3 ms·
I really loved using Claude. I like working with Claude more than GPT or Gemini. Claude is to LLMs what Firefox is to browsers. I just like Firefox more than Ch
by adventured 1y ago
I really loved using Claude. I like working with Claude more than GPT or Gemini. Claude is to LLMs what Firefox is to browsers. I just like Firefox more than Chrome. It's very clearly behind GPT Codex at this point though. So far I've found Gemini for front-end design work to be better than the others, and I pair it with GPT for everything else. Hopefully Gemini 3 is a solid improvement, I like having at least two LLMs at high quality to run against each other.
- stavros 1y agoClaude Code is much better than Codex CLI, but GPT 5 Codex is much better than Sonnet 4.5. I wish I could use one with the other, but alas.
- nostrebored 1y agoThere are tools like claude-code-router. I've gone through the pain of getting gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, and other models wired together. The system prompt differences are too much though I think, claude still feels the best in claude code. I'm at the point where I have so much built up around claude code workflows that claude feels very good. But when I don't use them, I find that I immensely prefer gpt-5 (and for harder, design influencing questions, grok-4 heavy which is not available behind an API)
- stavros 1y agoYeah, I think the system prompts are so optimised for the specific model that others won't work as well, so it kind of defeats the purpose of being able to plug your own model in. I wish I could, but I know I won't get as good performance as with the model's native cli.
- embedding-shape 1y agoAlso the models themselves are likely trained with the tools they'll likely have available in mind, and what harness they'll run in, and vice-versa. It's noticeable when you setup some semi-fixed workflow against some model, and when you try to switch to a different family of models, the performance and accuracy notably change.