3 ms·
> In other words, in the absence of RoI measures, the percent of engineering time spent on value-add activities is a pretty good proxy for productivity. What a
by vouaobrasil 3y ago
> In other words, in the absence of RoI measures, the percent of engineering time spent on value-add activities is a pretty good proxy for productivity.
What about using self-rated satisfaction of your workers in terms of how happy they are with their engineering solutions? I find that when I solve a really nice problem and add something that is cool, or fix a very annoying bug, I feel very satisfied with the result. Whereas, I have produced things in the past (when I worked as a programmer) that seemed to make management happy that I wasn't satisfied with, and it seemed to me at least that the results weren't as useful in the end.
- yen223 3y agoTo put it bluntly, Goodhart's law will really kick your ass if you went with that.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mjr00 3y agoThis is way too subjective; I've met way too many developers throughout my career who loved to spend their time crafting "perfect" code rather than deliver customer-facing value for this to work as a measure that aligns with business objectives.
- jimbokun 3y agoUseful to know, but different from productivity.