3 ms·
looks like it's just qwen 3.6 coder.
by cyanydeez 5mo ago
looks like it's just qwen 3.6 coder.
- lumost 5mo agoits worse at code compared to qwen 3.6 coder.
- stymaar 5mo agoHow can it be worse than something that doesn't exist?
- amunozo 5mo agoSometimes non-existing is better than existing for unnecessary or harmful things. I know that is not what you mean but I just found it relevant in the age in which making new stuff is so fast and easy due to LLMs. Main enshitification would come, imo, not from bad things but for unnecessary things that nobody asked for.
- SubiculumCode 5mo agoDo you mean it's based on qwen 3.6 coder?
- daemonologist 5mo agoThere is no "coder" version of Qwen 3.6; I think they just mean it's a coding-focused model of similar size and performance (to Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B). Regular Qwen 3.6 benchmarks slightly better and has much wider software support though, so this is probably of interest only to organizations which disallow models trained in China.
- kadoban 5mo agoI mean, Qwen 3.6 kicks ass. I don't know who these people are, but if their first outing is "not quite as good as Qwen 3.6", that's not a bad start by any means. 30B vs 35B isn't nothing either. If it ends up just being some tweaks to someone else's weights, then meh.
- mtone 5mo agoIt was trained from scratch by Cohere. They're the only Canadian AI lab - I'm glad they're releasing open weights and I wish them luck catching up!