4 ms·
If Microsoft cares about the environment and becoming carbon-negative by 2030, why the seemingly arbitrary hardware restrictions that are pushing consumers to r
by a2128 2y ago
If Microsoft cares about the environment and becoming carbon-negative by 2030, why the seemingly arbitrary hardware restrictions that are pushing consumers to replace hardware that's still modest today?
- whatevaa 2y agoThey don't care, simple as that.
- add-sub-mul-div 2y agoLiterally no one is going to throw away a working computer running Windows 10. There are still a lot of people running Windows 7. This is a nonsensical talking point.
- Dylan16807 2y agoA lot of people don't want to go without security patches. It's barely over a year until EOL for 10.
- add-sub-mul-div 2y agoThe vast majority of people still running Windows 10 won't even know what an EOL date is or why they should care. Businesses or anyone else who really cares can pay for the security fixes that will continue beyond 2025.
- serf 2y ago>The vast majority of people still running Windows 10 won't even know what an EOL date is or why they should care Microsoft has been doing a lot in recent years to make people care, including (but not limited to) pop-ups near EOL that throw a scare into people.[0] [0]: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/you-received-a-notification-your-windows-7-pc-is-out-of-support-3278599f-9613-5cc1-e0ee-4f81f623adcf https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/you-received-a-not...
- antifa 2y agoUsers are probably so use to dismissing all these pop-ups of things like the ghost of clippy trying to trick you into using one drive that they don't even know what pop up #6446 says.
- a2128 2y agoMicrosoft is putting a shiny new version in front of people's faces, with marketing about advanced AI features, security, etc, and then telling them their hardware isn't supported. Even if Windows 10 is still receiving security patches, your average person is likely going to have the fear of missing out on something great, maybe getting left behind in the AI race by not having Copilot. The logical next choice is to consider buying a new computer just to make sure they're running the latest and greatest, because Microsoft told them it's the only way. If you spend a lot of time in tech circles, it's easy to get the impression that literally no one really thinks like this. A lot of us may think Windows 11 is mostly just a reskin with some integrated AI bloat that can be mostly replaced with just a bookmark to ChatGPT, but you would have a real hard time explaining that to an average non-techie. These decisions have significant effects on the choices average people make, and you can't just ignore it and assume everyone knows better Considering there are around twice as many Linux desktop users as Windows 7 (according to Statcounter global stats), I would hardly call it a lot of people
- Rinzler89 2y ago>why the seemingly arbitrary hardware restrictions HW restrictions are not arbitrary. TPM is a requirement for added security (Macs and smartphones also had TPM for a long time now), and CPUs before 8th gen don't have functional HW instructions needed for VBS (virtualization based security) which also adds to Windows 11 security hardening. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000094905/processors.html https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000... https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/de...
- echoangle 2y agoAre they only implementing the additional hardening now? Or is it only required by now? Because obviously it worked before, so something must have changed.
- Rinzler89 2y agoNow? Hardening was in place since 2021 when Windows 11 launched. The HW requirement haven't changed since then.
- echoangle 2y agoBut it was possible to circumvent it without any problem, which it won’t be in the future. That’s literally what the Article is about. So what changed?
- Rinzler89 2y agoThe better question would be why they allowed the bypass in the first place since MS made the TPM and CPU requirements quite clear from day one, and why people are surprised the requirements are being enforced.
- echoangle 2y agoWell as far as I know there was no loss of functionality from the bypass, so either the requirement is completely arbitrary to deprecate old devices or there will be new features in the future that depend on the TPM.
- eps 2y agoMicrosoft cares about creating end-to-end secure media delivery from the Hollywood to your monitor. They always did, ever since the introduction of Protected Media Path (PMP) in Windows 2000, followed by tightening of the kernel access and now requiring the TPM. The end goal is to take away full control of the machines from their owners. It's been a very long game for them, but they are almost there. And then they will have fun.
- jiggawatts 2y agoThese media copy protection schemes remind me of web application firewalls. They're both digital snake oil, but huge corporations keep buying them. It's absurd that I have a Netflix subscription, but the easiest way to watch Netflix 4K content on my PC is to just download it from a bay filled with pirates.