5 ms·
WD Ultrastar Transporter: Briefcase with 368TB of NVMe SSD, 128GB RAM, 1300W PSU
- andrewstuart 3y agoCarry that through airport security and you are definitely being detained.
- newsclues 3y agoYou’d be surprised how common it is for video crews to travel with gear like this in carry on to get it there for a shoot.
- datadrivenangel 3y agoMy photographer mates have great stories about impressing airport security with the density of their gear, and of flagrantly getting away with 3-5 times the weight allowances for their carryon bags.
- hirako2000 3y agoFor what?
- andrewstuart 3y agoUntil they determine what it is?
- Ekaros 3y agoJust think how long will it take for them to upload it all to NSA over connection they have at border...
- hulitu 3y agoNSA already has the data. /s
- prmoustache 3y agoWhy are you assuming this computer is not backdoored for a start?
- ssl-3 3y agoIt's just a computer, and a fairly compact one at that. To you, it may seem like a very fancy computer that is made of pure unobtanium. To a person running the X-ray machine, it's just another computer, and not too dissimilar from the thousands of other computers they've seen already this week.
- userbinator 3y ago...except for the unusually large amount of NAND flash ICs that are certainly going to be visible.
- LeoPanthera 3y agoIt's weird that there's a server in there. Seems like a waste of space and weight. Why not just a thunderbolt interface?
- Ekaros 3y ago2x200 Gb network... Compared to 80 Gb that is 5 times faster...
- LeoPanthera 3y agoI wonder if that's a typo though. 200G ethernet does exist, as part of the "Terabit Ethernet" standard, but it's extremely rare and you'd have trouble finding anything to connect it to that could negotiate that fast.
- jdsully 3y agoSwitches are crazy expensive but optics are easily available... here's a 400G for less than $500 https://www.fs.com/products/110530.html https://www.fs.com/products/110530.html 200G switches are about the cost of a small car, but if your buying this thing that is probably not a showstopper: https://www.wiredzone.com/shop/product/10023793-supermicro-sse-sn3700-vs2rc-100g-200g-ethernet-switch-offers-32x-qsfp56-ports-regular-airflow-front-to-back-9871 https://www.wiredzone.com/shop/product/10023793-supermicro-s...
- zaroth 3y agoI think it’s just a typo.
- zettabomb 3y agoIt's not "extremely rare" in the intended market. It'll still take you over 2 hours to fill this, if you manage to saturate both links (which you can't realistically do).
- Hikikomori 3y agoDoesn't most vendors sell switches capable of that?
- Ekaros 3y agoNo HDMI? Still interesting piece of kit.
- Rinzler89 3y agoWhy would they pay the HDMI licensing fees and waste time routing the PCB traces for HDMI signals just for this? The video port is only for diagnostics, not watching Netflix on it, and for that it's perfect.
- extraduder_ire 3y agoIt'd be a convenient add-on for the $2 licensing (IIRC) it costs for the port, so you can use common displays. I'd expect displayport to be more likely to be added though. Sadly, I think part of the HDMI licence means you can't put analogue outputs on a device with a HDMI port after a certain year. (2014, I think. It was before then that I read that)
- Rinzler89 3y ago> so you can use common displays VGA capable displays ARE common where this thing will be used (racks, movie sets/studios, etc). Plus, those display outputs are for emergencies only as this will always be used headless all the time. You'll get your GUI video output from the thin client connected to that thing over the network. >I'd expect displayport to be more likely to be added though. Not in severs. You don't want to waste PCI-E lanes for driving a display output that will never be used and that server chip doesn't even have an iGPU anyway. Plus, the VGA output is most likely only displays what the motherboard controller is doing and can't display the GUI of the OS running on the CPU. Also, the VGA connector is miles more robust and fault tolerant than digital outputs where if the handshake fails you get no picture.
- Ekaros 3y agoOn other hand, just imagine how awesome mediabox this would be? Not that anyone will ever use it as one, but you could fit enough content for very long time.
- 3y ago
- egeozcan 3y agoYou are jumping on a private plane with one of these devices because of some emergency in a data center... Who are you? What's your job? What kind of choices in life brought you to this point? I really wonder, it's so alien.
- haunter 3y agoFilm production crew although it doesn't have a video digital out. But you might not even need it if you are only after storage, 8K RedCode raw is around ~7TB / hours
- Sakos 3y agoIt's not that alien. We recently migrated to a different storage provider and used something like this to move 200TB of data. Seems like a fancier version of the Google transfer appliance (https://cloud.google.com/transfer-appliance/docs/4.0/overview https://cloud.google.com/transfer-appliance/docs/4.0/overvie...).
- SloopJon 3y agoThis could be useful for bootstrapping a shared-nothing cluster or a disaster recovery node. A comparable amount of space in a storage array might occupy a 2-4U chassis, which would be somewhat less convenient to transport. This thing isn't going to be cheap, so you'd probably want a more frequent transfer to justify it. Maybe sneaker net database journals or backups every week?
- jauer 3y agoTAA-compliant, so some portion of the target market is US government and related contractors.
- elorant 3y agoA data center has backup plans. This is more for data on the go. Think of a fashion show where the production shoots tens of TBs in high resolution and they can’t afford to setup a server room because it would be impractical. You get one of these and you’re done.
- orbital-decay 3y ago
- neglesaks 3y agoNo price mentioned. How much does this fetch? Quarter of a million bucks?
