4 ms·
An LLM is an application that runs on an operating system like any other application. That the vendor of the operating system has tied it to the operating syste
by thwarted 2y ago
An LLM is an application that runs on an operating system like any other application. That the vendor of the operating system has tied it to the operating system is purely a marketing/force-it-onto-your-device/force-it-in-front-of-your-face play. It's forced bundling, just like Microsoft did with Internet Explorer 20 years ago.
- aurareturn 2y agoI predict that OpenAI will try to circumvent iOS and Android by making their own device. I think it will be similar to Rabbit R1, but not a scam, and a lot more capable. They recently hired Jony Ive on a project - it could be this. I think it'll be a long term goal - maybe in 3-4 years, a device similar to the Rabbit R1 would be viable. It's far too early right now.
- marcus_holmes 2y agoEven if this is true (and I'm not saying it's not), they probably won't create their own OS. They'd be smarter to do what Apple did and clone a BSD (or similar) rather than start afresh.
- aurareturn 2y agoThe LLM would become the OS.
- marcus_holmes 2y agoAn LLM cannot "become" an OS. It can have an OS added to it, for sure, but that's a different thing. LLMs run on top of a software stack that runs on top of an OS. Incorporating that whole stack into a single binary does not mean it "becomes" an OS. And the point stands: you would not write a new OS, even to incorporate it into your LLM. You'd clone a BSD (or similar) and start there.
- aurareturn 2y agoI don't think you're getting the main point. The only application that this physical device would run is ChatGPT (or some successor). You won't be able to install other apps on it like a normal OS. Everything you do is inside this LLM. Underneath, it can be Linux, BSD, Unix, or nothing at all, whatever. It doesn't matter. That's not important. OS was just a convenient phrase to describe this idea.
- guitarlimeo 2y agoI got your main point from the first message, but still don't like redefining terminology like OS to mean what you did.
- aurareturn 2y agoThink of iOS and everything that it does such as downloading apps, opening apps, etc. Replace all of that with ChatGPT. No need to get to the technicals such as whether it's UNIX or Linux talking to the hardware. Just from a pure user experience standpoint, OpenAI would become iOS.
- ogogmad 2y agoI don't think "OS" means anything definitive. It's not 1960. Nowadays, it's a thousand separate things stuck together.
- marcus_holmes 2y agoI think what you mean is "Desktop" not "OS". You're just replacing all the windows, menus and buttons with a chat interface.
- glimshe 2y agoThe LLM can't abstract PCI, USB, SATA etc from itself.
- ogogmad 2y agoWhat counts as an OS is subjective. The concept has always been a growing snowball.
- whywhywhywhy 2y agoWould be extremely surprising if it were anything other than an Android fork. The differentiator is gonna be the LLM, always on listening and the physical interface to it. You're just burning money bothering to rewrite the rest of the stack when off the shelf will save you years.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tightbookkeeper 2y agoI’m not even sure if they can make a website that takes text input to an executable and dumps the output.
- vrighter 2y agoeven then, the llm cannot possibly be a standalone os. For one thing, it cannot execute loops. So even something as simple as enumerating hardware at startup is impossible.
- simonh 2y agoThis is a similar situation to the view that the web would replace operating systems. All we'd need is a browser. I don't think AI is ultimately even an application, it's a feature we will use in applications.
- gpderetta 2y ago> This is a similar situation to the view that the web would replace operating systems. All we'd need is a browser. well, that's not a false statement. As much as I might dislike it, the raise of the web and web applications have made the OS themselves irrelevant for a significant number for tasks.