3 ms·
Why is it that whenever a company happens to be successful, and does meetings/goals differently than most (also successful) companies, the success is attributed
by mvkel 2y ago
Why is it that whenever a company happens to be successful, and does meetings/goals differently than most (also successful) companies, the success is attributed to the lack of meetings/goals, and not, y'know, the business?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- api 2y agoBeing the GitHub of AI models is like the thing to be for the last two years when it comes to scaling. I'm surprised it was only 300% not like 2000%. Not trash talking them, just agreeing that there are other factors.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoI read your comment as: > Why is it X and not, y'know, X? Is there something central to what a business is besides the way communication happens within it?
- mvkel 2y agoYes. They make things that people will pay for.
- snapcaster 2y agoI think there are a few reasons for this. The primary one is that it's a visible signal, and people make attribution errors almost constantly so it gets fixated on. I think the other reason might be that it's unpopular (and not actionable) to say "this company succeeded because the people there are better than you" or "this company had great product market fit, and the employees efforts really didn't make the difference"