3 ms·
> Nevertheless in a deterministic system you can know a future state without calculating intermediary states. Exactly wrong. See the halting problem
by danbmil99 2y ago
> Nevertheless in a deterministic system you can know a future state without calculating intermediary states.
Exactly wrong. See the halting problem
- frutiger 2y agoIsn't the halting problem about knowing all future states and not a future state?
- froh 2y ago...unless the input tape also is deterministic. "deterministic system" is not "deterministic program"
- coderenegade 2y agoYou know the initial conditions, the position function x(t), the velocity function v(t), and acceleration is constant. Why can't we evaluate the state at any point in time without having to calculate previous states?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- kadoban 2y agoA deterministic system isn't a necessary or sufficient condition to be able to calculate a particular future state without calculating intermediate states. It just happens to work for the system you propose, not all systems of that class.
- revskill 2y agoNot everyone understands that problem.
- ajkjk 2y agoHow so?