3 ms·
Sorry. I meant "peer reviewed prior to publication" as the phrase is presently used. I thought that was obvious. What you're calling "peer review" is what I
by MarkusQ 8mo ago
Sorry. I meant "peer reviewed prior to publication" as the phrase is presently used. I thought that was obvious.
What you're calling "peer review" is what I would call "discussed" or "debated" which it certainly was.
I dispute your claim that the new paradigm is superior.
- bonsai_spool 8mo ago> Sorry. I meant "peer reviewed prior to publication" as the phrase is presently used. Accepted. But now there is Arxiv and Biorxiv and even Medrxiv—so we're back to where things were, it seems.