7 ms·
Teacher AI use is already out of control and it's not ok
- hanspeter 1y agoIs there more to it, or are we calling the situation out of control based on a single anecdote from Reddit?
- EdwardDiego 1y agoYou need to read more of the source blog - he's been pretty pro LLM, but is now acknowledging where it's going too far.
- hanspeter 1y agoI'm not new to simonw. It doesn't change that this is just a quote from a reddit post and a link to it.
- NoPicklez 1y agoFairy low quality post this one
- EdwardDiego 1y agoYou need to read more of the source blog - he's been pretty pro LLM, but is now acknowledging where it's going too far.
- DougBTX 1y agoAgreed, this is just a quote on his link blog. Better to post Reddit thread directly. I wouldn’t expect a plain Reddit link to get to the HN front page though.
- EdwardDiego 1y agoInteresting, Simon Williamson has been rather engaged with and positive about LLM usage, so it's good to see some nuance developing.
- sieste 1y agoTeacher saved himself some time by using a chatbot to make a slideshow presentation for a staff meeting. Good! Teachers use chatbots for everything else, uncritically. Not good!
- SpaceNoodled 1y agoIf you can't be bothered to assemble information to present, why should I bother to waste my time staring at a pile of slop?
- Meekro 1y agoIf I had a choice about whether to give the presentation, I would choose not to. If you had a choice about whether to attend it, you would also choose not to. But, alas, both of us are there -- such is the way of the large bureaucracy.
- exe34 1y agoI do have a choice to zone out and think of England.
- crinkly 1y agoI think the real problems are that knowing when to use something appropriately and holding yourself honestly to that are pretty difficult for most people.
- exe34 1y agoNo, if you can type in a prompt, just email me the prompt so I know what you intended. I don't need the slop the AI came up with, thank you. I already feel disrespected in powerpoint presentations where they clearly haven't practiced it for a long time and seem to be discovering the slides and coming up with the argument they want to make on the spot. I usually get up and leave.
- halgir 1y agoThere is a middle ground between artisanal powerpoint craftsmanship and AI slop.
- politelemon 1y agoI suggest please link directly to the reddit thread, it has the original text (not a snippet) and lots of additional insights and anecdotes in the comments. https://np.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1mhntjh/unpopular_opinion_teacher_ai_use_is_already_out/ https://np.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1mhntjh/unpopular_...
- bdisl 1y ago[flagged]
- torium 1y agoOn HN, reddit counts as a negative signal. You link to reddit directly and most HNers will instantly downvote. I keep telling people here that reddit is actually an underappreciated goldmine, but I guess feeling better than others feels too good to pass on. In my mind, reddit is like of HN, except instead of being just tech and business oriented people, it's every subject under the sun. Most of it is garbage (like on HN) but if you're willing to search it's a goldmine.
- rglullis 1y agoReddit was a goldmine until they decided to put a toll booth on its main entry points.
- os2warpman 1y agoEvery time someone criticizes reddit I automatically assume that they have brain damage. When I go to reddit, I see posts about astrophotography, vintage computers, ham radio, classic cars, typewriters, film photography, sculpture, gardening, woodworking, firefighting, archery, fencing, outer space, watches, cutaway drawings, the Sega Saturn, and more topics I'm interested in. When they go to reddit they see stuff they don't like, and people arguing about it. I just want to shout "yes, you do, because your brain is damaged and you asked it to show those things to you". It's the same with all social media. When I go to instagram I see people I know personally and have been in the same room with doing things I am interested in. I don't see any rage, titillation, celebrities, or gossip. Just my friends and acquaintances being friendly. (It IS annoying that I keep having to turn off suggested posts) Even when I click on the magnifying glass, which is where people say Instagram shows them titillating things in order to get them hooked, I see scuba diving, aviation, vintage Macs, watches, and astronomy. What is going on? Do I have a "only show this guy nice stuff he's interested in" cookie following me around the internet? And YouTube. People will complain about YouTube showing them shit. When I go to YouTube.com, right now, I just opened it in another tab, the top six videos are: Dutch firefighters battling a stable fire, a homelabber messing around with vintage linksys equipment, a history of the development of nuclear weapons, a review of a handheld video game emulator, a guy with a VAX setup in his basement working on restoring those machines, and a video on new theories about how the moon was formed. The next six are also laser-focused on my interests including a two hour video about various motifs found in Indo-European mythology and their origins which I am totally going to listen to in the background while at work. I did nothing, NOTHING, except subscribe to/follow things I like and people I know, and it's great. When people log into reddit and see people arguing about bullshit, instagram and see models bouncing their tits, and YouTube and see garbage, the only logical conclusion I can reach is that their brains are damaged and they set up the systems to show them these things then decided to complain about it as some kind of hobby or something. If anything, HN is the worst of them all because I can't tell it "show me more 'floppy disk raid array' and less 'crypto and AI bullshit'".
