4 ms·
> Exercise doesn't spend enough energy for high calories foods to be worth it. If you want to lose weight that is. Tell that to all the lean 150 pound / 68kg r
by reducesuffering 1y ago
> Exercise doesn't spend enough energy for high calories foods to be worth it. If you want to lose weight that is.
Tell that to all the lean 150 pound / 68kg runners stuffing their faces with high calorie foods all the time.
- zanellato19 1y ago_Athletes_ are completely different from the normal people looking to exercise. Can you spend 4 hours of your day exercising?
- paulpauper 1y agoIf you are single and short commute, it is doable. People spend hours watching TV, looking at phone.
- zanellato19 1y agoI don't think it's reasonable. That becomes basically the only thing to do outside of work. Highly unlikely at the very least.
- Melatonic 1y agoIf most people really wanted to I think they could. Split it into multiple blocks
- nradov 1y agoEven most professional endurance athletes rarely hit 28 hours per week of actual training time. That would be like a peak week in a training plan before tapering leading up to a race.
- reducesuffering 1y agoEven more contrary to GP's claim, the top American marathoners are only doing ~13 hour weeks of running before their races. It's public data on Strava.
- reducesuffering 1y agoTry only 4 hours a week of exercise. Most lean runners are only getting that amount of time running in and still eating high calories, because 4 hours of running is ~2,500 extra calories burned every single week.
- senko 1y agoYou're replying to a person saying "exercise doesn't spend enough energy [...] if you want to lose weight" by referencing "lean 68kg runners". Do you think they want to lose weight?
- reducesuffering 1y agoI wanted to lose weight. I ran a lot (only 5 hours out of the week), ate the same high caloric foods, and lost a lot of weight. Clearly GP's assertion isn't correct, because enough exercise does lose weight.