4 ms·
> Because we don't have a right to a continuing service that requires their labor unless they agreed to it There are carve-outs in the legislation for this. It
by jasonlotito 5mo ago
> Because we don't have a right to a continuing service that requires their labor unless they agreed to it
There are carve-outs in the legislation for this. It's a moot point.
- knollimar 5mo agoLike what? I read it and don't see workabke carveouts.
- marcosdumay 5mo agoSo it's ok for companies to misrepresent their subscription services as a "single-payment" acquisition and pull the brought product away form their customers when they want?
- delichon 5mo agoNo, if they materially misrepresent their product like this it is fraud and a crime. A new law isn't needed if a prosecutor or plaintiff can show the misrepresentation.