- fzeroracer 1y agoTeachers using AI to generate all of their lesson material, read student papers and write comments. Students using AI to generate their papers and solve complex problems. What are we as humans even doing. Why not just connect two shitty models together and tell them to hallucinate to each other and skip the whole need to think about anything. We can fire both teachers and students at the same time and save money on this whole education thing.
- bdisl 1y ago>What are we as humans even doing. We are avoiding work that we don't want to do and therefore saving time, which is precisely what technology promised would help us do.
- prmoustache 1y ago> and therefore saving time Apparently we aren't.
- woodpanel 1y agoAgree. Somehow though, this actually might be the best time to for learners, to sit down and engage with topics and don’t be distracted by formal stuff (degrees, grades, points) because the latter is becoming more meaningless with each token being sent down the drain.
- avidiax 1y ago> Why not just connect two shitty models together and tell them to hallucinate to each other and skip the whole need to think about anything. Western countries have better conditions than much of the world for a variety of reasons, but among them is education and culture. Raising the next generation to outsource all thinking to AI and form a culture around influencing people 45 seconds at a time will destroy those prerequisites to our better lifestyle, and it will be downhill from there. You might argue that the AI can be a mentor or can guide society appropriately. That's not wholly untrue, but if AI is "a bicycle for the mind", you still have to have the willingness and vision to go someplace with it. If you've never thought for yourself, never learned anything independently, I just don't see how people will avoid using AI to be "stupid faster".
- internet_points 1y ago> * A teacher sponsoring a club put student artwork through Microsoft Copilot to 'clean it up' because he thought it looked too unfinished and the kid felt incredibly disrespected and upset. and rightly so! kids deserve better, that is awful
- chii 1y agohowever, this same action could be useful if it was placed in a different context - for example, if the teacher uses the same AI to produce an artefact, then use it to critique the student as part of teaching (say, to show what might be lacking in a particular piece).
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- jfarmer 1y agoI sometimes find Paul Watzlawick's five axioms of communication helping in thinking about situations like this. Link: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watzlawick#Five_basic_axioms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watzlawick#Five_basic_axi...) 1. One cannot not communicate 2. Every communication has a content and relationship aspect such that the latter classifies the former and is therefore a metacommunication 3. The nature of a relationship is dependent on the punctuation of the partners' communication procedures 4. Human communication involves both digital and analog modalities 5. Inter-human communication procedures are either symmetric or complementary Re: (1), the "mere" act of using AI communicates something, just like some folks might register a text message as more (or less) intimate than a phone call, email, etc. The choice of modality is always part of what's communicated, part of the act of communication, and we can't stop that. Re: (2), that communication is then classified by each person's idea of what the relationship is. This is a dramatic and expensive way to learn they had different ideas of their relationship! Of course, in a teacher/student situation, it's the teacher's job to make it clear to the students what the relationship is. Otherwise you risk relationship-damaging "surprises" like this. Even ignoring the normative question of what a teacher Should™ do in that situation, it was counterproductive. Whatever benefit the teacher thought AI would provide, they'd (hopefully) agree it was outweighed by the cost to their relationship w/ students. All future interactions w/ those students will now be X% harder. There's a kind of technical rationale which says that if (1) the GOAL is to improve the student's output and (2) I would normally do that by giving one or more rounds of feedback and waiting for the student to incorporate it then (3) I should use AI because it will help us reach that goal faster and more efficiently. John Dewey described this rationale in Human Nature and Conduct as thinking that "Because a thirsty man gets satisfaction in drinking water, bliss consists in being drowned." He concludes: ”It is forgotten that success is success of a specific effort, and satisfaction the fulfillment of a specific demand, so that success and satisfaction become meaningless when severed from the wants and struggles whose consummations they are, or when taken universally.” The act of receiving and incorporating feedback is not "inefficient", especially not in a school setting. The consummation of that process is part of the goal. Maybe the most important part! Full Dewey quote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44597741 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44597741
- crinkly 1y agoSo my daughter got sent home with some math questions. Thought they looked a bit dry but thought nothing further of it. I checked the answers for her which were all ok. Couple of days later she comes home and tells me I was wrong about some of them which I know I was not. Apparently they self marked them as the teacher read the answers out. Decided to phone in and ask about the marking scheme which I was told I was wrong too and basically I should have done better at GCSE mathematics. I relayed my mathematical credentials and immediately the tone changed. The discussion indicated that they’d generated the questions with CoPilot and then fed that back into CoPilot and generated the answer sheet which had two incorrect answers on it. The teacher and department head in question defended their position until I threatened to feed them to the examination board and leadership team. The following of the tech was almost zealot level religious thinking which is not something I want to see in education. I check all homework now carefully and there have been other issues since.
