc.
• axusgrad 14y ago
  I did recently buy some old equipment for ~$250 on ebay from an amateur seller. I'm not sure what eBay can do, except charge higher fees and provide some insurance.
• Shalle 14y ago
  Paypal is the most fraudulent company that I've done business with. There for I never sell anything anymore using it, purchase is ok but also risky. A friend of mine purchased an engine part on ebay but received a brick insted. Paypal then refused to give the money back because he had signed it out. In total I've lost 1000's of dollars due to Paypal just handing it back to the fraudster. It doesn't matter what you say or what evidence you got. Me personally have never won a paypal dispute as a mercher. My recommendation to other people, I know its a loss of customers but LibertyReserve, bitcoins or old fashion bankwire is as safe as it gets.
  • kamjam 14y ago
    Apparently all your friend had to do was raise a claim as "item not as described"... But yeah, I get your point and try to avoid eBay as much as possible, although sometimes, very rare now, I have no choice. It eats me up inside when I do though :-(
• lsllc 14y ago
  Since you shipped via USPS, the buyer has committed mail fraud. Call the US Postal Inspection Service, they are federal agents with no jurisdiction issues as the local police will have. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Inspection_Service http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Inspection... Edit: USPIS Wikipedia link
  • Vivtek 14y ago
    This is an excellent idea. The USPS really doesn't look kindly on mail fraud.
• ericdykstra 14y ago
  Unfortunately, buyer protection is just as bad! I recently bought an item on Ebay from an Ebay shop in China and paid extra for EMS shipping because I needed it fairly quickly (less than 2 weeks). The seller sent using a non-EMS method that barely got to my door in time, and it was the wrong item completely! When escalated to Ebay, they would only refund the item and original shipping fee and only if I sent back the item and paid for my own shipping to send it back. I later learned that the seller was out of stock for the item, and figure that they must have sent the wrong item purposefully (since you're not supposed to be selling something you don't actually have). But there's no way to actually contact Ebay support, so there was nothing I could do. Really going to avoid Ebay from now on because of that poor experience. No protection on any side.
  • Karunamon 14y ago
    This happened to me once as well - there's no eBay dispute resolution process for shipping scams. If you spring for an extra $20 shipping cost to get it express, there's nothing, absolutely nothing, stopping the seller from shipping it media mail and keeping the $19. EB/PP will tell you to get bent as long as you get the item. I had someone do this to me a while ago on a laptop. As usual, Paypal and eBay were utterly useless. I marked the guy all ones on his shipping ratings, but considering this was a high volume seller, the effect is probably nonexistent.
• DanBlake 14y ago
  The absolute, 100% way to solve this is to let sellers decide who can bid/buy on their items. If I can say "Only users who have been on ebay X months/years with Y feedback" that is such a major awesomeness. It also puts the control back in my hands. Maybe I dont get as much money when I sell a item, but I have way less risk of getting fucked. Also, it would not stop new ebayers from being able to buy things. eBay could 'eat the risk' or make them guarantee if a seller set up his auction that way.
  • kamjam 14y ago
    You can already do this on eBay, the sellers with Y feedback thing http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/sell/buyer-requirements.html http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/sell/buyer-requirements.html More specifically: http://imgur.com/xvAYd http://imgur.com/xvAYd But it still doesn't get round the way this specific scam works, see post from Spooky23 above for a great explanation.
    • DanBlake 14y ago
      Unfortunately that only lets you block people with bad feedback. You cant say "you cant buy unless you have 10+ feedback" Most scammers have no bad feedback, they are just new accounts with 5-10 positive feedback for bogus items.
      • kamjam 14y ago
        Yes you can, what do you think "Block users who have a feedback score equal to or lower than X" means? X can be set to 10 if you want. That imgurl I linked to was directly from my eBay account.
        • DanBlake 14y ago
          The only options on it are -1, -2 and -3
          • kamjam 14y ago
• ansible 14y ago
  I'd recommend contacting all the carriers that this phone is compatible with, and tell them that the phone has been stolen. Give them the IMEI number, serial number and whatever else. If you can get law enforcement interested in the case (highly unlikely, but who knows), they should be able to issue a search warrant, and get the location of the phone from the carrier. If they can track it down to a residential address, then they may be able to find the actual person. It would be helpful if the other sellers also had remotely trackable items. Regardless, you'll want to be coordinating with them on the item descriptions.
