3 ms·
Ok, this wasn't clear to me. Perhaps it was a video with too few views and thus not considered worth spending storage on? I mean, popular videos on youtube have
by The_Colonel 2y ago
Ok, this wasn't clear to me. Perhaps it was a video with too few views and thus not considered worth spending storage on? I mean, popular videos on youtube have up to 4K and pretty high bitrate.
- sambazi 2y agoseems more like gog/yt shifted bitrate/resolution downwards because pleps demand 4k, and now the "High Definition" version that was good enough for cinemas looks like crap.
- Dylan16807 2y agoIt has 2.6 million views. But the source was 720p, and youtube's bandwidth tiers are tied directly to resolution and most of them are stingy.