13 ms·
The issue with this type of motor is that it is part of the unsprung weight since it is inside the wheel. This is probably why savings here matter a lot more (o
by nmehner 11mo ago
The issue with this type of motor is that it is part of the unsprung weight since it is inside the wheel. This is probably why savings here matter a lot more (or at least in a very different way) than the battery weight.
- Kaibeezy 11mo agoSee also the Saab Emily GT project. Even with an older, heavier gen of these axial flux motors they found significant performance gains by controlling each wheel via its own motor. https://electrek.co/2023/04/27/saab-engineers-develop-secret-nevs-emily-gt-electric-car-project/ https://electrek.co/2023/04/27/saab-engineers-develop-secret...
- nmehner 11mo agoI didn't want to put the usability of the motor into question or go into a complete evaluation of advantages/disadvantages :) This was just an explanation that weight trimming the motor might be very much worth the effort - even if it somewhat "insignificant" compared with savings that are possible in battery weight.
- close04 11mo agoYASA doesn't call it a hub motor specifically but that's one place where it helps to save as much weight as possible. And for the cars most likely to have 1000+HP weight matters too. A Tesla motor weighs 100-200lbs, so saving that much weight down to 28lbs on a supercar is highly desirable. I think large drones will be another place where a downsized version of this motor will make a huge difference, assuming the power scales nicely with size.
- rob74 11mo agoOk, now I understand why this motor is only used in supercars - installing four (or even only two - according to https://www.mercedes-benz.de/passengercars/technology/concept-amg-gt-xx-amg-ea.html#technology-and-innovation https://www.mercedes-benz.de/passengercars/technology/concep..., even the AMG GT-XX has "only" three of them) hub motors with twice the power of a Tesla Model 3 in any other car would be ridiculous. So, the actual challenge is to make this motor even smaller while keeping the same power to weight ratio, so it can also be used for regular cars? That is, if they want to build something for the mass market, not only for an exclusive clientele?
- eru 11mo agoWell, Tesla also started with the higher end of the market. That's where people are willing to pay more.
- thelastgallon 11mo agoBut why limit only to cars? Can this be used for motorcycles, e-bikes, electric buses, train wheels, e-unicycles, electric golf carts, etc? There are probably a range of application where in-wheel makes perfect sense.
- tckk 11mo agoDonut Labs markets a whole suite of axial flux motors. Sized from scooters through to large trucks. But no public pricing.
- exasperaited 11mo agoMotorcycles I could imagine. Do e-bikes really need significantly more power than they have? They already run arguably dangerously fast for their application. Is efficiency not the primary target there?
- varispeed 11mo agoIf engine can be produced cheaply, can it be limited "in software"? It's like saying people shouldn't use Rasberry Pi to blink an LED.
- bidatzi 11mo agoWhy would it have to be unsprung? They are not unsprung in the vehicle shown in the article.
- Zanfa 11mo agoI might be wrong, but I don’t think these motors are intended to be used inside the wheel. That would add a ton of additional requirements in terms of physical durability as well as constrain optimal torque and RPM of the motor design.
- mbfg 11mo agoI believe the Aptera was originally going to have motors in the wheels... My understanding is the the first version will forego that, as there were challenges i guess, but i think they still to eventually do that.
- Braxton1980 11mo agoI believe caring about unsprung weight only matters for handling not efficiency
- jama211 11mo agoWhere does it say it’s inside the wheel? Not sure about that
- scoobytuber 11mo agoHe’s holding the motor in the picture. That format is in-wheel BLDC.
- doph 11mo agoIn-wheel application is possible, but it's important to understand that the pancake shape is only a consequence of the axial flux design and Yasa doesn't make motors in other "formats". Yasa motors shaped like this have been used in several supercars and all of them have been in-board on the axles, not in-wheel.
- imtringued 11mo agoThat format is the standard format for axial flux motors...
- jama211 11mo agoI don’t believe it is in this case.
- rdtsc 11mo ago> This is probably why savings here matter a lot more (or at least in a very different way) than the battery weight. Wouldn't that make it worse or just ... different. Before this the unsprung weight wouldn't have had a motor in there and now it does. Increasing the unsprung weight doesn't seem a like a good thing.
- jakogut 11mo agoWhat current mass production EVs use hub motors? It seems a lot more sensible to have the motors inboard, mounted to the chassis, and drive the wheel(s) with axle shafts. It seems in my searching this is how nearly all EVs are currently designed and produced.