  • VMG 14y ago
    The fact that it wasn't actually stolen makes this seem a little risky.
    • Karunamon 14y ago
      It would be considered a form of shoplifting wouldn't it? (Honestly curious here)
      • ceol 14y ago
        I'm not a lawyer or a police officer, but doesn't this sound more like fraud?
        • Amadou 14y ago
          IANAL either. BUT, I know a guy who had his car stolen through fraud. The fraudster gave him a bogus cashiers check (and his bank took over a month after deposit to alert him that the check was bogus). His car insurance paid out on a theft claim. I'm sure there were more details to it, but I've never heard of "fraud insurance" as part of an auto insurance policy.
          • wjamesg 14y ago
            FYI (everyone): US Post Office offers a money order verification system to avoid bogus transactions like these. I've gone so far as to choose a meeting location around the corner from a post office location and insist on a money order from that location. https://www.usps.com/shop/accepting-money-orders.htm https://www.usps.com/shop/accepting-money-orders.htm
• TheCapn 14y ago
  I had an issue with Paypal (outside of eBay) a few years ago and since have given up on anyone I can't work with my credit card company directly against. I bought a few car parts from a shop who ended up shipping me only half my order. I contacted them, they re-sent me the same half a second time (so I had 2 of the same item, but no 2nd part). Contacted them again. Received the same item a third time and was fed up at this point. I had paid duties on each item to receive the package to only find I had more worthless parts and contacted PayPal for a dispute. Turns out the only proof the seller had to provide was proof that there was a package shipped. No proof of contents or receipt or anything. Learned a valuable lesson that day.
• gnosis 14y ago
  The OP says he "Only sells to people with significant positive feedback", "Only ships to CONFIRMED Paypal addresses", and "Requires Signature Confirmation for items over $250" Does ebay policy allow this? I thought the seller had to sell to the winning bidder, regardless of buyer's feedback, etc.
  • Karunamon 14y ago
    Those are flags you can set in your sale, regarding feedback at least. If someone has negative feedback, or lives outside of a list of countries, or has unpaid item strikes, the user won't even see your sale. Confirmed address is a paypal policy you can also turn on, which forces the seller to use their paypal confirmed address when checking out or none at all. If someone wins and they ask you to ship elsewhere, you say no. Which sucks because the buyer might ding your DSRs (detailed seller ratings), which determine your ebay privileges, search ranking position, fees... (Whoever decided that buyers should be exempt from negative feedback needs their fucking head examined) Signature confirmation is an option you set with your shipper.
    • DanBlake 14y ago
      You cant set a flag for having little or no feedback, only bad feedback. So if I am a brand new ebay account with zero feedback, I can still buy. Its annoying.
    • lmm 14y ago
      >(Whoever decided that buyers should be exempt from negative feedback needs their fucking head examined) It's the best decision ebay ever made. The seller is in a much better position to rip you off than the buyer is (as others pointed out, this scam is only possible for goods that you can convert back to cash). It used to be impossible to leave negative feedback for bad sellers, because the hit to your own reputation cost more than just eating the loss.
• jakejake 14y ago
  I actually wrote about this 6 years ago when eBay first started leaning their policy towards protecting buyers at the expense of the sellers. I went from selling things on eBay regularly to never using them for anything. Especially an iPhone or any new "hot" item you will be inundated with scam bids. And as an additional slap in the face you can't even give a buyer negative feedback anymore so what's even the point of feedback? It reminds me of when the post office, in response to long lines, resolved the problem by removing all clocks. I know this was in reaction to scammers placing fake auctions but eBay basically threw out the baby with the bathwater with their buyer protection policies. The scammers just moved to the buyer side where they enjoy lopsided protection. This is my post from 2006 - a variation of the scam, but the seller protection is equally non-existant: http://verysimple.com/2006/08/13/ebay-laptop-scammers-part-ii/ http://verysimple.com/2006/08/13/ebay-laptop-scammers-part-i...
• arbuge 14y ago
  As an ecommerce merchant, I've frankly come to view the whole chargeback thing as excessive and unfair buyer protection. The customer really is not always right - but the staff at merchant banks and PayPal seem to operate under the assumption that he/she is.
