burnte

4 ms·

1.
by burnte 6d ago
Both are fascinating. I've had a pet theory for 30 years that there is not a single "mind" but that we're made up of more isolated aspects that do different things and working in concert we come up with our idea of &quot
2.
by burnte 6d ago
No one but you said "non important."
3.
by burnte 12d ago
It's not that cut and dry or else search engines wouldn't be legal. It depends on how much is used, for what context, etc. This very well may wind up being fair use.
4.
by burnte 16d ago
> He has absolute control and ownership over the WordPress project The only thing he has that can't be moved or recreated are the trademarks. In an extremely short span of time everyone went from Xfree for their X server to Xorg, an
5.
by burnte 16d ago
> I made this point at the time but Tailwind Labs' business model shouldn't exist. It doesn't anymore. There are tens of thousands of businesses that have only been able to exist for a short time due to gaps in the market
6.
by burnte 16d ago
Sounds like AI saw terminals and the word "race" and assumed it was for exploiting race conditions.
7.
by burnte 17d ago
It's been getting worse for months. I literally tweeted yesterday that Claude has ADHD and nothing I do will keep him focused. It's not entirely true though, I have found if I'm rude and mean it stays on track a lot better bu
8.
by burnte 19d ago
Agreed. The stock firmware is virtually unusable. Extremely clunky, nothing renders right, moving books is a PITA, etc. Crosspoint makes it worth the $70. Without crosspoint, just don't buy it.
9.
by burnte 23d ago
> First: it thought that html and javascript were the means by which common people would express themselves. The dot com bubble thought everyone would have a website. As it turns out, normal people prefer expressing themselves with text,
10.
by burnte 24d ago
> The "Just buy a new computer" excuse doesn't actually make the tradeoff no longer a tradeoff. I think you accidentally responded to the wrong comment, I didn't make any excuses or debate tradeoffs. I said "thin
11.
by burnte 25d ago
> Chrome's multiprocess sandboxing wasn't unambiguously good. It carried a steep cost in overhead. This is true, but this is why we create faster and faster PCs, so our software can do more. The cost was because you were gettin
12.
by burnte 25d ago
Yep, Chrome was great but the past few years they're obviously moving the wrong way. I'm completely off of Chrome, back to Firefox and Brave.
13.
by burnte 26d ago
No, keeping it disabled makes zero sense. There's no reason now to force people to enable it. Most people don't even know you can do it in windows so it's not like there's a huge problem for them. No reason not to leave
14.
by burnte 28d ago
You're not wrong, I get baited too easily. I appreciate your words and I'll keep working on it.
15.
by burnte 28d ago
Because it's stupid. Why would accessibility features enabled by default on Windows and Linux be disabled by default in MacOS? There is literally zero advantage to disabling it, and it makes life harder on users. Same thing with tap to
16.
by burnte 28d ago
I cannot think of a single reason these would be disabled by default other than Apple stubbornness.
17.
by burnte 29d ago
In the practices in which I've worked, proper screening and expertise in treatment delivery boost outcome rates significantly. We see well over 60% success rates with the first round. > This is the only factually true statement in y
18.
by burnte 29d ago
No, I have proof, I work in mental health, I'm part of our research committee's board, I see the actual data from our patients, other studies, the discussions about the data, etc. You simply completely ignored my core statement. I
19.
by burnte 29d ago
> Best way to manage the withdrawal would be to dramatically reduce them being prescribed in the first place. No, that will just hurt more people up front for longer. The truth is antidepressants have a larger effect on mental health tha
20.
by burnte 29d ago
I just for the one that's a hair smaller than the 4, flashed it with Crosspoint, and man, I'm pretty happy with it.
21.
by burnte 29d ago
That's been my experience too. That has lead to a small community and little real excitement around them.
22.
by burnte 1mo ago
They license the IP that they design. They design complete chips you can buy and go right to tape out with no changes if you want.
23.
by burnte 1mo ago
Yep, they were the vanguard of "fuck you I need to get mine at all costs."
24.
by burnte 1mo ago
Law moves slowly, a 2 month old article isn't old in that perspective.
25.
by burnte 1mo ago
I talked about SDKs not APIs. No one thinks iPhoneOS was created without the ability to support apps, Steve Jobs' comment about web-only apps being the future is known bs. I also didn't say anything about revenue. One does not nee
26.
by burnte 1mo ago
The chips cost under $100 even for top tier modems from Qualcomm.
27.
by burnte 1mo ago
> I'm worried about that OpenAI is doing Sam Altman has demonstrated he's willing to lie, so I agree, I don't trust OAI.
28.
by burnte 1mo ago
They absolutely will, but I've been on the provider side of healthcare for over a decade and I can assure you there are lots of organizations who are EAGER to move to single payer and will absolutely help the fight. If you told a healt
29.
by burnte 1mo ago
> How do you not use their SDK? The first third party iPhone apps existed before the SDK existed. iPhone OS was jailbroken pretty quickly and apps emerged fast. SDKs are nice references and tools but the're not the only way to skin
30.
by burnte 1mo ago
Generally in our IT jargon writing "vRAM" would mean some sort of virtualized RAM thing, while VRAM shows the V is part of the initialism and thus VIDEO RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY. Nothing formal, just informal usage.

More ›