- Avicebron 1y agoGreat, and now you too are bagging your own groceries, mission accomplished.
- DavidPiper 1y agoIt seems a little disingenuous to equate the importance of bagging groceries and supporting your child's education when judging how much time and attention each deserves.
- zamadatix 1y agoI think the meaning was more "and now there is yet another thing the education system was better suited to do the parent now needs to do instead" and less "your child's education is worth grocery bags".
- DavidPiper 1y agoOh! Yes that's a completely different read, and one whose sentiment I very much agree with.
- janalsncm 1y agoWonder if this is a natural consequence of teachers being overworked. If teachers can get more work done with AI (who cares if quality suffers!) then that becomes the baseline and admins will push them to do even more. In other words I predict this to be less of an issue with smaller class sizes.
- sooheon 1y agoOverworked is relative. As soon as a way to reduce current workload is available, everyone feels "overworked"
- tecleandor 1y agoIn some fields it's becoming a bit ridiculous/worrying. The work load is making people create or extend their work using LLMs, and the reviewers/managers are also overloaded and don't have enough time to go through it so they feed it to an LLM to get a summary, that later is pushed somewhere else to feed another process... becoming a "broken telephone" business process were nobody really knows the detail of what's going on, and it's just LLMs feeding another LLMs in an eternally absurd process.
- bri3k 1y agoAre they overworked? In the article he states he is coaching and run three preps in addition to teaching. Less can be more.
- Vinnl 1y ago
- globular-toast 1y agoTrains allowed us to go further than we could ever walk. Cars caused us to lose the ability to walk completely. Looms allowed us to produce fabrics of higher quality than we ever could by hand. Fast fashion caused us to lose the ability to care for and mend clothes completely. Computers allowed us to calculate and "think" faster than we ever could before. AI caused us to lose the ability to think completely...
- password321 1y agoRichard Feynman summed up public education well even if schools have ostensibly changed since: "Everything was written by somebody who didn’t know what the hell he was talking about, so it was a little bit wrong, always!". Now they just have an extra tool to help them.
- kaffekaka 1y agoI absolutely cannot read a Feynman quote without literally hearing it in his voice. Things being a little bit wrong is not a huge problem. Much worse is if LLMs remove all the rigor and grit from education, the hard work to learn how to recognize facts.
- meindnoch 1y agoIn the future, only prestigious private schools will employ human teachers. Education in public schools is going to be 100% LLMs with text-to-speech, the only human adult in classrooms will be a security guard, but later they will also be replaced with AI-controlled autocannons that shoot non-lethal projectiles to discipline misbehaving kids.
- SJC_Hacker 1y agoHave you ever been inside an American K-12 classroom ? Education is secondary to a teachers job …. the real issue is managing the classroom without disruption
- polskibus 1y agoWhy do you think it’s different in other countries? It’s the same all over Europe too. More and more kids have ADHD or other mental issues, social networking affects social norms etc.
- Lord-Jobo 1y agoIt's culture. American culture treats teaching and education like a free babysitting service, and pays teachers accordingly. If our culture valued education we would value teachers and their ability to teach, and we so clearly do not.
- polskibus 1y agoI assure you, it’s similar in many EU countries. Teachers are usually paid very little, governments are not doing much to keep them, due to really bad demographics forecasts in most countries.
