mixdup

4 ms·

1.
by mixdup 7d ago
Would it be detectable to some goon at the border? Probably not. They'd put in the sanitized password, see nothing, and let the person go. If it gets seized and an FBI or CIA analyst gets ahold of it, then yeah the smart guys are going
2.
by mixdup 7d ago
all of our police are essentially paramilitary now. There's nothing special about ICE or CBP other than they're federal rather than local. Even local cops have become hyper-militarized and think they're patrolling the streets
3.
by mixdup 7d ago
Not for this they can't. They can seize your belongings but they can't detain you for something that isn't a crime and they cannot prevent you from entering the country if you're a citizen. You have an absolute right per
4.
by mixdup 7d ago
It will, one day, be changed to 200 miles (or more) on a whim
5.
by mixdup 7d ago
You can pre-clear US customs and immigration in a number of Canadian airports, including Halifax
6.
by mixdup 10d ago
Did you get their permission before running this test?
7.
by mixdup 11d ago
This is what I don't understand. I'll be the first to stand up and say there's a lot about IPv6 I don't know, but why can't/doesn't the router learn how to talk to the host when the host sends that outboun
8.
GM gives its most important trucks a new UI–and includes CarPlay(arstechnica.com)
2 points by mixdup 11d ago|1 comments
9.
by mixdup 11d ago
So much for owning the entire software stack top to bottom. Guess the 20% of people who don't care if a vehicle has CarPlay/Android Auto aren't enough to sustain new car sales
10.
by mixdup 11d ago
We don't even do it that way with people
11.
by mixdup 12d ago
> but if we only check the correctness at the end, then isn't it possible that it already collided with an obstacle? You would put the check before it actually does the thing. It's at the "end" of the process of figur
12.
by mixdup 12d ago
This kind of seems like a no-brainer. Instead of just letting a model have unfettered "physical" ability to do things and hope you can cognitively control it, why not let the AI do whatever it wants, but its access to the tools go
13.
by mixdup 12d ago
It's really easy to be profitable when you exclude all of your expenses
14.
by mixdup 12d ago
The CEO doesn't necessarily have to have the ideas. How many ideas do you think Tim Cook had regarding products at Apple?
15.
by mixdup 17d ago
I mean, there's only so much that a watch can do or that can be packed into it. Eventually all gadget categories fall into a lull of slow and steady progress, they can't all be absolute bangers year after year
16.
by mixdup 18d ago
Yeah, there is no way to back out consumers vs. revenue at basically any big company. They all report "ARPU" or average revenue per user, because there is always a spectrum of pricing, almost never a single price. Between bundle p
17.
by mixdup 22d ago
I almost mentioned that situation in my reply, but that's kind of the exception that proves the rule. Even in that case, someone should need to physically intervene, especially with high profile people like politicians or celebrities
18.
by mixdup 22d ago
I'm not quite sure what immigration has to do with a national ID system in the US. Seems like you just wanted to bring that up to be able to say "man that'd be so much easier if you got rid of all the immigrants" which i
19.
by mixdup 22d ago
People are against national IDs because of privacy, not racism like a previous comment in this thread suggested People are against requiring certain types of IDs to vote as racism or other forms of voter suppression because it may cost mone
20.
by mixdup 22d ago
The problem in the US is that the government doesn't necessarily have all of your details. Most people's ID is a driver's license, but you're not mandated to have one of those. The federal government doesn't control
21.
by mixdup 22d ago
I feel like that should require an in-person visit, as troublesome as that might be. A picture of an ID is not the same thing as presenting the actual ID
22.
by mixdup 22d ago
they probably haven't had the new elevator in operation for a whole year yet, so they're likely extrapolating. also, they won't really know the true usage of the elevator over the whole year so they're kind of guessing.
23.
by mixdup 22d ago
You will still be making transmissions on the illegal frequencies even if there is no one on the other end of the connection
24.
by mixdup 22d ago
It's imperialist to own and control the thing you created? If .gov had been an international TLD that was at some point available to everyone, or had been created by everyone, ok. But .gov was created as part of the work the US governm
25.
by mixdup 23d ago
>Cuban is saying they don't even do that - they don't track their costs on a surgery by surgey basis at all. And because they don't track any of that it's impossible to reason about it. Then Cuban is wrong. I had a he
26.
by mixdup 23d ago
This is why urgent care exists and is why if you don't have something that you think is life threatening, that's almost always better. If you need more than they can provide, they can and very much will forward you on to an ER
27.
by mixdup 23d ago
The ER vs. having a regular doctor is a big impact. It's partially why there are so many urgent care centers, but a lot of uninsured use the ER as their primary care as the ER has a duty under law (and ethics) to treat anyone who comes
28.
by mixdup 23d ago
there's more expensive equipment than just an x-ray machine and MRI machines, those were just examples. The building itself is expensive. Having the labor there ready to respond and service patients is expensive. Overall there is a ton
29.
by mixdup 23d ago
Because they are going to allocate as much as they can to that service that is actually using those advanced facilities. The stiches patient in the ER is carrying some load for the cardiac surgery suite just not as much as the person who ac
30.
by mixdup 23d ago
The thing is he'd find a lot of the "unnecessary overhead" is necessary to deal with the payers in the system. You need a massive billing organization to make sure insurance actually pays you. You need a massive compliance or

More ›