8 ms·
[flagged]
by SchemaLoad 1y ago
[flagged]
- ThatMedicIsASpy 1y agoDoubt with the whole tech stack. Germany is using a lot more Palantir in the police. I'd love to see change.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- FirmwareBurner 1y agoGermany produces not much valuable SW yet their police surveillance state has no issues making use of foreign developed spyware tech (Palantir, Pegasus) against its citizens if they say the wrong things or are not part of the political establishment. Do you still get threatening letters with fines at home when you download a pirated movie?
- ThatMedicIsASpy 1y agoI have been pirating on and off for almost 25 years. This wasn't a problem in my early years so I learned and know all the sides of it. I would have definitely got those in my early days. But the whole thing started way later and they should still be around.
- jordanb 1y ago[flagged]
- ben_w 1y agoThat a Ukraine loss is seen as the end of a free Europe (because Russia wouldn't stop at least until at least DDR Germany borders), is why the other European nations are collectively increasing military spending. For a sense of scale (only scale, money is definitely not the most important criteria), the EU currently spends twice as much on their military as Russia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest_military_expenditures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest... So if (when) American support disappears, I expect Russia to continue to not go anywhere fast while wasting a lot of lives in the process. I also expect this to surprise Putin, as he thinks Russia is a Great Power and therefore can only be stalling if Ukraine is supported by another Great Power and doesn't recognise that (1) Russia isn't, and (2) the EU kinda is, sort of, when it feels like acting with unity rather than as 27 different nations.
- 4gotunameagain 1y agoIt makes no sense whatsoever for Russia to attack more states than Ukraine. The sole reason Russia invaded Ukraine was that it was flirting too much with NATO. Putin might be a lunatic, but he is not stupid.
- shafyy 1y agoIt also made "no sense" for Russia to attack Ukraine. This is not about rational thinking.
- 4gotunameagain 1y agoIf we are to be completely rational, what made no sense was Ukraine thinking it could be a part of NATO, or independent. It is the sad reality of existing next to a superpower. You cannot be independent. It would either be heavily influenced by Russia, or the option B they chose: in rubble.
- ben_w 1y agoRussia stopped being a superpower with the fall of the USSR. And before anyone says so, "has a permanent seat on UN security council" doesn't count, the UK and France also have that status and even combined were no longer superpowers by the time of the Suez crisis. Likewise "has nukes" is not sufficient. The EU is closer to being one than Russia is today, and even then the EU is only kinda a bit of one in some measures but not all.
- SirMaster 1y agoWhy does every source I can find list Russia as a superpower?
- ben_w 1y agoTo hazard a guess: because Google et al think you're the kind of person who clicks that kind of source. When I search for list of superpowers, I get superheroes — obviously nobody on Marvel or DC is going to be listed as having "Russia" as their superpower, but this does illustrate what it is that search engines do these days, and it's not objective truth.
- nandomrumber 1y ago[flagged]
- aredox 1y agoThat's until you get disabled in an accident - or your son or daughter is. Then you'll suddenly convert to how benefits are essential. (In before: "I don't need a car insurance, I'll never get into any accident, I am too good a driver for that")
- nandomrumber 1y ago[flagged]
- mschuster91 1y ago> The number of elderly Australians who live alone with no family, or no family nearby, is truely disappointing. That's a thing across all Western societies, and we got unchecked rabid capitalism and a complete lack of industry structural politics to thank for that one. Young people not living in an urban area have little choice but to leave there to find employment and higher level education.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- aredox 1y agoWho is "we"? The big welfare state was born in the post-war boom, a period of big, strong families that believed in the future. The dismantling of the Family and of the Welfare State, and of Unions, and of any kind of support and collaboration between salaried people go hand-in-hand. Late stage capitalism needs to extract everything from everyone, without opposition. Having people desperate for a job at any cost because they don't a a support network is the ideal state for our managers and bosses. Welcome to the anti-neoliberalism camp :)
- zbentley 1y ago
- csomar 1y agoYou being down-voted is more testament to the orientation of thinking clouding judgment here in HN. Ukraine losing the war will be a massive blow for Europe. Sibling commentator mentioned doubling of the military budget but this disregard readiness of engagement and unity[1]. Nato was the creation of the US and the US pulling out requires, probably, another entity with committed members. 1: https://www.politico.eu/article/italy-grand-plan-meet-nato-target-13-5b-bridge-sicily-donlad-trump-silvio-berlusconi-messina/ https://www.politico.eu/article/italy-grand-plan-meet-nato-t...
- Barrin92 1y ago>Ukraine losing the war will be a massive blow for Europe There is no such thing. Even if Ukraine cannot recapture all of the lost territory, it's Russia who has already lost. That a country four times the population, ten times as rich has incurred a million casualties, switched to a war economy, has to throw tens of thousand of North Koreans into a war in Europe, merely to creep forward by a few meters has to be the largest humiliation to an alleged "great power" in a century. All of this while Europe has not even remilitarized, with Ukraine becoming a major producer of military technology in its own right, the country is now largely self sufficient in terms of its drone output among other things, is one of the strongest signs of resilience of this continent.
- jajko 1y ago[flagged]
- asimovfan 1y agocan you please talk more about the socialism that is prevalent in the EU? what do you exactly mean by "hard focus on socialism"?