• jamesjguthrie 14y ago
  I have no faith in PayPal as a payment processor any more. There's these problems, problems with PayPal placing random account holds etc. They really don't want business from the little sellers any more.
• pbreit 14y ago
  I would have expected David Marcus (PayPal CEO) to chime in by now but apparently not. Counterparty risk is definitely a hard problem to solve but this situation seems easy to solve: if the buyer is complaining "not as described", there should need to be some sort of attempt to return the item (at seller's expense or split).
  • Metapony 14y ago
    It does seem pretty obvious, doesn't it? Item not as described? Prove it! But then all the buyer has to do is smash it themselves and send it back.
  • jellicle 14y ago
    It's not even that hard. If Paypal has someone who supposedly bought 4 iPhones in quick succession and all 4 were "not as described", either he's the single unluckiest person in the world (in which case Paypal should get rid of him, in case his bad luck is infectious), or he's a scammer, in which case Paypal should get rid of him.
  • pdonis 14y ago
    if the buyer is complaining "not as described", there should need to be some sort of attempt to return the item Exactly. I'm extremely confused as to why this does not appear to have been brought up by any of the parties in the OP's case.
    • finnw 14y ago
      What good would that do? The scammer would just "return" a broken phone, or a piece of roof tile, claim that was what they received, and the victim has now paid for shipping twice.
      • pbreit 14y ago
        It would help figure out how to resolve the situation at a modest cost (the cost being an important factor in reducing groundless claims).
  • 14y ago
• markokocic 14y ago
  Is this behaviour of PayPal possible only in USA, or it also applies to EU countries? Does EU regulations enforce some additional protection mechanisms for both sellers and buyers?
  • suhailpatel 14y ago
    I'm also wondering this. Most of the stories I hear are of issues in the USA/Canada rather than the EU. I bet we get our fair share of scams too but it'd be nice to know if there are any other protections (especially in the UK). Just my 2 cents, i've sold two smartphones on eBay and not had any issues. I once did have a scam buy-it-now where they'd asked to ship to a foreign country but was able to relist quickly and sell to a legitimate buyer.
• ROFISH 14y ago
  Sounds like a problem with the credit card system rather than Paypal, since it appears the customer used a credit card. If you sold iPhones via Stripe, you're still liable for the same chargebacks.
• benguild 14y ago
  This happens all of the time. Paypal is caught in the middle, and the credit card company almost always decides in favor of the buyer. It's because they're trying to provide the same service for both EFTs and credit cards, and those work very differently in the real world. Unfortunately, PayPal sticks the user with the cost in this case. It would be out of business I'd imagine if it ate the cost. Whenever someone pays for something with a credit card using PayPal, you automatically lose all of your protections if they dispute it through their cardholder. They just act as a passthrough.
• deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
• dgdfbvcxbgrd 14y ago
  I keep reading such stories every week on HN. This problem doesn't exists in Poland. There is no such thing as chargeback because banking system runs on top of free, irreversible wire transfer, not credit cards. The system is better because it's easier to trust established seller than to trust random buyer. Malicious sellers are very rare. Instead of chargebacks there are other protections: a) Even 10$ items are treated as criminal offense (fraud). b) Buyer can return anything in 10 days. c) Sellers and buyers are linked to national id card which is hard to cheat. Police has 95+% success rate finding fraudsters. d) Auction site has buyer protection, but it requires reporting on police.
• trustfundbaby 14y ago
  I'm surprised that people still use ebay, I gradually moved to Amazon marketplace/trade-ins 5-8 years ago and reading this, I'm glad I did.
• anigbrowl 14y ago
  I don't have much sympathy for this seller. - General Delivery is a big red flag, paypal confirmed or no. - You should check buyer feedback in advance, not afterwards. - don't leave feedback until you have the cash in your own bank account. - For expensive items, don't just get signature confirmation, pay the extra few $ for insurance. I insure anything over $50, for two reasons: you can claim against the insurance if the buyer alleges the goods are damaged/missing, and if the buyer is scamming then the insurance means they're trying to commit fraud against the carrier, who are more likely to prosecute it aggressively. This is also why I prefer to ship via the post office. Sorry, but if you shipped an $850 item without insuring the shipment, you're foolish.
