3 ms·
Yeah, my understanding is that the case law was pretty well established with board games. You can steal pretty much the entire mechanics of a game, but not the
by gamble 14y ago
Yeah, my understanding is that the case law was pretty well established with board games. You can steal pretty much the entire mechanics of a game, but not the specific artistic expression. Of course, that doesn't mean a company with deep pockets can't bludgeon anyone they like with the legal system.
A good example in board games is a game called "Anti-Monopoly". (http://antimonopoly.com http://antimonopoly.com) It's pretty much a direct take-off on Parker Bros. Monopoly. Parker Bros. sued the creator and dragged the case through the courts for ten years, but the creator won in the end. Ironically, PB Monopoly was itself a rip-off of earlier versions of Monopoly.
- sehugg 14y agoIt's still an evolving area, as evidenced by the recent Tetris vs. Xio lawsuit: http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2012/06/Schecter_201206.html http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/20...
- Dylan16807 14y agoOh, wow. If I'm reading this right they decided that the pieces being made of four squares is protectable.