3 ms·

> I think she could have won if she had offered voters anything. But she did offer voters lots of things if you spent 30 seconds listening to her and stepped o

by tw04 9mo ago

> I think she could have won if she had offered voters anything. But she did offer voters lots of things if you spent 30 seconds listening to her and stepped out of the faux news and Twitter echo chambers. And basically every last bit of it would’ve helped the average American. She just didn’t lie and claim she had a magic wand to fix price gouging her first week in office. https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/sep/30/kamala-harris-2024-campaign-promises-here-are-her/ https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/sep/30/kamala-harris... *And to be clear, it’s rather interesting that both Kamala and Hillary were blamed for “not having a platform” which seems to be the go-to for people who refuse to vote for a woman but can’t actually attack them on their platform. Just claim they don't have one or didn’t do a good enough job explaining it!

nathan_compton 9mo ago
Politicians should not preemptively give in to political resistance and tell their voters they can't solve their problems because its "unrealistic." You'd think we would have figured this out in the Clinton campaign. Politicians should have a set of goals they fight for rabidly and when political resistance manifests they should point their fingers at it and say "Those assholes over there kept me from forgiving student loans." Democrats who believe in "realistic" political campaigns are why awful people keep winning.
- tw04 9mo ago
  I thought you said she didn’t have a platform? Now you’re criticizing her for “giving in to political resistance” - and by that you mean not getting up on stage and just knowingly and blatantly lying to the American public by claiming she would single handedly drop the price of groceries and gasoline in her first week in office while also ending the war in Ukraine? I think you’re both moving the goal posts and claiming that the rest of us are looking for a presidential candidate that has no moral compass. I’m good.
  - nathan_compton 9mo ago
    Like I said, I canvassed for and voted for Harris, but when I think of her campaign, all I can think of is "wiping the debt of Pell Grant recipients who start successful businesses that benefit disadvantaged communities." This is the lamest bullshit policy which almost seems calculated to alienate voters who it doesn't put to sleep. Please don't act like democratic politicians are losing because they have a moral compass. Ridiculous.
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
matwood 9mo ago
> She just didn’t lie and claim she had a magic wand to fix price gouging her first week in office. This is part of Trumps genius and preys on many American's ignorance. Ask random people on the street if they understand the inflation rate for example. Most issues are complex and require nuance and complex fixes. Trump distills them down to simple problems when they are not, and lies with impunity that there are simple solutions. People believe him because it's too much work to believe anything else.

by tw04 9mo ago

nathan_compton 9mo ago

Politicians should not preemptively give in to political resistance and tell their voters they can't solve their problems because its "unrealistic." You'd think we would have figured this out in the Clinton campaign. Politicians should have a set of goals they fight for rabidly and when political resistance manifests they should point their fingers at it and say "Those assholes over there kept me from forgiving student loans." Democrats who believe in "realistic" political campaigns are why awful people keep winning.

tw04 9mo ago
I thought you said she didn’t have a platform? Now you’re criticizing her for “giving in to political resistance” - and by that you mean not getting up on stage and just knowingly and blatantly lying to the American public by claiming she would single handedly drop the price of groceries and gasoline in her first week in office while also ending the war in Ukraine? I think you’re both moving the goal posts and claiming that the rest of us are looking for a presidential candidate that has no moral compass. I’m good.
- nathan_compton 9mo ago
  Like I said, I canvassed for and voted for Harris, but when I think of her campaign, all I can think of is "wiping the debt of Pell Grant recipients who start successful businesses that benefit disadvantaged communities." This is the lamest bullshit policy which almost seems calculated to alienate voters who it doesn't put to sleep. Please don't act like democratic politicians are losing because they have a moral compass. Ridiculous.
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]

matwood 9mo ago

> She just didn’t lie and claim she had a magic wand to fix price gouging her first week in office. This is part of Trumps genius and preys on many American's ignorance. Ask random people on the street if they understand the inflation rate for example. Most issues are complex and require nuance and complex fixes. Trump distills them down to simple problems when they are not, and lies with impunity that there are simple solutions. People believe him because it's too much work to believe anything else.