3 ms·

I’m surprised that big data centers aren’t just locating in proximity to nuclear plants that can probably easily supply the extra power and reasonable rates.

whimsicalism 1y ago
i think that is a large part of what they are doing, although unfortunately so far most of the collocation has been gas turbines due to the shorter timelines
maxerickson 1y ago
Why would nuclear plants mostly be running below capacity?
- jacquesm 1y ago
  Well, technically they always are, but the GP suggested that there was a lot of spare capacity and there really isn't. The WNA has a nice set of graphs about this, which show 80%+ utilization and that's not too far from the practical limit. https://world-nuclear.org/our-association/publications/world-nuclear-performance-report/global-nuclear-industry-performance https://world-nuclear.org/our-association/publications/world...
  - crote 1y ago
    It's a side effect of the economics of nuclear power. The cost of the nuclear fuel is more-or-less a rounding error. On the other hand, personnel has to be paid no matter at what load the reactor is operating, and paying back the construction loan is also a fixed monthly fee. This means running a nuclear reactor at 10% costs about the same as running it at 100%, so running it at anything but full capacity means you are losing out on potential income. Running it at 10% capacity means having to sell that electricity at 10x the usual rate! Combine this with the incredibly high risks involved in such a massive long-term investment, and most reactors operate on a "strike price" principle: they negotiate a fixed electricity rate with the government, and the government has to pay (or gets to keep) the difference between the market rate and the strike price. More importantly, this applies to all the electricity the reactor could sell: if the reactor is able to generate power but the grid operator for one reason or another wants to source it somewhere else, the reactor operator still gets paid. All this means nuclear reactors can only really be used to supply base load. In an ideal world we'd want to use them as peaker plants to make up for deficiencies left by solar and wind, but in practice we'll be turning off wind farms to let nuclear reactors run. Nuclear power might've made sense a couple of decades ago, but there just isn't a place for them left in a modern renewable-heavy grid.
    - jacquesm 1y ago
      As long as you stay under 5%/minute or so, yes, you can with the latest generation of nuclear plants. Above that there are other alternatives that are more suitable (pumped storage, natural gas fired turbines). And indeed, what you describe is exactly how it goes, nuclear power pretty much dictates the price of energy because it is the most expensive form. This is the big controversy of market based energy pricing to me. It should be the cheapest energy source that determines the price, not one of the most expensive ones.
      - orwin 1y ago
        I don't think nuclear ever dictated SPOT electricity prices in Europe. Gas, pulsed coal, or Steps do though.
        jacquesm 1y ago
        I've recently looked into this in some detail and the situation is actually a lot more complex than you might think looking from the outside in. This is an interesting article on how energy markets arrive at their price (it is incomplete, and a bit dated, but still useful): https://neon.energy/Blume-Werry-Faber-Hirth-Huber-Everts-2021-Eye-on-the-price.pdf https://neon.energy/Blume-Werry-Faber-Hirth-Huber-Everts-202...
- brightball 1y ago
  I apparently made a bad assumption. I thought I remembered reading that nuclear plants were looking to shut down due to economics of electricity not being profitable for them anymore, which I assumed meant lack of demand. I also remembered seeing several articles about a crypto mining operation doing exactly that. - https://ignition-news.com/talen-energy-buys-out-a-nuclear-powered-crypto-mine/ https://ignition-news.com/talen-energy-buys-out-a-nuclear-po... - https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10052025/new-york-bitcoin-mines-buying-up-power-plants/ https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10052025/new-york-bitcoin... - https://www.power-eng.com/nuclear/nuclear-powered-bitcoin-mining-operations-ramp-up-in-pennsylvania/ https://www.power-eng.com/nuclear/nuclear-powered-bitcoin-mi... - https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/12/texas-power-plant-expansion-granbury-bitcoin-mine-pollution/ https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/12/texas-power-plant-ex... That last one is actually just a natural gas plant though.
- namibj 1y ago
  They don't need to for the location to be reasonable; you can use the grid connection with reverse power flow to feed the data center just fine. Leave enough to feed the coolant pumps in an outage though.
jacquesm 1y ago
Because (1) they are at or near capacity, (2) they are very costly to operate so those 'reasonable rates' are very hard to come by when using nuclear as power source. There are other, cheaper sources for power than nuclear that are more in line with what data center operators are willing to pay. There has been some talk of data centers with their own power plants. But usually that centers on fossil fuels rather than on nuclear. There are some efforts in that direction though: https://neutronbytes.com/2025/05/07/google-plans-three-600-mw-nuclear-projects-for-data-centers/ https://neutronbytes.com/2025/05/07/google-plans-three-600-m... And I'm aware of a much smaller scale project in Europe besides this one and there are probably others.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]

whimsicalism 1y ago

i think that is a large part of what they are doing, although unfortunately so far most of the collocation has been gas turbines due to the shorter timelines

maxerickson 1y ago

Why would nuclear plants mostly be running below capacity?

