jwpapi

5 ms·

1.
by jwpapi 5d ago
How about runpod
2.
by jwpapi 6d ago
and economically viable
3.
by jwpapi 6d ago
I think it can make a lot of sense to make a set with jev and then train laya on that set and do the rest with laya for saving $
4.
by jwpapi 6d ago
Okay I understand.. he’s up for the internet fame.
5.
by jwpapi 7d ago
With everybody bashing OP here, how is he supposed to even make money ? It’s n open-source model you self-host right? So he doesnt seem to be just greedy? He might genuinely feel like stolen. I hope he doesnt take the comments personally an
6.
by jwpapi 7d ago
I’ve tried it versus Jev and I got significantly worse decisions. I hosted it on runpod nvidia t4. I wanted to classify business b2b vs b2c and business model. Am I holding it wrong?
7.
by jwpapi 7d ago
Jev says you should restate state in the question and I tried it: { "decision": { "type": "noul", "instructions": "Is the rolled number in state odd?" }, "question":
8.
by jwpapi 7d ago
Where can I subscribe to a hosted version of this? I don’t want to host my own GPU.
9.
by jwpapi 9d ago
I’m missing an actual explanation of how that works. I feel like we all had the idea, but how is all possible move sequences proven ? What if the possible scenarios are too big to proof or test. Like on a 2 dimensional game it’s easy, but y
10.
by jwpapi 9d ago
It’s classifying faster and cheaper. A lot of immediate ideas are better solved by pre-classifying + embedding, but their doom example or the wikipedia runs are one where you can’t preclassify.
11.
by jwpapi 10d ago
In Jetbrains I do secondary shortcuts and I name them as what they are in my hand: Alt M + V = Move Alt E + C = Extract Component Alt S + E = Search Everywhere _ many more. Or just vim combos.. with ideavim
12.
by jwpapi 10d ago
You just have to do it so often that you’re annoyed by it and then you learn the shortcut and then you force yourself to always do the shortcut.
13.
by jwpapi 10d ago
May I ask why you ended up there instead of just using the heavy subsidized subscription. I’m actually curious.
14.
by jwpapi 10d ago
I think first of all it’s not an obvious idea, also the marketing surplus for other providers is not as big for openai/anthropic as for xiaomi and last but not least I’m pretty sure you can withdraw methodology from here. I’m saying wh
15.
by jwpapi 10d ago
I’ve played with it already. I don’t think this is the use case. I think Jev’s use case is fast, cheap and somewhat easy classification. It’s not trainable in the way you would want here. Even though it’s fast it wont be faster than pgs que
16.
by jwpapi 14d ago
I don’t know that’s why I’m happy to discuss. When I have a clean codebase it’s super powerful and faster than I am. Then I start to use it more, more sessions and longer tasks less checking in between. It kind of works but later I’m in a d
17.
by jwpapi 14d ago
I thought that the new models were super smart. Fable and Astra. They definitely outperformed their previous generations, but after a couple of weeks of heavy usage my codebase again is a stupid mess and there is no way out except me fixing
18.
by jwpapi 25d ago
Yeah that was what I was most worried about when I read the top comment here. I found the use of language a feature not a bug. I don’t care how good it reads. If I can communicate with it concicely it’s enough to get my work done. I don’t h
19.
by jwpapi 26d ago
Venting reduces the likelihood of acting in aggressive feelings
20.
by jwpapi 1mo ago
But a lot of the research is not about 'loneliness' in particular, but rather how friends or social circles make you happier
21.
by jwpapi 1mo ago
I know the difference, but the studies I’ve heard of seemed to rather focus on the benefits of social circles, not analyzing 'loneliness' in itself. However I haven’t fully digged into all the evidence, but I hope you guy’s are ri
22.
by jwpapi 1mo ago
All these studies suggest loneliness makes you unhappy, however I feel happiest most when lonely and doing my thing and not with people. With people I just feel frustrated or weird, because I think so different than the others.
23.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
First of all that could be a causality ≠ correlation, but more importantly. Even if it might be the biggest predictor, it might not be the biggest lever. Still interesting train of thought that I might need, but the article is exaggerating
24.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
Fair point. I still think you could build single person cars that are more secure than traditional cars and use less space and energy
25.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
I’m thinking that since 2015. Like BMW C1 just with doors on the side and a bit more security. This would approx allow 3-4x as many travellers on a given route compared to traditional cars.
26.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
Terminology is a crazy lever with AI
27.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
I think for small projects you need to scale the coders mental model, which afaik works in the fastest time, when you let ai do the exploration and planning, but coder needs to write the code itself and then ai verifies. That generates the
28.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
I don’t want to be a hater, but somehow i still keep throwing vacuum roboters away and prefer the manual machine. It somehow always ends up worrying me more than helping. Crashing, charging putting away, putting things away for it to work (
29.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
I think the author means ecomonically valuable not valuable to you.
30.
by jwpapi 2mo ago
I’m seeing a lot of people that having that train of thought. I think that is a fallacy. I can understand that some LLM execution can be faster, but definitely not all. Agents need to explore, grep and get back up to speed to get context, i

More ›