4 ms·
More like repeating their firmly entrenched preconceptions. Their claims may (or may not) be right, but there's very little if any new evidence being provided
by cwillu 5mo ago
More like repeating their firmly entrenched preconceptions. Their claims may (or may not) be right, but there's very little if any new evidence being provided by either camp.
- throw310822 5mo agoThey are confidently hallucinating a factual statement. Which is funny when claiming that confident hallucinations are the proof of LLMs' lack of intelligence.
- WarmWash 5mo agoThe real uncomfortable thing is that because we cannot confidently know, the moral defacto position is to treat them like they are.
- themafia 5mo agoI know you "feel" pain because I can poke you and observe the result. If I do it enough there is permanent damage. Show this same phenomenon exists in LLMs.
- WarmWash 5mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie
- jasondclinton 5mo agoWe did exactly that and published it last month right here: https://www.anthropic.com/research/emotion-concepts-function https://www.anthropic.com/research/emotion-concepts-function
- themafia 5mo agoOne side is making a positive assertion. The other is making a negative assertion. One side can prove it's right. The other, logically, cannot. One camp has to offer it's proof. If it has none then that _in and of itself_ is highly suggestive. People have fully turned their minds off on this subject. It's disgusting.