4 ms·
As an observation, global warming has completely disappeared as social concern in the last few years. Great that someone is still publishing research, but it se
by xyzelement 8mo ago
As an observation, global warming has completely disappeared as social concern in the last few years. Great that someone is still publishing research, but it seems like being a climate scientist has gone from hottest field to nobody cares.
- hackyhacky 8mo agoNothing like fascism and war to take your mind off the environment.
- Octoth0rpe 8mo agoBecause of how policies are grouped together in many countries (particularly the US), the fight against fascism is necessarily concurrent with the fight against climate change.
- xyzelement 8mo ago[flagged]
- zoklet-enjoyer 8mo agoMore or less normal? Look around you. Look outside of your community. Does this seem normal?
- hackyhacky 8mo ago> the world would end the day Trump became president Have you been reading the news lately? Things are not going well.
- xyzelement 8mo agoI've been reading the news accross views and geographies for a looong time. Many people would say things are going great with a lot of long-standing problems getting solved.
- jmye 8mo ago"Many people" "a lot of long-standing problems getting solved" Weasel words. How many? Who, specifically? Which problems have actually been solved and aren't just "solved" via people metaphorically standing on an aircraft carrier with a "Mission Accomplished" sign pretending they've been solved?
- superxpro12 8mo agook so this has to be a bot or propaganda account. The US is checking a new box every day in the quest to parallel Nazi Germany. Immigrant Concentration camps? Check Elimination of public education in favor of religious private school? Check Remove all free press in the government? Check Remove all free press in the military? Check Embrace "Unitary Executive Theory"? (Sure sounds a lot like when Hitler removed the legislature to me) Check. Create an army of brown-shirts? Sorry i mean ICE Agents... Check Fuck literal children and suppress all evidence? Check Like... what EXACTLY is normal about this??????
- acdha 8mo agoThis is a function of your personal media diet: when you spend time consuming rationalizations funded by the fossil fuel industry, it’s easy to deride people who were right as “screamers” and the longer you do so the easier it is to project your intellectual failure onto nebulous “other” people you don’t know. It’s not your fault that climate change is costing lives and billions of dollars, the people who tried to stop it were engaged in hyperbole. It’s not your fault that people are being illegally killed, assaulted, or detained, it’s their fault for allowing you to ignore the clear evidence that this was going to happen.
- ghurtado 8mo ago"many people are saying my comments are the greatest on all of hacker News. Maybe the whole Internet. Who knows, but people are saying it" Imagine being so in love with a reality TV clown that you end up talking and thinking like a toddler for the rest of your life just to imitate him.
- unethical_ban 8mo agoIn my social circle of liberal people, the reason is despondence. Climate change has been known for decades now, and despite the alarms and concerns, the current administration is cheerfully, maliciously removing all initiatives in the US to combat it. Attempting to destroy the solar industry and wind power. Rolling back the most common sense environmental controls for public health. Meanwhile our country has had its place in the world destroyed irrevocably (for at least a generation) and is turning further and further away from a country that cares for its citizens and its freedoms. People are losing hope, not interest, because climate change and fascism are are more alarming than ever and our government is complicit. Long standing problems are not being solved.
- Fricken 8mo agoI haven't seen much fight against either fascism or climate change so far in the US
- timacles 8mo agoWhat a coincidence that any fight that might impact corporate profits is always the “left’s” interest.
- knicholes 8mo ago[flagged]
- hackyhacky 8mo agoYes, everyone is a gullible NPC, except you.
- avereveard 8mo agoas soon as there was money to be made by concentrating data center, no matter the energy density impact on environment, the once philanthropist changed tune real quick https://www.gatesnotes.com/home/home-page-topic/reader/three-tough-truths-about-climate https://www.gatesnotes.com/home/home-page-topic/reader/three... with gems like "Although climate change will hurt poor people more than anyone else, for the vast majority of them it will not be the only or even the biggest threat to their lives and welfare. "
- bena 8mo agoWe've had other existential threats to worry about of late. People are way more alarmed by Rapid Local Temperature Rises By Mechanism of Thermonuclear Energy Being Suddenly Released.
- afh1 8mo ago[flagged]
- hackyhacky 8mo agoPolls say otherwise. 63 percent of Americans are worried you about the environment. Attempts to minimize the danger of climate change, as you have just done, are usually politically motivated. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/ https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/yc...
