tty456

4 ms·

1.
by tty456 2mo ago
Basic take
2.
by tty456 2mo ago
Hilarious. Do they preface the conversation with "Well, Claude said..."?
3.
by tty456 2mo ago
The No Kings rallies are pretty massive
4.
by tty456 2mo ago
Exact words were said numerous times in Apple's lineup over the years. I don't think this is like Vision Pro however
5.
by tty456 2mo ago
Do they also not trust their code review processes?
6.
by tty456 3mo ago
Brilliant. I also like "health-related bankruptcy protection"
7.
by tty456 3mo ago
They're deliberately weakening the U.S. Treason.
8.
by tty456 3mo ago
Had to look this up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmKoC57UWUI
9.
by tty456 3mo ago
Where specifically do you think they lack, and what do you suggest they focus on?
10.
by tty456 3mo ago
is this an app? web tool?
11.
by tty456 3mo ago
Why?
12.
by tty456 3mo ago
Those are some very Senior lowers
13.
by tty456 3mo ago
Thought there would be something interesting here about building for key gaps in a specific market vs innovating and finding long term product market fit. But all I see are simple made up stats and high school guidance counselor level advic
14.
by tty456 3mo ago
Most corrupt administration. Hope all these guys do hard time.
15.
by tty456 4mo ago
Call the recruiters out by name.
16.
by tty456 4mo ago
But someone who is not well versed in coding can evaluate the output simply by running the built app and testing it, which is an oversimplification and omits the tech debt and eventual issues that an experienced developer would catch or res
17.
by tty456 4mo ago
Sounds like another prompt is in order to re-write the code
18.
by tty456 4mo ago
Has he really evangelized the evil practices that you are so concerned about? Or would you lump in anyone working at Google to not live up to your expectations?
19.
by tty456 4mo ago
If don't bolt them down, sure
20.
by tty456 5mo ago
"take home, closed book" This is a trap. I understand they've done this in the past, but profs are paranoid now. I don't believe he's 100% correct on each incident of fraud and he's going to ruin students [acad
21.
by tty456 5mo ago
Love the concept! Although found it a bit leading of easy answers once I landed on a word where changing the first letter yielded many new words (i.e. word like 'time' yielded many new *ime words, or plural words if ending in an s
22.
by tty456 5mo ago
A lot of it is straight up sponsored by card makers too
23.
by tty456 5mo ago
Also, kids get scammed daily on YouTube on Pokemon card pulls with "loaded" packs and otherwise fake pulls for views.
24.
by tty456 5mo ago
> registrants returned again and again to the same theme: that AI will reorder work, war, education, and belief within a few years. These things are already happening, whether we want them to or not. Elites will no doubt benefit from the
25.
by tty456 5mo ago
Elon must be licking his chops right now, hoping that the "OpenAI problem" will just solve itself which bumps up X.ai as a competitor to Anthropic but under the guise and financial manipulation of all of SpaceX and it's subsi
26.
by tty456 5mo ago
Do the customers know they're interacting with AI? If so, is that the intention?
27.
by tty456 5mo ago
Orly? What is?
28.
by tty456 5mo ago
I assume for a lot of people, an llm is going to produce higher quality results for most knowledge tasks than they could do on their own. I think that's okay
29.
by tty456 5mo ago
You're confusing the beurocratic FDA stamp of approval with safety and effectiveness. Those are not the same thing.
30.
by tty456 5mo ago
How long did AMZN do it for?

More ›