- SJC_Hacker 1y agoI don't know about other countries, my experience has only been in US high schools, mostly public. Maybe it would work in other countries, or private schools
- karel-3d 1y agoStudents give AI-generated essays and the AI then grade it. That's what's called GAN - generative adversarial network.
- exegete 1y agoAnd teachers used AI to generate the essay question.
- karel-3d 1y agoUnsupervised learning.
- spacecadet 1y agoLOL
- jjani 1y agoAll those teachers should indeed be banned from using AI. But that's not because LLMs are incapable of the things they're using them for, in a way that would be an improvement over how those same teachers were doing those tasks pre-LLMs. The majority of times I see things like this it turns out that it's either: - The "they've built it wrong" case; this one is the most common. People using - or in this case being made to use at work - tools that behind the scenes all use very cheap models (e.g. 4o-mini) with little context, half vibe-coded up, to save costs. The company making "MagicSchool" doesn't care, they want to maximize those profit margins and they're selling to school administration, not teachers, who only look at the costs and don't ever actually use the products themselves. Just like classic enterprise software in traditional companies. They need to tick boxes, show features that only show the happy path/case. It is perfectly possible to make it high quality, in a way that adds value, doesn't make shit up, and is properly validated. But especially in this niche, sales trumps everything. The hope is that at some point, this will change. We've seen the same play out with enterprise software to an extent; new such software does tend to be more usable on average than it used to be. It has taken a long time to get there though. - The "you're holding it wrong" meme; users themselves directly using tools like Microsoft Copilot, 4o and friends (very outdated, free tiers, miles behind Claude/Gemini 2.5 pro/o3/etc.), along with having zero idea about what LLMs can and can't do, and obviously even less of an idea about inherent biases and prompting to prevent those. This combined with a complete lack of caring, along with a lack of competency - people lacking the basic critical thinking skills necessary to spot issues - is a deadly combo. Of the problems with tasks and outcomes named in that thread, the large majority can indeed be done already with LLMs in a manner that both saves time and provides better quality than the level of those teachers rightly being criticized there. Teachers who are not even checking the output obviously don't give a single damn anyway, and that tells you enough about what the quality of their teaching would've been like pre-LLMs.
- tovej 1y agoUsing LLMs to produce material is not a good idea, except maybe to polish up grammar and phrasing. As a former teacher, I know you need to have a good grasp of the material you are using in order to help students understand it. The material should also be in a similarly structured form thoughout a course, which will reinforce the expectations of the students, making their mental load lesser. The only way to do this is to prepare the material yourself. Material created by LLM will have the issues you mentioned, yes, but it will also be less easy to teach, for the reasons mentioned above. In the US, where teaching is already in a terrible state, I wouldn't be surprised if this is accepted quietly, but it will have a long lasting negative impact on learning outcomes. If we project this forward, a reliance on AI tools might also create a lower expectation of the quality of the material, which will drag the rest of the material down as well. This mirrors the rise of expendable mass produced products when we moved the knowledge needed to produce goods from workers to factory machines. Commodities are one thing, you could argue that the decrease in quality is offset by volume (I wouldn't, but you could), but for teaching? Not a good idea. At most, let the students know how to use LLMs to look for information, and warn them of hallucinations and not being able to find the sources.
- matusp 1y agoThe cracks in the education system were showing even before AI, with unmotivated students and teachers alike just burning their hours. AI just exposed these cracks and showed that the entire system is incredibly inefficient and pointless. I believe that the future of education is in much smaller institutions that can support their communities on a human scale.
- probably_wrong 1y agoI don't think inefficiency is the right word. In fact, I'd argue the exact opposite: that one of the main problems with education is that every single administrator has been trying to optimize it to death for the wrong metrics, namely "number of students making it through" and "budget". Smaller institutions are indeed better, but they are also less efficient. It's no wonder that only rich families can afford institutions like that.
- spacecadet 1y agoI agree with you. Learning is messy, hyper situational, and personalized. "Optimizing" for "efficiency" neglects this and resulted in the cookie cutter "teacher factories" that public education has become. As someone with relatives who were public school teachers- they will tell you that there is no way to scale it back and bring the community aspect in closer... that most communities have too little budget and too many children and it just burns through teachers... Like gun control, this is likely a problem that will continue "without solution" because people are lazy and change is difficult. Im sure future historians will credit some of Americas collapse to this problem, among other "unfixable" societal problems.
