4 ms·
>The implication was that the FP32 versions of these kernels have lagged behind the more popular versions. Help me understand this 'cause I'm a bit slow these
by moralestapia 1y ago
>The implication was that the FP32 versions of these kernels have lagged behind the more popular versions.
Help me understand this 'cause I'm a bit slow these days ...
Does that mean optimized FP32 versions of these kernels were already there or not?
- almostgotcaught 1y ago> Help me understand this 'cause I'm a bit slow these days ... If I do `sed 's/f32/f16/g' kernel.cu` does this count as AI? Help me understand because I'm a little slow when it comes to all the dumb shit people attribute to LLMs these days...
- moralestapia 1y agoIndeed, you're slow on these news. >sed 's/f32/f16/g' kernel.cu This is not what's happening here, it's a completely different thing, read TFA.
- imtringued 1y agoYou are a blatant troll and you know that.
- Dylan16807 1y ago> Does that mean optimized FP32 versions of these kernels were already there or not? If you're trying to support your original point with that argument, then you're using some pretty awful definitions of the terms "new algos" and "no pre-existing solutions".