- userbinator 3y agoSSDs are currently around $100/TB, and a computer with those specs won't be over $10k, so my rough estimate is that this will cost less than $50k.
- elorant 3y agoWhy would it cost that much? A 30TB nvme costs about $3k. You need 12 of those, so that’s like 36k. Add another $4k for the rest of the hardware and the case. Plus a little overhead since it’s a branded item, it shouldn’t be more than $50k.
- lastitude 3y agoAs a data hoarder, this turns me on.
- userbinator 3y agoUnfortunately it's probably not meant for long-term storage, and thus they may be using the highest density flash available, which means relatively short retention.
- mosselman 3y agoI haven’t looked into durability of flash before. How do I recognise the high density? What is the unit or indicator I have to look for?
- userbinator 3y agoSLC is the best, then MLC, TLC, QLC, and now maybe PLC flash in order of decreasing endurance and retention.
- neilv 3y agoCould be used for data migration between providers, like an AWS Snowball. https://aws.amazon.com/getting-started/projects/migrate-petabyte-scale-data/services-costs/ https://aws.amazon.com/getting-started/projects/migrate-peta... Or for selling the user-created content entrusted to your company, to a company doing ML training. (The metal "briefcase" suggests doing it like an illicit trafficker exchange, maybe meeting in the middle of a bridge, or in an abandoned industrial site.)
- EdwardCoffin 3y agoJim Gray talked about this idea in an ACM Queue interview in 2001 [1] calling it a TeraScale SneakerNet box: Another option is to send whole computers. I’ve been sending NTFS disks (the Windows file system format), and not every Linux system can read NTFS. So lately I’m sending complete computers. We’re now into the 2-terabyte realm, so we can’t actually send a single disk; we need to send a bunch of disks. It’s convenient to send them packaged inside a metal box that just happens to have a processor in it. I know this sounds crazy—but you get an NFS or CIFS server and most people can just plug the thing into the wall and into the network and then copy the data. [1] https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=864078 https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=864078
- bpye 3y ago> We’re now into the 2-terabyte realm, so we can’t actually send a single disk; we need to send a bunch of disks. It always amuses me reading old articles about things like data storage. These days you can get a 2TB SD card.
- squigz 3y agohttps://www.westerndigital.com/products/data-center-platforms/ultrastar-transporter?sku=1ES2562 https://www.westerndigital.com/products/data-center-platform...
- Animats 3y agoAWS has a whole line of these, their "Snow" product line.[1] There's the "Snowcone", the "Snowball", and, for those really big transfers, the "Snowmobile".[2] [1] https://aws.amazon.com/snow/ https://aws.amazon.com/snow/ [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vQmTZTq7nw&t=109s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vQmTZTq7nw&t=109s
- synack 3y agoRumors that they're discontinuing the snowmobile service: https://twitter.com/0xdabbad00/status/1776999225550938124 https://twitter.com/0xdabbad00/status/1776999225550938124
- crote 3y agoI'm not too surprised. There aren't that many parties with 100PB of data looking to switch from on-prem to the cloud. If you haven't migrated in the last 8 years already, you're probably never going to. Keeping that truck around isn't exactly cheap either. I reckon it reached its technical or economic lifespan and simply isn't worth replacing.
- AstroJetson 3y agoNever underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes - from a lifetime ago when we moved full systems backups from East Aurora to Chicago.
- remram 3y agoThis is still a common thing. Amazon has AWS Snowball [1] (up to 210 TB), Backblaze has Fireball [2] (96 TB), GCP has Transfer Appliance [3] (300 TB) and I'm sure there are others. They ship it to you, you fill it up (over S3 API for example) and send it back. [1]: https://aws.amazon.com/snowball/ https://aws.amazon.com/snowball/ [2]: https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/features/fireball-data-migration https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/features/fireball-da... [3]: https://cloud.google.com/transfer-appliance/docs/4.0/overview https://cloud.google.com/transfer-appliance/docs/4.0/overvie...
- Gud 3y agoI wonder if it's possible to start a moving company doing this? Buy a VW transporter and fill it up with SSDs...
- remram 3y agoMy gut reaction is that either people are moving data to another of their locations, in which case they have disks they can ship with regular transporters, or they are moving to the cloud, and they can use the cloud's transportation service. I might be wrong though!
- perihelions 3y agoIs it available in keychain form factor?
- graycat 3y agoHow long to transmit the 368 TB? Each Ethernet port is at 200 Gb, that is, 200 billion bits per second or about 20 billion bytes per second or 20 BBs. Two such ports are 40 BBps The 368 TB is 368,000 GB So, the transmit time is at least 368,000 / ( 40 * 3600 ) = 2.556 hours
- nyx 3y agoIt's 200GbE. Assuming you could actually fully saturate both of those links, it would only take a couple of hours to copy off the entire capacity. I think you'd more likely be capped by the write speed of the destination storage?
- c_o_n_v_e_x 3y agoIf anyone is wondering, the business case for this kind of hardware is by avoiding paying public internet data egress and other fees when transferring data between cloud providers or your own on-prem DC. Some Data center providers have their own fiber networks to enable transfers at rates below what you'd pay to transfer via public. Seagate offers a similar solution but as a service.. Lyve. Their hardware uses "docking stations" and portable unit with storage. As others have mentioned, Amazon has a similar device/service but it can be used only for transferring data into Amazon afaik.