- xyzelement 8mo agoLol this is SUCH a great data set. People say "yes" to every question except "do I think climate change will affect me personally" and "I talk about it to people in my life" - two metrics that could actually translate to "care"
- fragmede 8mo agoRich people with no real concerns is one way to put it. The idea that my children, or my children's children, won't have food to eat or water to drink? I don't know that it is a concern reserved for the rich. That is certainly one viewpoint, and you gotta be some level of rich to have kids in the first place.
- latexr 8mo agoAre you based in the US? Seeing how the current regime is doing its best to gut climate protections I get how it could seem that way, but it’s definitely not the case in e.g. Europe where energy from renewables continues to grow.
- missedthecue 8mo agoMost countries including the US are deploying record amounts of renewables. But the climate conversation is definitely reduced, and that's global. Its been a good while since I saw angsty euro teens throwing tomato soup on paintings or gluing themselves to motorways. That used to be a monthly occurance.
- pjc50 8mo agoThat was .. last year? There's a "top of stack" effect in that there can be only a certain number of issues which are most important in discourse, and the Israel/Iran situation has taken over the top of discourse as has the US President. A vital part of good governance is caring about things which aren't in today's newspaper.
- missedthecue 8mo agoNo, it was more of a 2023 thing, which is now three years ago. It had definitely calmed down by 2025 too. Iran situation is only a few days old.
- latexr 8mo agoThe US still produces more than half (58%) of its electricity from fossil fuels. In the EU, it’s less than a third (29%). https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/united-states-of-america/ https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/united-states... https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/european-union/ https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/european-unio... In the EU I hear of new climate initiatives all the time. From the US every bit of news I know about is how they’re making it worse.
- f6v 8mo agoThe problem is, no amount of climate policies in the West is going to offset burning fuel in the developing counties. It’s a global phenomenon and addressing it locally is futile. That, and you don’t have the luxury of green solutions when energy prices were going through the roof.
- rounce 8mo agoSurely it's better to be more reliant on domestically/locally produced wind and solar when oil and gas production by 3rd party countries is plummeting?
- hackyhacky 8mo ago> addressing it locally is futile. Imagine what could be accomplished if Americans used their global influence to affect global change on climate issues with the same zeal that they pursue manipulative trade deals.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- wolttam 8mo agoSomeone needs to set the example and be the model?
- nyeah 8mo agoNice take on the trolley problem. "No amount of pulling the emergency brakes is going to prevent passengers from dying when this runaway train finally crashes. So let's be responsible adults and put the pedal to the metal."
- marginalia_nu 8mo agoEveryone and their mother is running digital influence operations, so the overall media landscape is just extremely noisy right now. This is an art that has been refined with every election cycle and every major political event since the early 2010s, and it had already gotten dang bad 5-6 years ago[1], and definitely did not get an ounce better once LLMs came along and drove the down the cost of this type of op. The result is that it's very hard to get any sort of coherent message across. [1] 'member the absolute clown fiesta surrounding COVID?
- mchaver 8mo agoI assume because the public has been consumed by narratives over data. Narratives have probably always been more powerful than data for us humans, but we now have really powerful tools to generate the narratives we like. Combine that with algorithmic feeds that prefer certain types of narratives, boring and/or annoying data gets ignored.
- pjc50 8mo agoWell, yes, due to systematic propaganda efforts and the general shift from being against mass death to being in favor of it. (the Iran collapse that led to mass protests and then mass murder of the mass protests is itself a climate driven issue https://www.unicef.org/iran/en/climate-change https://www.unicef.org/iran/en/climate-change )
- nDRDY 8mo agoThe messaging on "global tipping points" was over-done, and also many people are now aware that enforcing low-carbon policies is costing Western economies a huge amount of money while resulting in very little net reduction in global CO2 output. Why care when we're already over the edge and there isn't anything we can do about it?
- superxpro12 8mo agoSeriously? I see anti-global-warming propaganda every day. Every f'ing time it snows someone has to snide in with "BuT I ThOuGhT GlObAl WaRmInG WaS ReAl!?!?!?!?!" And i have to take a breath.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- mitthrowaway2 8mo agoWell, this did hit #1 on HN. A bunch of us might actually still be worried about it.