  • WiseWeasel 14y ago
    The problem with accepting PayPal or CC payments is that you can withdraw the money from your PayPal account immediately, but they can still issue a charge-back up to 180 days later and your PayPal account will be deducted that amount. For remote transactions, money order by mail or Bitcoin are your only safe, non-reversible options as a seller.
    • anigbrowl 14y ago
      Hence the insurance.
      • mcherm 14y ago
        I fail to see how is the insurance would have helped in this case. No one disputes that the package was delivered successfully.
        • bloaf 14y ago
          Well if you put the right thing in the box, and the recipient says that he got the wrong thing, couldn't you therefore argue that the package was tampered with?
          • 14y ago
• ChuckMcM 14y ago
  Fascinating, back in the way back time when Ebay was first starting, the only way I would sell something was payment in advance, but check. Further the check needed to clear my bank before I would ship the merchandise. This was a pain but it was the only way to do business if you wanted to avoid fraud. Paypal made this so much easier, they would carry the risk if it was a 'certified' account. The whole "not as described" is an impossibly giant and stupid loophole. Back to asking for checks I guess.
  • chockablock 14y ago
    Funds from bad checks can be pulled from your account even after the check has 'cleared'. cf. 419 scams.
    • ChuckMcM 14y ago
      To be explicitly precise, Wells Fargo will not honor a 'stop payment' on a check which has settled. The settlement date is not the same as the 'hold' date, they may release funds prior to the settlement date if you are a good customer, with the understanding that if the check is subsequently refused by the originating bank, or is shown to be invalid, the deposit will be reversed. The most common scam that trips people up is the 'over amount' check where a "cashiers check" for more than the amount purchased is sent with the instructions to deposit the whole thing and just send back another check with the overage. When the check finally 'bounces' the check sent has already settled and you're out the amount of the overage (and possibly the item). In this way writing a check is exactly the same as handing the person cash, once both banks agree the funds from one is in the other and the accounts are all updated, assuming it wasn't in error, and the other party doesn't have special privileges (there is an exemption that governments can pull back funds) the only way to reverse that transaction is a lawsuit. Well at least according the commercial banker who handles my business account at Wells Fargo.
• TwoBit 14y ago
  Why on earth anybody would be dumb enough to sell an iPhone 5 on eBay is beyond me.
• qq66 14y ago
  Yep, this is why on the rare occasions that I sell anything on eBay I write in the item description, and enforce, a rule that only accounts over 3 years old with more than 100 feedback are welcome to bid. I'm sure that shrinks my market and depresses my price but better that than being scammed.
• arbuge 14y ago
  It's called "friendly fraud": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendly_fraud http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendly_fraud Cute name, serious problem.
• mrchess 14y ago
  The Paypal dispute system is a joke. I had a simliar experience with a $300 laptop. The condition it came in was NOT as described. I tried to get the seller to refund, but he just ignored my messages. Unable to contact the seller, I opened a dispute case and I took photos, documented the entire thing, and even did the dispute message system (and the seller didn't respond once to my complaints within the dispute system). After 3? weeks of no response, I clicked escalate button to firm up the dispute and push it to Paypal so they could decide. I thought I had a clear cut case -- photos, documentation, 21 days of seller not even trying to defend himself. Seller, upon getting the final warning, finally replied with a message along the lines of "I offered a refund but buyer never contacted me" with no proof... and Paypal voted in his favor. Fuck Paypal.
  • danielweber 14y ago
    Does Paypal have a messaging system like eBay? Whenever I've had an eBay dispute (rare), I always communicate using their messaging system so they can see exactly what we are saying to each other.
    • mrchess 14y ago
      Yeah. When I referred "Dispute Center" above, all the messages took place inside Paypal's internal dipsute center messaging system.
• e40 14y ago
  I tried to sell an expensive camera through eBay and after a month I gave up. Twice the auction completed and the person that won tried to scam me. I decided to go the Craigslist route and sold it in a few days to someone that I met at a local bank and we were both happy. eBay were not very good, in my case, either. I spent hours on the phone. It was clear that the person that won the auction bid up to insure they won it. I'm pretty certain I had legit buyers at lower bids, and I would have been happy to sell at those bids. The reason I even tried a second time was that I didn't know about the ability to exclude certain buyers. For the second auction I tweaked all the knobs that massively restricted the auction to only the safest buyers. I don't know what happened, but someone with an account that was a few hours old won the auction. I think it was the same person that won it the first time. I called eBay again and they voided the auction after a few days. It was a really horrible experience and I'll never use eBay to sell anything ever again.
