3 ms·

I don’t know. I find quanta articles very high noise. It’s always hyping something

• jll29 2y ago
  I don't find the language of the article full of "hype"; they describe the history of different forms of imputation from single to multiple to ML-based. The table is particularly useful as it describes what the article is all about in a way that can stick to students' minds. I'm very grateful for QuantaMagazine for its popular science reporting.
  • billfruit 2y ago
    The Quanta articles usually have a gossipy style and are very low information density.
    • SAI_Peregrinus 2y ago
      They're usually more science history than science. Who did what, when, and a basic ovnrview of why it's important.
• vouaobrasil 2y ago
  I agree with that. I skip the Quanta magazine articles, mainly because the titles seem to be a little to hyped for my taste and don't represent the content as well as they should.
  • amelius 2y ago
    Yes, typically a short conversation with an LLM gives me more info and understanding of a topic than reading a Quanta article.
  • xiaodai 2y ago
    Same. I think it does disservice to math.
• MiddleMan5 2y ago
  Curious, what sites would you recommend?