3 ms·
What if the best "person" to operate an LLM is an LLM itself, or more precisely an agentic loop driven by an LLM? DO you believe this won't be the case?
by atleastoptimal 4mo ago
What if the best "person" to operate an LLM is an LLM itself, or more precisely an agentic loop driven by an LLM? DO you believe this won't be the case?
- ex-aws-dude 4mo agoThe CEO of the company is not going to be directing the LLM At minimum you at least need CEO -> product person -> LLM There can any number of agents/loops after that but someone has to translate the requirements to the LLM and monitor/verify the results. What I'm saying is in the extreme case the SE evolves to become the product person. If you want to argue for fully autonomous companies then thats drifting into sci-fi
- atleastoptimal 4mo ago> The CEO of the company is not going to be directing the LLM Why not? Many CEOs are prompting LLMs and coding agents directly. What happens when the CEO -> LLM interaction is more efficient than CEO -> product person -> LLM? > If you want to argue for fully autonomous companies then thats drifting into sci-fi Why couldn't a software company be completely automated with sufficiently powerful LLM-run agents? What fundamentally is the barrier, if the models are intelligent enough?
- ex-aws-dude 4mo agoBecause then you're just describing AGI not LLMs, which in the short term is obviously not happening Long term maybe but its not a very interesting conversation to talk about things that far out.
- atleastoptimal 4mo agowhat are your definitions of “long term” and “short term” with respect to number of years
- mejutoco 4mo agoThe barrier is who gets legally liable if things go wrong. An llm cannot go to prison.
- bdangubic 4mo agohttps://noqta.tn/en/news/polsia-ai-autonomous-company-30m-funding-2026 https://noqta.tn/en/news/polsia-ai-autonomous-company-30m-fu... :-)