• SoftwareMaven 14y ago
  This sounds like time for a small-claims court case. Take Paypal to court. Given the evidence of fraudulent transactions, I would say there is a chance they could lose. And, if nothing else, it will cost them at least the $600 to pay for it.
• tlb 14y ago
  It sucks to be among the most gullible 1% of buyers or sellers in a marketplace, weighted by sales volume. In first-world markets, overall fraud is around 1%. But since experienced buyers and sellers learn to avoid it, the least experienced ones absorb most of the losses. Whether you're in the most gullible 1% depends on who else you're competing with. For example, if you're selling a used car, you have to be fairly dumb to be in the most gullible 1% since lots of regular people do the same. But the vast majority of iPhones on eBay are sold by sophisticated, professional, full-time merchants. So unless you have inside knowledge, you probably are in the most gullible 1% of iPhone sellers on eBay.
• edj 14y ago
  I've been scammed selling on eBay and will probably never sell there again, but if I did I'd want a cheat sheet of scam countermeasures. Here's a start based on the OP's safety checklist (points 3 through 5), comments in this thread, and my own experience. 1) Try not to sell on eBay. Perhaps Craigslist or another marketplace will work instead. Unfortunately, people in low population density areas are kind of screwed without an online marketplace. 2) Block all buyers from countries other than your own. In massive markets like the US, gaining a few more potential buyers is not worth the increased risk of fraud or loss during shipment. Perhaps in smaller countries this rule won't work as well. 3) Only sell to people with significant positive feedback. 4) Only ship to CONFIRMED Paypal addresses. 5) Require Signature Confirmation for items over $250. 6) Don't accept PayPal; require money orders for payment. This might scare off potential buyers. However, it has the benefit of taking PayPal and credit card chargeback schemes completely off the table. 7) Don't ship General Delivery.
  • ars 14y ago
    If you do 6 you'll sell exactly 0 items. Rule number 1 for buyers: Don't pay with a money order, always use a credit card. You're only thinking about protecting yourself - but you also have to actually attract buyers.
    • edj 14y ago
      I agree. A few other commenters suggested this on this thread, but personally I can't imagine buying anything requiring me to send a money order.
• bunturedempter 14y ago
  The something happened to me like two years ago.
• paulhauggis 14y ago
  Add Amazon to your list. It's much worse. -You can't block scammers -Buyers can return an item for any reason (even a year after they purchased it from you). 99% of the time, Amazon will let them keep the item and refund them. This happened to me many times. -If you get banned, they will keep your money for 90 days. Banning is based on automated robots that look for patterns. You have no recourse. All Amazon associates will tell you to use their email support system. The email support system is manned by either scripts or reps that will only respond with canned answers. Ebay isn't nearly as bad. I've had claims filed against me a few times by various people and as long as I had the tracking number, I won the claim. As someone who made amazon thousands of dollars, I got tried of being treated this way. The only reason they can still continue this behavior is because they are the biggest marketplace. It's hard for competitors because you need the traffic.
• Tomdarkness 14y ago
  Can someone explain to me how you can have a general delivery as a confirmed PayPal address? Seems a bit silly that PayPal would allow this.
• Jugmendra 14y ago
  Efforts and time required
• johnnymonster 14y ago
  These kind of stories is EXACTLY why I will never sell anything on eBay...
• saurabhnanda 14y ago
  Fundamentally, is this a problem with eBay/PayPal or how credit card companies deal with chargebacks (and eBay/PayPal simply having to parrot the same model)? As part of a large OTA, I've dealt with credit card chargebacks in the travel industry and it's really not pretty. As soon as a chargeback is received by the bank, you, the merchant, are presumed guilty. It's up to you to prove your "innocence". The buyer can simply claim one of the many frivolous reasons without providing an iota of proof and you'll be stuck with providing reams of paperwork - chargeslip, e-ticket, boarding pass, verification from airline that the passenger boarded the plane, etc. etc.
• shakeel_mohamed 14y ago
  The same thing happened to me with a BlackBerry a few years back. Somehow my Paypal account was limited immediately afterwards, and thus my eBay account was limited by virtue of connection. I have no respect for either of these companies.