- obscurette 1y agoAs a teacher – excellent description, thank you. Just to add my experience to it – I was in school in seventies and had "40 years since graduating" meeting some years ago with my classmates. Vast majority were doing well and while we talked about old times in school, two things stood out. At first while we were in the same class, our experience was very different. We remembered very different things, different teachers were important to us up to the point where some of them were most loved ones to some, but most hated ones to others etc. But we all agreed that our homes were even more important for our education than school – from our homes (parents and grandparents) came the attitude that education is important and no matter what, it's our responsibility to study.
- looseyesterday 1y agoIn some cases teachers are being overworked and expected to deliver far beyond their capability. The issue I see here is that its Powerpoint / document generation AI tools often use older / cheaper / worse models e.g. 4o mini, instead of Claude opus or Gemini 2.5 pro. The second issue it is often hard for the original prompter to see issues in AI output, so another pair of eyes or a different LLM prompt with more context can often pick up most issues. I dont think AI use for teachers is going anywhere, we should work with the flow on this one and help teachers do their jobs more easily.
- bigbacaloa 1y ago[dead]
- bigbacaloa 1y ago[dead]
- 5pl1n73r 1y agoThis is happening across all industries, unfortunately. Medical, engineering, pharmaceuticals, law enforcement, military, transportation, law... Thanks for a perfect post that describes the problem! We need more of these. Most people know they're doing it too, they just need to be told more.
- minraws 1y agoSo you mean to say now good prompt engineering can get me good grades... Well I guess as long as you have an idea which model your teacher uses you are golden.
- ozgung 1y agoThese examples show that we have a serious social issue, and it's not limited to teachers. People misuse LLMs. We engineers understand that LLMs are products under development. They only work correctly under certain circumstances, and they have limitations and non-perfect evaluation metrics. Regular people (non-engineers) treat them as finished products or magic wands. They ignore the warnings in the page saying LLM can make mistakes. And there are billions of those people. This may create huge social problems that engineers can't fix.
- georgeplusplus 1y agoNormal product release cycles bring testable quality measures before the product is released. Do LLMs go through such tests? If there are serious societal issues that it can cause at the moment I wonder why it was released before being perfected, but then, what does perfected even look like? The product is darn good at the moment.
- ozgung 1y agoThese products are basically public beta. Some features are even experimental. They are released to the public because (1) companies have to gain early market share (2) they need actual user data. Sam Altman firing drama from last year was related to this issue.
- watwut 1y ago> We engineers understand that LLMs are products under development. They only work correctly under certain circumstances Looking around me, engineers do not understand that. Instead, they have exactly same overblown expectations and actively push for LLM everywhere. They will call you ludite if you say anything else.
- ACCount36 1y ago[flagged]
- ozgung 1y agoThat's also because of seeing them as technology under development. The overblown expectations are because of their potential in the future. The glass is half full today. It was almost empty just a few years ago. The water level is rising with an unprecedented rate. But we shouldn't forget it's still half empty right now. More importantly, we are bad at predicting how actual people use the technology.
- conartist6 1y agoOften the LLM people read like they're five years old, discovering for the very first time what happens when you start to act out against society and root your moral calculus in deep cynicism
- xrd 1y agoIt feels funny to think about this next to the outrage over trans kids in school sports. There are probably a dozen kids nationally participating in a sport with other kids who didn't share the same set of chromosomes at birth. That's a tiny slice of the population, but the issue has captured the attention of a huge group of people. I believe the anger, if you distill it a bit, comes from an "unlevel" playing field, right? But, when students use AI, and if there are some students that don't, the playing field is "unlevel" there as well. The students that don't perhaps want to learn a craft rather than take a shortcut to getting a grade. I would wager that the number of students and teachers using AI is now the majority population. I face this dilemma on a daily basis when trying to do my job as a software developer. Let claude take over, and risk losing the only skill I had to differentiate myself in this harsh world? Or, take a chance on being the turtle and trying to win the race against the hare?