- mschuster91 1y ago> US has trump and I see no end of US anytime soon, sure some self-harm is happening right now but thats about it, that nation is stronger than that. That remains to be seen. Trump and his goons are breaking apart the foundations of society as we speak, not to mention the decades of Republican gerrymandering. The complete and utter loss of trust in the US on the geopolitical stage is another huge issue, it will be a long time before Europe or Southern America trust the US again - the hope that Trump would be a short-term one-off event went out the window last year. > Compared to hard focus on socialism that was (and still is) prevalent in EU, some better balance is required in these times. Where outside of Spain does Europe actually have socialists even as part of the government? Most countries here are run by the far-right (e.g. Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, the Netherlands), centrists/conservatives (Germany, Poland, Croatia), Social Democrats, neoliberals (France) or coalitions of these. > Nah I am not worried about [Russia], they are consistently unable to wage modern war to benefit of us all. Never underestimate the willingness of Russian leaders to sacrifice their population for meat-grinder wars. > In the meantime we arm and train ourselves, stronger Europe is always better for any future scenario, internally and externally. Agreed, the problem is we can't be arsed to actually evolve to a truly federal society anywhere close to the US. Economically there has been a lot of integration happening, but politically... oh that's one hell of a clusterfuck.
- tromp 1y ago> run by the far-right (e.g. Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, the Netherlands), Since the far right PVV stepped out of the Dutch governing coalition, they should now be placed with the centrists/conservatives.
- briangriffinfan 1y agoPromise?
- mrtksn 1y ago>end of Europe How do you picture this? People in Paris disappear with a flash of light and baguettes falling on the ground? Or is ot more like the earth shakes and it all goes under the water? Or maybe something like Europeans collectively decide to do whatever Putin tells them? Or maybe suddenly adopt American and Russian way of life, like Italians burn their Fiat 500's and order Ford F-150's, throw away their wines and start brewing votka? Or maybe turn against each other and break down their functioning trade and cultural relations and just buy Russian and American stuff instead and pay with what? BTW the blaming immigrants and tearing down the social state doesn't work for long because you have finite number of immigrants and social services. If you actually get rid of those and things don't improve people start to notice. A common strategy is to keep blaming those when not doing anything about it or even increase it but the problem with that is, people get tired and actually change you with someone who actually will do something about it and you end up doing something. This something can be to fix the issues and remove the pressure or remove the immigrants and the social sistem and you get a very strong counter action and flushes away those who did it. However way it goes it's not an end or beginning of anything as EU isn't an empire like the US, just bunch of sovereign states in coordination.
- jordanb 1y ago"End of Europe" as a coherent entity that's willing and able to look after its own interests. Even as Ukrainians die in the meat grinder and Germany is lauded as Ukraine's best friend in Europe, millions of dollars of dual-use technology products from Germany continue to transship into Russia via Kazakhstan. Imagine if it was 1942 and Britain was still shipping millions of dollars of weapons components into Germany via Sweden or Switzerland?
- mrtksn 1y agoEurope is far from coherent, even if it is the most coherent that ever has been. Meanwhile, support rate for EU and Eurozone is highest ever among EU member states and Europe as a whole. If anything, people are annoyed that EU struggles to be decisive as Europeans want more EU, not less. This new situation even paved the way for collaboration previously thought to be far fetched dream. I don't know how all this will unfold but if tonight Europe ends as we know it, tomorrow we will have European federation and the discussions won't be about the petty local issues but thinks like EU army etc. as all Europeans are very annoyed by Russia, USA and the current state of affairs in Europe. Check the stats, Europeans don't buy into the agenda pushed by the American libertarians. People want bigger stronger EU to take over where USA abandoned.
- pjc50 1y agoThis looks plausible: > Europe will increasingly be ran by right-wing autocrats shredding the social state and blaming immigrants. This does not: > Ukraine losing the war will be the end of Europe Both the question of losing (the war is somewhat stalemated, and Europe itself is rearming .. although still not breaking dependency on Russian gas!) and the idea that this will somehow "end Europe". If anything, Brexit pretty much demolished similar movements across the EU. The EU's squishyness is mistaken for weakness by too many people who are fans of "muscular" rhetoric.
- tomhow 1y agoPlease don't respond to grand pronouncements about a nation or continent with one of your own. This just perpetuates the kind of flamewar we're trying to avoid here, and thus counts as flamebait, which is explicitly against the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- DaSHacka 1y ago[flagged]
- PaulDavisThe1st 1y agohttps://fosstodon.org/@georgetakei@universeodon.com/114784827172770343 https://fosstodon.org/@georgetakei@universeodon.com/11478482... (proposed/desired reductions in federally funded (NSF) science positions for FY 2026. 250,000 (75%) reduction in numbers) EDIT: see also: https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/american-science-brain-drain/ https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/american-science-bra...
- DaSHacka 1y agoPulling back on federally-funded research grants for the sciences does not address how the economy, hard power, and culture of the States will completely fall off the map leaving an "irrelevant nation" though.
- noobermin 1y agoThe US has no real exports. All of its economic might was because it has its top tier market, and all that wealth is essentially from its soft power and position. The more you peel off that soft power, the weaker that position especially as wealthy and educated people leave. I don't agree that the US won't be relevant, it's more like the US will resemble the position of Russia in the next decade than the position it is in right now.
- hollerith 1y agoThe US is exporting over $3 trillion worth of stuff per year: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/exports https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/exports China exports more, but China also must import more, including more of the things needed for the survival of its people, like food, fertilizer, fuel.
- 1y ago
- tomhow 1y agoPlease don't post grand pronouncements about a nation's merits or future like this. All it does is invite others to respond with opposing grand pronouncements about other countries or regions, leading to what we can see here: a huge flamewar about nations and regions. The guidelines ask us to avoid flamebait. Please make an effort to observe all the guidelines in future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html