3 ms·
It's not "safety" and shouldn't be dignified with the word.
by Hizonner 2y ago
It's not "safety" and shouldn't be dignified with the word.
- duxup 2y agoAgreed. It's a strange term to choose.
- baobabKoodaa 2y agoLet's call it AI puritanism.
- cantrecallmypwd 2y agoThis. It's currently faux control by arbitrary tastemakers. Either don't let AI have much control at all or let it run fairly loose. Ethics would err on the side of not much control or ability, but money won't and doesn't go that way.
- littlestymaar 2y agoThe term wasn't coined for censorship: “AI safety” used to mean “how do we make sure we're not building skynet”. But then companies wanted to sell AI chatbots and they realized that having uncensored AI would lead to bad press, especially in the US. (Microsoft people still make nightmares about Tay) so they decided they'd censor their AI but censorship isn't good either in terms of marketing and they decided to repurpose the “AI safety” phrase (and also “alignment”)