- skeezyboy 1y ago> Let claude take over, and risk losing the only skill I had to differentiate myself in this harsh world? the good times are over, it happens. i remember watching that Dall-E come out and feeling sorry for graphic designers, gloating in the knowledge programming was too complex to automate. then they automated it. a human is still required in the loop for vibe coding, as its fairly fuckin useless without guidance, but i can see that changing too
- simonw 1y agoThe more time I spend writing code with help from LLMs the less I fear for my job, because I gain an increased understanding of how much depth there is to building software. To get good results out of an LLM you need to determine exactly what the system needs to do and how it should work. That's programming! We just don't have to type all the semicolons ourselves any more.
- xrd 1y agoI always feel pretty special when you respond to a comment of mine. Thank you. I agree with you. And, I'm not sure LLMs help me learn high level concepts (yet). They certainly have those concepts inside their training data and you can extract the concepts if you do the work. But, in a lot of domains, and this applies to someone old like me and someome young like my kids, knowing what to ask is the central problem. This applies to what I see my kids doing with AI: I don't think LLMs, right now, encourage them to learn concepts as much as they quickly give them answers. I don't see ChatGPT Study Mode as fulfilling on this, in my limited usage, but I would love to be wrong about that. Its a good direction indeed. Probably this is the new frontier, where the best students are the ones that figure out how to use these tools to learn "deeply" rather than just jumping to the answers. Maybe that is how it has always been?
- Invictus0 1y agoPeople need to realize that the next generation of kids is already unable to differentiate human vs llm generated text, and not only that, but they don't even mind it. They are already using LLMs to generate all their text and so they don't mind reading LLM generated text either.
- mannykannot 1y agoThe next generation? Our generation is already there, apparently.
- taway1a2b3c 1y agoThey won't be reading the text, they will be getting their LLMs to summarize the LLM generated text and read it to them. We are heading for a state where all written communication will be mediated by LLMs - get my people to talk to your people but for everyone.
- iaiuse 1y agoLLMs will mediate plenty of routine text, but the choke-point shifts from “writing” to “prompting + validating”. In client projects we see two hard costs pop up: 1. Human review time ⟶ still 2–4 min per 1 k tokens because hallucination isn’t solved. 2. Inference \$: for a 70 B model at 16 k context you pay ~\$0.12 per 1 k tokens — cheap for generation, expensive for bulk reading. So yes, AI will read for us, but whoever owns the *attention budget + validation loop* still controls comprehension. That’s where new leverage lives.
- blibble 1y agofirst order effect of AI: the individual saves time second order effect: across the entire population, the incentive to learn anything at all is removed third order effect: society ceases to improve and regresses but it's all good as I can generate boilerplate 30% faster!
- jv22222 1y agoFYI This school uses AI as teachers: https://alpha.school/santa-barbara/ https://alpha.school/santa-barbara/ They say they have good results?
- simonw 1y agoGiven that "Alpha School tuition ranges from $40,000 upwards" I wouldn't expect them to not say they get good results!
- Balgair 1y agohttps://www.astralcodexten.com/p/your-review-alpha-school https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/your-review-alpha-school Here's a review of AlphaSchool and it's methods. Honestly, the review is a good one and very well written. It's worth your time if you have inkling about alternative education and the use of AI in the classroom. TLDR: The magic is not AI, it's that they bribe kids for good grades. Oops, sorry, 'motivate' kids for good grades.
- Myrmornis 1y agoWe need to pay teachers more if we're to effectively have this conversation.
- xnx 1y agoConsidering that an auto-generated storybook (https://gemini.google.com/share/8d296b91b77b https://gemini.google.com/share/8d296b91b77b) taught me why 0.99999... = 1 more clearly and memorably than my "good school district" education, I'm optimistic what AI could do for education.
- simianwords 1y agoHot take: ChatGPT’s performance is close enough to a teacher’s which is why this is a problem at all. Can some one answer what would realistically change if teachers did use ChatGPT in this way but the students never found out? Things would be more or less the same.
- j_timberlake 1y agoAI just reveals how lazy/cheap/low-standards they were already trying to be. And if AI keeps progressing at current speeds, those are the people who are going to be most easily replaced by AI-tutors within a few years. The actually-good teachers would still have a job in a sane world, but who knows what will happen.
- readthenotes1 1y agoThe good news is that teaching via PowerPoint slides is probably one of the worst possible ways and so just making it repetitive won't disturb the students naps too much. If the teacher had asked AI what are more effective ways to ensure the students are learning the material, I really doubt a PowerPoint presentation would have been the result
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]