3 ms·
Right: that is it.
by refulgentis 2y ago
Right: that is it.
- IshKebab 2y agoThis has clearly been heavily edited by humans.
- refulgentis 2y agoI'm happy to provide whatever you ask for. With utmost deference, I'm sure you didn't mean anything by it and were just rushed, but just in case...I'd just ask that you'd engage with charity[^3] and clarity[^2] :) I'd also like to point out[^1] --- meaning, I gave it my original code, in toto. So of course you'll see ex. comments. Not sure what else contributed to your analysis, that's where some clarity could help me, help you. [^1](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42421900 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42421900) "I stubbed out my implementation of OpenAI's web socket based realtime API, 1400 LOC over 2 days, mostly by hand while grokking and testing the API. In 32 minutes, I had a brand spanking new batch of code, clean, event-based architecture, 86% test coverage. 1.8 KLOC with tests." [^2](https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) "Be kind...Converse curiously; don't cross-examine." [^3](https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."