Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arnaudsm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Data Broker Radaris Loses Domains in Privacy Fight
(krebsonsecurity.com)
16 points
by
arnaudsm
10d ago
|
3 comments
2.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10d ago
It's the fear of being left behind that fuels both these things.
3.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10d ago
Omitting half of the story is misleading, this isn't a pro/anti LLM story. Vibecoding has been the norm for months, it's the embargo violation today that triggered his resignation.
4.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10d ago
Misleading title, there's another major reason: it's an embargo agreement violation that jeopardizes Linux support on PS5. https://x.com/theflow0/status/2099987019954831744
5.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
Variable refresh rate displays are becoming popular in smartphones and PCs, hopefully this won't be a technical issue soon.
6.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
[deleted]
7.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
That's economical theory, but the real world is often non-linear. Crucial is dead. There's a finite amount of rare earth. Wars and floods can bankrupt industries, supply chains are tight.
8.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
Thank you for the detailed answer!
9.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
What's the optimal strategy then ? 50 GB Blu-ray remux => 3 GB AV1 ?
10.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
Google Chrome is likely around $400M, while Mozilla's core browser team is around $200M but are technologically far behind. Hard to find precise numbers, it's just an order of magnitude estimate
11.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
The standard can be forward compatible. A light website is always great, you're using one right now.
12.
▲
by
arnaudsm
9mo ago
There's an elephant in the room: why is maintaining a web browser costing $400M/y? The web standards are growing faster than non-profit engines can implement them. Google & Apple are bloating the web specs in what looks like r
13.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
#1 models are usually priced at 2x more than the competition, and they often decrease the price right when they lose the crown.
14.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
Running an LLM by default when I open your site is the most energy-consuming thing a computer can do, and the thing consumers hate the most in 2025.
15.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
Could be optimized for benchmarks, but Gemini 3 has been stellar for my tasks so far. Maybe an architectural leap?
16.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
Geometric mean of MMMLU + GPQA-Diamond + SimpleQA + LiveCodeBench : - Gemini 3.0 Pro : 84.8 - DeepSeek 3.2 : 83.6 - GPT-5.1 : 69.2 - Claude Opus 4.5 : 67.4 - Kimi-K2 (1.2T) : 42.0 - Mistral La
17.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
Now that SO is almost dead, how will the AI labs train their LLMs on all the programming edge cases it used to document? Will synthetic data and documentation RAG really be enough? Or will we be stuck at 2022 debugging knowledge forever?
18.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
This is great, I wish tech giants focused more on latency. Gmail, Notion, Facebook, are painfully slow on my high-end laptop with gigabit ethernet. Something is wrong in our modern engineering culture.
19.
▲
by
arnaudsm
10mo ago
The Gemini protocol started in 2019, before Google's Gemini in 2023. It's proably a popular word for tech workers fans of the american space race.
20.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
Sorry Stan, forgot about the Lynx, huge fan of your work!
21.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
@dang this post title was editorialized against the rules, and is highly misleading. Should we revert it ?
22.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
I'm glad em dashes exist, they help me spot AI spam.
23.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
This is the first standalone headset with an open ecosystem. That's a big deal. Meta Quests & Apple Visions require developer verification to run your own software, and provide no root access, which slowed down innovation significa
24.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
Most FAANG executive and engineers use premium plans or AdBlockers, they probably don't care or even notice how dangerous their products are getting.
25.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
OpenAI burns <5B$/year in inference. They're raising that money to hyperscale larger models.
26.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
I highly recommend this talk at the American Astronomical Society from last year, which talks about the engineering culture at NASA and why Artemis has been slower than Apollo so far. https://youtu.be/OoJsPvmFixU?t=1112
27.
▲
by
arnaudsm
11mo ago
Genuine question : why are hyperscalers like OpenAI and Oracle raising hundreds of billions ? Isn't their current infra enough ? Naive napkin math : a GB200 NVL72 is 3M$, can serve ~7000 concurrent users of gpt4o (rumored to be 1400B A
28.
▲
by
arnaudsm
1y ago
This is exciting, exceptionally the firmware & binary blob foundations that are the biggest roadblock. Concerning the UI, I wish we had another attempt at a web-based mobile OS. FirefoxOS was too early, but APIs are much more mature now
29.
▲
by
arnaudsm
1y ago
Why would you need bipedism for a flying object ? Wouldn't a quadripod + quadcopter setup would be much more stable and cheaper ?
30.
▲
by
arnaudsm
1y ago
Are you referring to the llama 4 cheating ? I cannot find any reference to llama 1 cheating
More ›