jacquesm 1y ago
Well, technically they always are, but the GP suggested that there was a lot of spare capacity and there really isn't. The WNA has a nice set of graphs about this, which show 80%+ utilization and that's not too far from the practical limit. https://world-nuclear.org/our-association/publications/world-nuclear-performance-report/global-nuclear-industry-performance https://world-nuclear.org/our-association/publications/world...
- crote 1y ago
  It's a side effect of the economics of nuclear power. The cost of the nuclear fuel is more-or-less a rounding error. On the other hand, personnel has to be paid no matter at what load the reactor is operating, and paying back the construction loan is also a fixed monthly fee. This means running a nuclear reactor at 10% costs about the same as running it at 100%, so running it at anything but full capacity means you are losing out on potential income. Running it at 10% capacity means having to sell that electricity at 10x the usual rate! Combine this with the incredibly high risks involved in such a massive long-term investment, and most reactors operate on a "strike price" principle: they negotiate a fixed electricity rate with the government, and the government has to pay (or gets to keep) the difference between the market rate and the strike price. More importantly, this applies to all the electricity the reactor could sell: if the reactor is able to generate power but the grid operator for one reason or another wants to source it somewhere else, the reactor operator still gets paid. All this means nuclear reactors can only really be used to supply base load. In an ideal world we'd want to use them as peaker plants to make up for deficiencies left by solar and wind, but in practice we'll be turning off wind farms to let nuclear reactors run. Nuclear power might've made sense a couple of decades ago, but there just isn't a place for them left in a modern renewable-heavy grid.
  - jacquesm 1y ago
    As long as you stay under 5%/minute or so, yes, you can with the latest generation of nuclear plants. Above that there are other alternatives that are more suitable (pumped storage, natural gas fired turbines). And indeed, what you describe is exactly how it goes, nuclear power pretty much dictates the price of energy because it is the most expensive form. This is the big controversy of market based energy pricing to me. It should be the cheapest energy source that determines the price, not one of the most expensive ones.
    - orwin 1y ago
      I don't think nuclear ever dictated SPOT electricity prices in Europe. Gas, pulsed coal, or Steps do though.
      - jacquesm 1y ago
        I've recently looked into this in some detail and the situation is actually a lot more complex than you might think looking from the outside in. This is an interesting article on how energy markets arrive at their price (it is incomplete, and a bit dated, but still useful): https://neon.energy/Blume-Werry-Faber-Hirth-Huber-Everts-2021-Eye-on-the-price.pdf https://neon.energy/Blume-Werry-Faber-Hirth-Huber-Everts-202...
brightball 1y ago
I apparently made a bad assumption. I thought I remembered reading that nuclear plants were looking to shut down due to economics of electricity not being profitable for them anymore, which I assumed meant lack of demand. I also remembered seeing several articles about a crypto mining operation doing exactly that. - https://ignition-news.com/talen-energy-buys-out-a-nuclear-powered-crypto-mine/ https://ignition-news.com/talen-energy-buys-out-a-nuclear-po... - https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10052025/new-york-bitcoin-mines-buying-up-power-plants/ https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10052025/new-york-bitcoin... - https://www.power-eng.com/nuclear/nuclear-powered-bitcoin-mining-operations-ramp-up-in-pennsylvania/ https://www.power-eng.com/nuclear/nuclear-powered-bitcoin-mi... - https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/12/texas-power-plant-expansion-granbury-bitcoin-mine-pollution/ https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/12/texas-power-plant-ex... That last one is actually just a natural gas plant though.
namibj 1y ago
They don't need to for the location to be reasonable; you can use the grid connection with reverse power flow to feed the data center just fine. Leave enough to feed the coolant pumps in an outage though.

jacquesm 1y ago

Because (1) they are at or near capacity, (2) they are very costly to operate so those 'reasonable rates' are very hard to come by when using nuclear as power source. There are other, cheaper sources for power than nuclear that are more in line with what data center operators are willing to pay. There has been some talk of data centers with their own power plants. But usually that centers on fossil fuels rather than on nuclear. There are some efforts in that direction though: https://neutronbytes.com/2025/05/07/google-plans-three-600-mw-nuclear-projects-for-data-centers/ https://neutronbytes.com/2025/05/07/google-plans-three-600-m... And I'm aware of a much smaller scale project in Europe besides this one and there are probably others.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]