- Pxtl 8mo agoBecause of first COVID-19 and the post-peak economic chaos distracting us, and then afterwards Trump and Putin and Netenyahu and the global rise of erratic mayhem as a political platform. https://xkcd.com/2275/ https://xkcd.com/2275/ Eventually we'll have to deal with the Giant Spider Downtown, it's just that the to-do list is growing from the top.
- superxpro12 8mo agoIt's foolish to assume this is not a calculated effort. It's make us feel good that there isn't people who are actually evil enough to coordinate these full-blown authoritarian campaigns. Consider for a moment that there ARE people this straight-up evil....
- Pxtl 8mo agoMaybe for Putin, but for Trump it's hard to see it as anything but his completely mercurial nature just causing so much random melodrama that less-urgent problems completely vanish. The same people who love carbon also hate the damage he's doing to global markets. I mean except Putin again.
- dboreham 8mo agoI'm in the US and even here this is absolutely not true. It has disappeared as a government concern, because the government has been subverted by vested interests.
- mixdup 8mo agoThis is the biggest headscratcher about AI. Before 2020 every big tech company had a net neutral, if not net negative, carbon goal. And many of them were talking about not just buying offsets but actual neutrality. And others were talking about even accounting for the emissions caused by their customers using their products LLMs hit the market and you never hear anyone talk about carbon at all. At all. Maybe Apple will mention it a little bit but they're not in the big datacenter game The costs of LLMs are just being completely paved over. We don't let manufacturers dump cadmium into the rivers in the US anymore, even if it would enable cheap or magic products, it's insane that we're just ignoring all the external impacts in this particular area
- jordanb 8mo agoThey're grifters. They thought climate tech would be a big grift. When that slowed down they dropped it like last season's trendy outfit and jumped on the AI bandwagon.
- alberto467 8mo agoI think a lot of people have lost faith in the ability of the world to come all together and make the necessary sacrifices to make a difference. Especially when some parts of the world are in competition with each other and not making these sacrifices allows them an edge. Also another group of people have realized they are not willing to forgo all their petty and unnecessary comforts nor are they willing to pay any price increases that would be required to adopt less economical but more sustainable services or production methods. I don't think there's been any big change in climate change believers/deniers, but i do think some people have started accepting that we're doomed and that there is no "practical" solution. And if you think you're doomed, you might as well skip the sacrifices and enjoy your last days (decades) to the fullest.
- bondarchuk 8mo ago"People aren't willing to pay price increases" is interesting. Of course that's what they say when you ask them directly. Yet everyone is currently paying massive price increases as a result of covid-era money printing. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily but what it shows it that it has been possible in very recent times that a collecive decision was made which increased general prices for everyone.
- jmye 8mo agoPeople are largely unaware of the sources of those price increases, at least in the US, which is why they were such a successful bludgeon in recent elections.
- alberto467 8mo ago> that a collecive decision was made which increased general prices for everyone I think you're referring to inflation with that? I wouldn't necessarily say that inflation is the result of a "decision", certainly not a direct decision of any single person nor any collective group. Economies can move around in weird and unpredictable ways, and they are also quite intertwined at the global level making policy decisions even more complicated and unpredictable. The "money printing" decision wasn't made by asking the public: "would you like to help our economy and businesses and our essential public services in this tragic event? Oh btw you'll be paying for all of this with inflation, are you still sure?". Politicians tend to conveniently leave the second part out, and also, this questions wasn't asked to the public at all. I believe a sizeable amount of the public would've responded "no, let the people die, let the businesses die, i'm not paying for them". Which is why for example, in many democracies with tools of direct democracy, such tools cannot affect fiscal policy, because people are dumb and they would just say "i want all of the welfare and zero of the taxes", bringing the country to ruin.
- mrweasel 8mo agoDenmark is having a parliamentary election in 18 days, and other than one of the left wing parties, it seems like no one gives a shit about environmental issues right now. Even the debate about clean drinking water is a bit one sided, where part of the left want to implement measures to secure it, while the right is "Fuck it, fixing it will hurt our heavily subsidized farmers". Part of the problem seems to be that many countries won't do shit, so all the improvements that have been made are just completely negated by other poluting more.