4 ms·
Are transistors per square mm a better metric ?
by arnaudsm 2y ago
Are transistors per square mm a better metric ?
- robertlagrant 2y ago[flagged]
- huijzer 2y agoPer square banana please. This is the internet.
- sumtechguy 2y agoI thought libraries of congress were the correct way to measure?
- rvnx 2y ago1.31 x 10⁻⁸ football fields. (1 football field = 91.44 meters)
- rad_gruchalski 2y ago> (1 football field = 91.44 meters) By? Which football? The real football, or the football played mostly with hands?
- plaguuuuuu 2y ago= 100m if you're using metric football fields
- koakuma-chan 2y agoAmericans need to stop measuring things in feet :)
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoBruh, you're never gonna be a good trad wife as a man. You're just not that pretty.
- dang 2y ago"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- greggsy 2y agoI won’t be surprised if the US plants started referring to the 4NM nodes in their imperial form (1.575 × 10-7”)
- _Algernon_ 2y agoScientific notation would be to logical. Instead they'll make a new tiny unit that subdivides the inch into 1/81975489347.7 of an inch.
- bee_rider 2y agoAngstroms aren’t imperial, but they are non-SI, so if we want to be petty they’d probably be the way to go.
- Dylan16807 2y agoGod yes.