4 ms·
BC didn't get rid of it. Now it's permanent.
by tobadzistsini 7mo ago
BC didn't get rid of it. Now it's permanent.
- cwillu 7mo agoThey got rid of the biannual clock change, which is obviously what they're talking about.
- kixiQu 7mo ago"Daylight Saving Time" refers to adjusting the time in a way that noon does not try to track solar noon for a timezone in order to shift daylight later in the clock-day.
- gonzalohm 7mo agoIf we were trying to adjust the time to track the solar time, wouldn't we need to adjust the clocks every day as days get shorter/longer? I keep seeing this in every post discussing Daylight Savings. What's the obsession with tracking solar noon?
- hn_throwaway_99 7mo ago> If we were trying to adjust the time to track the solar time, wouldn't we need to adjust the clocks every day as days get shorter/longer? No (not within a min or two). When days get shorter, it's not like they just lose daylight in the evening.
- 1718627440 7mo ago> If we were trying to adjust the time to track the solar time, No, but > wouldn't we need to adjust the clocks every day as days get shorter/longer This is how hours used to work at least in Roman times, but I think also into the Medieval Ages.
- verall 7mo agoTracking solar time would mean it's equivalently light out at 5AM and at 7PM. Nearly noone is awake at 5AM. Nearly everyone is awake at 7PM. You can wave your arms around and say "well then why don't people wake up earlier", but they have jobs and stuff. The "scientific evidence" for standard time is flimsy.
- 1718627440 7mo agoPeople did wake up at way earlier. Working hours have shifted past by a few hours during the last century, so it seems like people actually prefer that.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- dghlsakjg 7mo agoThat’s what the actual news release and title say if you read the article you are commenting on. Not sure why the title got changed for this post.