• freedom21 14y ago
  Did Paypal steel your money? If you are a California resident you can file a complaint right now and get a response within 5 days from the Department of Financial Institutions. In California, Paypal may only hold your funds for up to 10 days only. Paypal has rules which they must comply with as a licensed money transmitter and this department enforces those rules. Fill out the online form today. You could have your money released within days! I did it and it works. https://dfi.secureprtportal.com/dficase/programs/eComplaint/dfi_ecomplaint.aspx https://dfi.secureprtportal.com/dficase/programs/eComplaint/...
• surferbayarea 14y ago
  ebay will go into oblivion in a few years. The current generation barely uses them. As the last generation users slowly fade away, they will see the business dwindling. Add to it incompetent management who stifle innovation.
• eloisant 14y ago
  In US you don't have the "pay at delivery" system? E.g. the postman gives the item to the buyer in exchange of the payment, then the post office pays you.
• jeffyee 14y ago
  I've read all of the comments and believe the consensus is basically: - It's a lot cheaper for ebay/paypal to let the scammers rip off people than it is to go after them, even when the facts clearly identify the scammer - Casual sellers are both less able to detect fraud and are more greatly impacted by it - The feedback mechanism is insufficient "insurance" against fraud - "Seller protection" and "Buyer protection" are not suitable insurances against the kind of fraud that actually occurs - The vast majority of transactions are legitimate - The selling prices on ebay can be substantially higher than Gazelle/Amazon, or other reputable channel - Fraud will undoubtedly occur in some cases How about if a 3rd party sold real buyer or seller insurance? They would be in the business of identifying scam-like behaviour from buyers/sellers, help you to avoid fraud it can detect, and ultimately insure you from loss. Not sure how much the premium would need to be in order to make this work, but seems like an interesting idea.
• dendory 14y ago
  People abusing Buyer Protection on eBay is nothing new, and has been getting out of control. But saying you should sell on eBay using something other than PayPal is just not realistic. People expect to pay with PayPal.
• sdfjkl 14y ago
  So what's a good alternative to the evil empire of eBay/PayPal? In the UK (where PayPal is the only valid way to pay for anything on eBay) there is just Gumtree, which is not an auction site and many categories get barely looked at (and those that do are swarming with scammers too), plus a few small auction sites that have so few users it's not worth bothering.
  • Nursie 14y ago
    I used gumtree in Australia to great effect a little while ago. You may not get quite the same price you could through ebay, but you don't have any fees so I'm pretty sure I cam out ahead. That and transactions were completed in person for cash. When one of my items (WiMAX router) didn't work correctly for the new buyer I offered to go round and help and give a full refund if I couldn't get it working (it started working thankfully). The weird thing about gumtree was the rapidity of response - I put a microwave oven on there a midnight on a Saturday night, and got three email responses within 15 minutes. They didn't follow up the next day, leading me to think perhaps they were drunk or stoned prospective microwave owners, but it still sold within 12 hours. Perhaps I was too cheap, but it was an 'everything-must-go' emigration situation.
    • alextingle 14y ago
      Read the comment text. Checked the userid. Was not disappointed.
      • Nursie 14y ago
        All is discovered! Flee at once!
• lucian1900 14y ago
  And it's not only seller protection that is lacking. Twice I've bought broken items that eBay & PayPal refused to let me return (one was a smartphone with broken touch, the other a kindle reported as lost/stolen). They really, really suck. Sadly, there is little alternative to eBay.
• kahawe 14y ago
  I think this problem goes a bit deeper and it is something I have been wondering about. When I send a letter or a package and want to be sure it was received, I can rely on tracking or I can go the extra mile and request a signed return-receipt. Now all I have is confirmation the letter or package was handed over and someone confirmed they got it. They can still claim when they opened it, it was nothing but empty pages or a couple of stones - and there is no proof I actually put an iphone or important documents in there. There is nothing that guarantees both the seller AND the buyer that the actual item was very well in there and it was just as advertised in the auction and there is no easy way to prove it either. From a legal point of view, how could you solve this? Let a third, independent and reliable party handle the transaction for you? Or do you pay a notary to certify that you actually packaged the iphone and that it's condition is as advertised?
