5 ms·
If containment was to fail, it the total energy released would have been approximately 2.766 * 10 ^ -8 J, so it wasn't particularly dangerous
by voidUpdate 6mo ago
If containment was to fail, it the total energy released would have been approximately 2.766 * 10 ^ -8 J, so it wasn't particularly dangerous
- comrade1234 6mo agoWhat is that in firecrackers? Gemini says a firecracker releases 150 J, so yeah not a lot.
- voidUpdate 6mo agoWolfram Alpha says its approximately the kinetic energy of a mosquito in flight
- schindlabua 6mo agoWhich seems suprisingly high given that it's 92 protons worth of antimatter!
- dandellion 6mo agoDefinitely, I've had a mosquito hit me while flying and you can actually feel it hit your skin.
- adonovan 6mo agoThe subject of this story is a single proton that you would definitely feel if it hit you: https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/OhMyGodParticle/ https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/OhMyGodParticle/
- jona-f 6mo agoI don't think that is the case. The kinetic energy of these super-energetic particles is often compared to a tennis ball. But that energy isn't released at once, so even if it would interact with yourself, that interaction creates a particle shower that takes most of the energy with it. I don't think we can feel one of our atoms getting violently ripped apart.
- cobbzilla 6mo agoThere’s Anatoli Bugorski [1] who accidentally put his head into the path of a high energy proton beam. The injury resembled nothing like being hit by tennis balls. > He reportedly saw a flash "brighter than a thousand suns" but did not feel any pain. He’s still alive today, age 83. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Bugorski https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Bugorski
- mastermage 6mo agoOh my god i never read this thats so cool
- dostick 6mo agoWhich kind of mosquito? European or Asian?
- api 6mo agoE=mc^2 and c^2 is a big number.
- nextaccountic 6mo agoindeed, but note that c^2 is just a factor to convert between units here and is completely arbitrary (or rather, c is so high because our units are human scale) indeed, in the most natural systems of units in this area, we set c = 1 as to simplify the equations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system
- mememememememo 6mo ago8 minutes to do a mere 1AU. Pretty slow. (not /s for clarification)
- extraduder_ire 6mo ago499.004783836 seconds. So, more like 8.32. I initially looked it up because I misremembered AU being a diameter rather than a radius.
- gopalv 6mo ago> c^2 is a big number. Famous tweet about conversations with God. [1] - https://x.com/WraithLaFrentz/status/1981404849305686219 https://x.com/WraithLaFrentz/status/1981404849305686219
- xeonmc 6mo agoExcept the fine structure constant
- nikhilisvalid 6mo agoWolfram Alpha says it's approximately _one-sixth_ the kinetic energy of a mosquito in flight
- tczMUFlmoNk 6mo agoWhen we're talking scales like 10^-23, "one" and "one sixth" are comparable enough to warrant an "approximately".
- idiotsecant 6mo agoI'm not sure! One is just barely within human scale and one isn't. I think I could feel the impact of a mosquito on a sufficiently sensitive patch of skin. I'm not sure I could do the same with one sixth of a mosquito. Its like the difference between something I can lift (100 lb) and something I definitely cannot lift (600lb)
- Zancarius 6mo agoIt's also the difference between 1lb and 6lbs also, so the analogy isn't perfect. The problem is that once you approach the limits of the average human ability, multipliers can transform something possible into something impossible. I'm pretty sure I could feel one sixth of a mosquito hit me, because I've been pelted by much smaller gnats before! (It does depend on where, of course.)
- fc417fc802 6mo agoEven though you can't lift the 600 lb object it's still in the correct ballpark for illustrative purposes when dealing with orders of magnitude. In a similar vein a 20 gallon fishtank and a small bathtub are approximately the same despite that I can't actually fit in the 20 gallon fishtank myself.
- voidUpdate 6mo agoSorry, you're right, I misread the results (wow that makes me sound like an LLM, I'm not, I promise)
- Anonbrit 6mo agoIt's a fraction of the energy released when an unlit fire cracker is dropped an inch. Basically unmeasurable
- vivid242 6mo agoIt was on the radio here (I live on its route)- the ‚receiving’ physicist said it would be way less than what we catch anyway from daily cosmic radiation.
- dylan604 6mo agoBaby steps on our way to a Dan Brown scene lighting up the night sky
- mrexroad 6mo agoOr a warp core!
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- AnimalMuppet 6mo agoFor 92 protons? So 3*10^-10 J per proton? For a tiny number, that is still insanely high...
- fc417fc802 6mo agoChicxulub impact estimated 300 ZJ, zetta being 10^21 giving us 10^23 and 10^-10. Avogadro's constant is 6×10^23. So that's 10^33 protons or 5/3×10^9 moles. It's difficult to get a sense of what that actually means because protons aren't a typical substance. I guess the closest human relatable approximation might be liquid hydrogen. That's about 2 g/mol and ~0.71 g/ml so 2.82 ml/mol but that's H2 (ie 2 protons) so our equivalent would be 1.41 ml/mol yielding 2.35 million liters. I tried to compare to oil tankers but glancing at Wikipedia it seems the smallest crude tankers are at least 25× that size. The largest oil tankers in the world (of which there are 4) carry ~450 million liters which works out to ~191 chicxulub equivalents (assuming I did all the math correctly). According to Wikipedia Castle Bravo was ~500 L of lithium deuteride and yielded ~63 PJ making it ~5 million of those to 1 chicxulub equivalent; the supertanker would equate to about 1 billion. In other words ~1000× more energy density than lithium deuteride powered fusion which is itself already so absurd that it's difficult to comprehend. That was a lot more involved than I expected. I really hope I didn't misplace an order of magnitude or three anywhere.
- voidUpdate 6mo ago*184, a particle annihilates with its antiparticle and both of them are converted into energy, so 92 antiprotons will also destroy 92 standard protons. but yes, C^2 is a very big number
- steve_adams_86 6mo agoIt would be trivial to reroute power from the secondary systems to the forward shields anyway
- techsystems 6mo agoBut we have to reroute power from life support because auxiliary systems are down!
- steve_adams_86 6mo agoOnly on the unoccupied decks!
- vee-kay 6mo ago[dead]
- mrexroad 6mo agoTry reversing the polarity
- malfist 6mo agoIf it's built to federation specs, we even have redundancies for the redundancies.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- 6mo ago
- SilentM68 6mo agoTraveling the cosmos by folding space is recommended to avoid these types of issues, because "The Spice Must Flow!"
- snthpy 6mo agoFirst thing that I did was also to do that calc and I was surprised by how little energy it was.