3 ms·
>Yes, it's bad. Because we're all dying of cancer, heart disease and auto-immune disease, not to mention traffic accidents and other random killers that AI coul
by aeve890 1y ago
>Yes, it's bad. Because we're all dying of cancer, heart disease and auto-immune disease, not to mention traffic accidents and other random killers that AI could warn us about and fix.
Any disease cured/death avoided by AI yet?
- monocasa 1y agoThere's rumors that ML played a part in the creation of the covid mRNA vaccines.
- unsupp0rted 1y agoPossibly psoriasis, as a canary test case https://www.abcellera.com https://www.abcellera.com
- calmoo 1y agoIs this really a useful argument? There is clearly potential for AI to solve a lot of important issues. Anybody saying "and has this cured x y or z?" before a huge discovery was made after years of research isn't a good argument to stop research.
- aeve890 1y agoIt is in the face of naive, overoptimistic arguments that straight up ignore the negative impacts, that IMO vastly outweigh the positive ones. We will have the cure of cancer, but everyone loses their jobs. This happened before, with nuclear energy. The utopia of clean, too cheap to meter nuclear energy never came, though we have enough nukes to glass the planet ten times over. Stop pretending that the people behind this technology is genuinely motivated by what's best for humanity.