5 ms·
A sad day for humanity when death, the great equalizer, gets closer to being controlled by rich people. Not that rich people not already have access to better h
by thomasdeleeuw 2y ago
A sad day for humanity when death, the great equalizer, gets closer to being controlled by rich people. Not that rich people not already have access to better healthcare, but still.
- worldsayshi 2y agoWhat if it gets controlled by everyone?
- tetris11 2y agoIt could be a flip of a coin. Craig Venter[0] almost patented what was back then the human reference genome (based on his own genome), but thankfully publicly funded efforts prevailed to taper the profiteering. We could be in a similar situation with anti-aging drugs. Plus, with citizen science projects making ad-hoc labs more accessible than ever, there's a good chance that normal people could make their own versions of these anti-aging drugs, assuming that science journals and informatic pipelines remain accessible (the current rent-seeking of top journals lends some small but worrying evidence against this). 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Venter#Human_Genome_Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Venter#Human_Genome_Proj...
- vsuperpower2020 2y agoGreat, now communists are going after longer lifespans again.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> sad day for humanity when death, the great equalizer, gets closer to being controlled by rich people Sadder day for those who only sees tragedy in progress.
- unsupp0rted 2y agoWhy can’t we all live in caves and chase our prey across the savannah, all equal, until a broken leg or an infected scratch causes certain death, like nature intended?
- sgu999 2y agoTo others: how are these kind of arguments called? "We probably or may not need X" "Alright you go back to eating bananas in a tree then!" EDIT: Had forgotten for a second that we can know ask this kind of questions to a computer, "straw man argument".
- interstice 2y agoReductio ad absurdum. Possibly
- d_tr 2y agoWhere X = "Starting to rot from the inside out as soon as we hit forty, while simultaneously watching loved ones age badly and becoming decreasingly self-sufficient, at best." Yeah, who needs "X". I won't even bother with the "the rich" stuff, because, frankly, it's too tired, pathetic, childish and naive.
- Devasta 2y agoMight just be me, but I don't think the world would be a better place with a separate caste of immortals controlling the world governments and resources. Crazy, I know.
- d_tr 2y agoIt's not crazy, no one thinks that. My question is why do so many people think of and fear this as a plausible scenario, to the point they prefer to rot and die than see progress in that front. Now this is crazy.
- Devasta 2y agoBecause if you were a billionaire who had the ability to make people live forever, why would you let the working class have it and not just keep it for you and your immediate family?
- 2y ago
- cess11 2y ago"That’s what I like about death, it’s democratic. It would irritate me if you could jog and live forever and I got stuck here smoking and having a good time and died over it. No, you’ll die too, you know, you’ll have thirty four more years to run up and down the stairmaster." https://rickroderick.org/302-heidegger-and-the-rejection-of-humanism-1993/ https://rickroderick.org/302-heidegger-and-the-rejection-of-...
- 65656533ddd 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]