4 ms·

Yeah, I don't drive but I would think it would be worse than actually paying attention all the time

• pessimizer 2y ago
  It's also a problem that gets worse as the software gets better. Having to intervene once every 5 minutes is a lot easier than having to intervene once every 5 weeks. If lack of intervention causes an accident, I'd bet on the 5 minute car avoiding an accident longer than the 5 week car for any span of time longer than 10 weeks.
  • jakub_g 2y ago
    I feel like the full self driving cars should have a "budget". Every time you drive, say, 1000 km in FSD, you then need to drive 100 km in "normal" mode to keep sharp. Or whatever the ratio / exact numbers TBD. You can reset the counter upfront by driving smaller mileage more regularly.
    • Dylan16807 2y ago
      Just as driving practice? It's not going to help the problem of keeping up vigilance when monitoring a level 3 system.
    • krisoft 2y ago
      That's not solving the right problem. That keeps you sharp driving, but does not keep you sharp supervising. If the car did drive you 1000 km flawlessly, but can still kill you with a random erratic bug on the 1001th km (or on the 1234th). That is where people will zone out. Keeping people driving will keep them able to drive, but won't make them less zoned out when they are not driving.
• lopkeny12ko 2y ago
  You are required to pay attention all the time. That's what the "supervised" in "FSD (supervised)" means.
  • freejazz 2y ago
    FSD stands for Fully Supervised Driving, right?
    • dhdaadhd 2y ago
      yeah, that sounds like Elon’s marketing to me.
    • noapologies 2y ago
      Same energy as Unlimited Data!! (up to 100GB)
  • Fomite 2y ago
    The point is the transition from "Driving Supervisor" to "Driver" is non-trivial in terms of time.
• rcxdude 2y ago
  It's more like being a driving instructor, which has a higher effort and skill bar than just driving.
• faggotbreath 2y ago
  [dead]