aeve890

4 ms·

1.
by aeve890 5d ago
Doesn't matter. At the current RPI prices is just better to buy a mini PC or any of the alternative SBC like the orange pi.
2.
by aeve890 6d ago
>A few people with way to much power are building AI to achieve their utopian, sci-fi dream. You mean dystopian. If it were a utopia everyone would be happy to welcome the new world order.
3.
by aeve890 8d ago
>Physics conjecture >Looks inside. >Zero math. Zero effort slop.
4.
by aeve890 8d ago
>Actual physics isn't done in blog posts Wolfram didn't get the memo
5.
by aeve890 8d ago
The same trick is used in f(R) theories, where the Ricci scalar in General Relativity is replaced with a linear function. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F(R)_gravity Reminds me of TRIZ methods too, trying to find assump
6.
by aeve890 9d ago
Americans behaving the way they are now and Parisians mixed together? Hell on Earth
7.
by aeve890 11d ago
>darios being like courics, but for vibeslop instead of turds What's the conversion between diarios and samas? Are the same at -40?
8.
by aeve890 11d ago
>Apply the same question to music, or drawing Why asking outside the technical domain? Code is instructions for a machine for it to do a task. All this philosophy around code as art or whatever it's in my opinion just intellectual o
9.
by aeve890 11d ago
>All the world is a stage Not really. Most of the cold war nuclear war scenarios only consider nuclear exchange in the northern hemisphere. Until this day there's little strategic value in south America or south Africa. Maybe Austra
10.
by aeve890 14d ago
>Hi LG Fuck that. Dystopian shit with people yelling brand names in their homes. Edit: I forgot people already be yelling Alexa/Siri/Google. I can't imagine a future when you have to yell to each brand in your home. "
11.
by aeve890 14d ago
>without comprehending Very on brand with using AI for everything.
12.
by aeve890 14d ago
>Anyone Strangely enough, the crackpots seems to prefer vixra.org to publish their work. I've never seen something like "4D wormholes can cure cancer" in ArXiv
13.
by aeve890 16d ago
If you think mathematicians do this kind of research just for the chance to win a million dollar prize, please gtfo
14.
by aeve890 17d ago
>They did do this, but it seems that Navier-Stokes is the only one that was successful How convenient that they could solve the only problem where researchers have done most of the legwork already. What a coincidence. And the timing, per
15.
by aeve890 18d ago
Do you even know what a proof entails? This shit is not a proof, come on.
16.
by aeve890 18d ago
MS had VBS. Just sayin
17.
by aeve890 18d ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If OP claim superhuman genius, then they should prove superhuman genius. Simple as that.
18.
by aeve890 18d ago
Parent comment is claiming creativity and genius beyond human experts, so why not ask for a fully unassisted AI novel result? Having access to the entire corpus of human knowledge, what else such amazing entity would require to solve a hard
19.
by aeve890 18d ago
>If anyone has counterpoints to this I'd love to hear them! Sure. A proof without an unknown amount of human steering (and/or stolen research) would be an unquestionable achievement. To this day there's zero (0) evidence o
20.
by aeve890 18d ago
Wait, people now want AGI to be sentient too?
21.
by aeve890 18d ago
Severance S2 was a clusterfuck tho. Absolute nonsense.
22.
by aeve890 18d ago
Remove the word "cures" and the title makes perfect sense.
23.
by aeve890 19d ago
Would you value a gift made by someone you know but through a bot? Without the person even knowing what happened, and for them it's nothing more than a charge on their credit card? Sending flowers is not a soulless act, but automating
24.
by aeve890 19d ago
Is this satire? Some feedback: bury this souless shit and be a real person and send flowers to your mom yourself. Jfc what's happening? I was under the impression that "retardmaxxing" was just a stupid meme, not something peo
25.
by aeve890 19d ago
Bobby-Sunny=Billy it's an embeddings things, you know
26.
by aeve890 20d ago
Lmao even. Interstellar in <30 years? come on.
27.
by aeve890 22d ago
Your point being? llms are software running in a fixed pipeline (barring variance induced by randomness in some layers). There's nothing like decoherence/thermal effects in a "lower level" that could induce stochastic b
28.
by aeve890 22d ago
>I don’t understand how it can know that a token is correct. It can't. The next token is just the most statistically probably given the context (at least in transformers). Try a very small/weak model in your own machine and mor
29.
by aeve890 23d ago
>That is a completely unsupportable claim >For all we know they might already be Oh the irony
30.
by aeve890 23d ago
>The possibility is the Mars where there is a big scar on it, where it could have had been a space war, but cannot figure out as it's been billions of years ago. A Death Star ray just grazed Mars and ended up hitting Earth and killi

More ›