4 ms·
Supply should increase as a response to higher prices, this bringing prices down.
by UltraSane 10mo ago
Supply should increase as a response to higher prices, this bringing prices down.
- dandanua 10mo agoin a fairy world
- YetAnotherNick 10mo agoNo just stop being cynical. The reason almost every electronic item is cheaper now than 2 decades back is just becuase the demand(and thus supply) is higher.
- coderenegade 10mo agoI can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. I'd argue it's more the result of the CCP bankrolling the Chinese electronics industry to the point where roughly 70% of all electronics goods are produced in China. The concentration of expertise and supply chains is staggering, and, imo, was really born out of geopolitical strategy.
- YetAnotherNick 10mo agoNo, its not. Transistors used to cost $1. Now they cost $1/billion or something. It's all because the 10s of billions of fixed cost incurred by fab is shared among customers. If we create less chips, the fixed cost wont reduce.
- Ray20 10mo ago> of the CCP bankrolling the Chinese electronics industry to the point where roughly 70% of all electronics goods are produced in China. But we don't see this bankrolling in absolute values. Rather, it's due to regressive taxation, low (cheap) social security for workers, and very weak intellectual property protection.
- abenga 10mo agoHow does this square with some companies just stopping sales to consumers altogether?
- arnaudsm 10mo agoThat's economical theory, but the real world is often non-linear. Crucial is dead. There's a finite amount of rare earth. Wars and floods can bankrupt industries, supply chains are tight.
- lotsofpulp 10mo agoThe business that owns crucial is producing more chips than ever. Rare earth metals are in the dirt around the world. Supply and demand curves shifting, hence prices increasing (and decreasing) is an expected part of life due to the inability to see the future.
- mschuster91 10mo ago> Rare earth metals are in the dirt around the world. They are. The problem is, the machinery to extract and refine them, and especially to make them into chips, takes years to build. We're looking at a time horizon of almost a decade if you include planning, permits and R&D. And given that almost everyone but the AI bros expects the AI bubble to burst rather sooner than later (given that the interweb of funding and deals more resembles the Habsburg family tree than anything healthy) and the semiconductor industry is infamous for pretty toxic supply/demand boom-bust cycles, they are all preferring to err on the side of caution - particularly as we're not talking about single billion dollar amounts any more. TSMC Arizona is projected to cost 165 billion dollars [1] - other than the US government and cash-flush Apple, I don't even know anyone able, much less willing to finance such a project under the current conditions. Apple at least can make use of TSMCs fab capacity when the AI bros go bust... [1] https://www.tsmc.com/static/abouttsmcaz/index.htm https://www.tsmc.com/static/abouttsmcaz/index.htm
- m4rtink 10mo agoAren't rare earth metals used mainly for batteries, not chips ? I guess people might be mixing up all the headlines of all the articles they did not read by this point.
- 10mo ago
- atq2119 10mo agoAs usual, the problem is: how fast does this happen?
- InsideOutSanta 10mo agoAs far as I can tell, none of the companies producing memory chips are increasing production because they don't know if the current demand is sustainable. Increasing memory production capacity is a multi-year project, but in a few years, the LLM companies creating the current demand might all have run out of money. If demand craters just as supply increases, prices will drastically decrease, which none of these companies want.
- xadhominemx 10mo agoYou are wrong. Memory production is being expanded in 2026 and will expand further in 2027 and 2028 as the memory suppliers catch up on fab shell capacity.
- Ekaros 10mo agoRational actors in game know that this demand spike is most likely temporary. So investing in more production only to face glut in future dropping margins to nearly nothing is not rational move. This has been played out before so it is only natural that they are careful with increasing the supply. And while they don't response they are netting larger margins than before. Obvious end result is that demand will drop as price goes up. The other natural part of supply-demand curve.
- 63stack 10mo agoThe blessing the plebs with eternal wisdom comment. Take a look at GPU prices and how that "supply increased thus bringing the prices down"