  • dexen 14y ago
    Polish Post Office provides a service solving this very problem: the sender can marked the parcel with ``recipient opens the parcel in presence of mailman before payment and can return it right away without payment if she so wishes'' option. This optional service is quite cheap, at about 10% of general shipment fee methinks. The other downside is that recipient have to pick the parcel, either at doorstep or at the post office; it cannot be left in the mailbox. On polish market, `allegro.pl' -- rather than eBay -- is the dominant auction/garage sale platform, and it is somewhat common to request such option when ordering from sellers without reputation. There is some abuse of this system, but it seems low enough.
    • kahawe 14y ago
      This sounds fantastic, both the option and allegro. I had a good experience selling someone a quite pricey item with cash-on-delivery and I don't think the buyer would have had much chance to rip me off there; of course as a fraudulent seller you could just send them the above mentioned stones or a cardboard box labeled "macbook pro" (which was prominently done to get back at a scammer).
    • shimon_e 14y ago
      It's like this in China also plus alipay holds the money in escrow.
• chib 14y ago
  I remember when eBay changed their policy so that sellers could no longer leave feedback, absolutely ridiculous. And I wouldn't trust PayPal as far as I could throw them.
• mvc 14y ago
  > the buyer’s credit card company decided in favor of the buyer. How is this PayPal's and not the credit card company's fault? Couldn't the same thing happen to anyone accepting credit card payments?
• cupcake-unicorn 14y ago
  I sell things very rarely on eBay - recently I got an old Laptop at a garage sale that I realized I had no use for and went ahead and sold it. Thankfully everything went well (I think the period for chargebacks has expired), but I had this awful feeling for a long time after the auction that something dodgy would happen. Every time I sell, I feel like I'm playing Russian Roulette. Like a lot of the other commenters, I'm not sure why more hasn't been done to help the sellers out. Shouldn't it be clear that it's a scam if a buyer does a CC chargeback, given that it's easy enough to file with Paypal? Also, wouldn't giving sellers the option to only accept payment via a bank account help?
• codenerdz 14y ago
  just an FYI, guys. Due to virality of this post and the waves of support on twitter, I got phone calls from both paypal executive offices and ebay's fraud teams that not only did resolve my issues, but also hinted at a serious effort at apprehending this fraudulent individual. Its very unfortunate that it took this community outcry to get this far. Im currently working on a "post-mortem" overview of my what happened in the past few days resolution-wise and ill post it on my blog. Tech-wise, its pretty amazing how much load a static octopress-based blog hosted for free on github pages would handle. Also im pretty glad I chose to host the pictures on picasaweb. Hosting them on S3 would turn out pretty pricey :)
  • djt 14y ago
    care to share with you what the stats are on your hosting arrangement? Im sure we could get a lot out of a debrief.
    • codenerdz 14y ago
      I wrote up a post-mortem here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4883468 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4883468
• sk24iam 14y ago
  We are actually developing a marketplace to help with cell phone fraud. We currently allow users to accept payments via paypal, google checkout, or amazon payments and expect to introduce Stripe Connect payments in 2013. This is only a start to preventing fraud but we have more features still being tested including a feedback system that we hope will work better than eBay's does. This thread is very helpful in determining what people want in a peer to peer marketplace. Our site is still very new but we are open to criticism. cellsolo dot com
• davidf18 14y ago
  The problem with Paypal/Ebay should be referred to your State Attorney General. If enough people complain your state Attorney General could file a lawsuit against Paypal/Ebay. The way I read this is that Paypal/Ebay does not have the appropriate mechanisms in place to protect sellers from fraudulent chargebacks and the seller loses out even when the case is clear that the chargeback is fraudulent. The message appears to be that, "sorry, we agree with you the seller but since the buyers bank agreed to the chargeback you are out of luck." In my view the State AGs should force Paypal/Ebay to take the loss in the case of fraudulent chargeback thus providing an incentive for Paypay/Ebay to fix the system. The seller protection policy should be that as long as the buyer received the proper product, you should get paid for it regardless of fraudulent chargebacks honored by the buyers bank.
• PagingCraig 14y ago
  I learned a long time ago never to sell expensive goods through Ebay. It's a bad time waiting to happen.
• codenerdz 14y ago
  Thanks for all the support guys! I wrote up a post-mortem here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4883468 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4883468 it includes some fun site stats