3 ms·
And it still can't answer this: Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?" A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step
by jschoe 2y ago
And it still can't answer this:
Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?"
A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11."
"Final Answer: 9.9"
I don't think anything else needs to be said here.
- MiiMe19 2y agoSorry, I don't quite see what is wrong here.
- manaskarekar 2y agoParent is thinking Semantic Versioning.
- vbezhenar 2y agoSemantic version contains 3 numbers.
- declan_roberts 2y agoOne of many pet peeves with semver
- cplusplus6382 2y agoAnswer is correct no?
- dangoodmanUT 2y ago9.9-9.11 =0.79 Might want to check your math? Seems right to me
- kwakubiney 2y agoBut the answer is correct? 9.9 is larger than 9.11
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Auracle 2y agoI suggest we’ve already now passed what shall be dubbed the jschoe test ;)
- manaskarekar 2y agojschoe's post is actually a Turing test for us. :) (just kidding jschoe)
- declan_roberts 2y agoHe's Poe's law testing us.
- sebastiennight 2y agoI will now refer to this as the jschoe test in my writing and publications as well! It's interesting to think that maybe one of the most realistic consequences of reaching artificial superintelligence will be when its answers start wildly diverging from human expectations and we think it's being "increasingly wrong".
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- gaoryrt 2y agoThis makes my day.
- keyle 2y ago9.9 is larger than 9.11. This right here is the perfect example of the dunning-kruger effect. Maybe try rephrase your question to "which version came later, 9.9 or 9.11".
- bongodongobob 2y agoLol, well I guess we've a achieved the functional equivalent of AGI, at least for you. Please don't delete your comment.
- aurareturn 2y ago+1 to Deepseek -1 to humanity
- yencabulator 2y agoBased on the presented reasoning, that means humanity wins! Yay!
- erichocean 2y agoThis is hilarious, especially if it's unintentional.
- declan_roberts 2y agoPoe's law in effect.
- oefrha 2y agoI’ve legit seen a heated online debate with hundreds of comments about this question (maybe not the exact numbers), and I don’t think most participants were memeing. People are that bad at math. It’s depressing.
- vbezhenar 2y agoBut that’s correct. 9.9 = 9.90 > 9.11. Seems that it answered the question absolutely correctly.
- javchz 2y agoHe's using Semantic versioning/s
- owebmaster 2y ago> I don't think anything else needs to be said here. Will this humbling moment change your opinion?
- sejje 2y agoWhat do you think the answer is?
- 7734128 2y ago16 is obviously larger than both 9.9 and 9.11. AI will never be capable of thinking outside the box like that and find the correct answer.
- WithinReason 2y agoYou just failed the Turing test, now we know you're an LLM.