My initial reaction was that this is pure insanity but in fairness this is a fairly 1:1 port of existing code, so the developer's mental model of it should stil

My initial reaction was that this is pure insanity but in fairness this is a fairly 1:1 port of existing code, so the developer's mental model of it should still match fairly well. For instance look at this Zig function: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/ed1a70f81708d7d137de8de057d11668c5f4e220/src/ast/scope.zig#L90-L174 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/ed1a70f81708d7d137de8de0... Versus this Rust version: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/ed1a70f81708d7d137de8de057d11668c5f4e220/src/ast/scope.rs#L154-L240 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/ed1a70f81708d7d137de8de0... I did pick that at random but it does look like the best case. I skimmed through a lot of the Rust code and there's a surprisingly small amount of `unsafe`. Still pretty insane to merge this in such a short time with so little testing, but I can easily think of bigger software engineering mistakes. Hell it's not like Bun even needs to be commercially successful any more.