5 ms·

Interesting. I understood it immediately, but I'm a pretty smart guy and can comprehend things without them being explicit, so I asked Claude.ai to see if it co

Interesting. I understood it immediately, but I'm a pretty smart guy and can comprehend things without them being explicit, so I asked Claude.ai to see if it could do it. > Prompt: I saw a headline titled "Ford's Battery Flagship Socked by Mold Sickness, Workers Say". What do they mean by "flagship", a literal ship? > Claude Opus: No, in this context, "flagship" is not referring to a literal ship. In business and marketing, the term "flagship" is often used to describe the most important or leading product, location, or division of a company. > In the headline you mentioned, "Ford's Battery Flagship" likely refers to the company's primary or most advanced battery manufacturing facility or division. This facility or division is considered the "flagship" because it plays a crucial role in Ford's strategy to develop and produce batteries for their electric vehicles. > So, when the headline states that the "Battery Flagship" is "Socked by Mold Sickness," it means that this important battery facility is facing issues related to mold growth, which is reportedly causing health problems for the workers. But Claude Opus is a remarkable LLM. Very powerful. Mixtral 8x7B quantized down to 4 bits is also a remarkable LLM, but much smaller and runs on my laptop. I gave it the same prompt. > Mixtral 8x7b: "Flagship" in this context refers to the main facility or center of operation for a certain activity or product. In this case, it refers to Ford's main battery production plant. That was generated in 1.2 s. Not bad. Checking the actual article, it appears that is what the article is about. In a world-modeling and text-comprehension sense these models appear to beat many human beings on meaning inference in ambiguous contexts. Quite cool! One can imagine a future where humans without this inference skill can use a rapid-response text model to auto-translate things down to their comprehension level. After all, this entire discussion tree is a discussion about communication breakdown. It would be entirely obviated if these LLMs were placed in the comprehension path. Then we'd be operating at a higher level of discussion: talking about the referent rather than the reference, so to speak!

Pamar 3y ago
While I understand fairly well what "Flagship" means in business context... my immediate assumption would be "top EC model", considering that Ford is an automotive brand. To give you another example: if I read "Uniqlo flagship in Berlin is plagued by mold" I immediately understand the implied term (flagship STORE) but if the title say omits "in Berlin" I would try to figure out if maybe there is a new type of mold that destroy... what? Heattech? Pima cotton?
arrakeenrevived 3y ago
I think my original comment about "flagship" was worded poorly, and has led this thread down a path I didn't intend. I know what "flagship" means, and I did correctly assume that the article was trying to convey importance of _something_ related to Ford (my first thought was a flagship car model, but after reading the article I can infer it's about some sort of factory). My gripe with the title is that the article doesn't actually explain why or how it is important, and just assumes you will take the "Ford's Flagship..." description at face value and trust the author that it's important. It's unsurprising to me that an LLM would interpret it this way, because you asked it to just interpret the headline, which it did. However, in _my_ reading of the article, I'm skeptical of the "Flagship" claim in the article because 1) it is never really explained and 2) the article seems to be going extra hard (too hard) to imply this is a big deal by attaching a bunch of other names (Joe Biden, Department of Energy, Inflation Reduction Act, multiple contracting companies, a SK investment company, state of Kentucky) to the project, but again never really explains why or how. It's almost like the journalistic equivalent of an appeal to authority, I guess.
Dylan16807 3y ago
I normally don't like AI quoting comments but I think you're fine here. Complaining that "flagship" has to be an adjective unless it's literally a ship is silly. I have some issues with the title, but not flagship-as-noun.
- renewiltord 3y ago
  Yeah, I know the forum dislikes LLM-posted comments but I thought it was a pretty good opportunity to show how it could improve human-to-human comms. I think if we'd like we could each get a lot more information extraction ability from the world with this new machinery. We think about the technology as accelerating development of other stuff purely through generation: code, images, video, sound. But it could actually accelerate comprehension of text because in many cases its skill at teasing out value outstrips ours. The future is bright!
  - refulgentis 3y ago
    It's dumb: - OP didn't say they didn't know what it meant - it doesn't help improve human-to-human comms to have someone: -- take up 80% of my screen -- with a copy-and-pasted obvious take -- unedited -- from a text generator -- that has been RLHF'd to chain of thought I love LLMs and quit my job to work with them, but this ain't it, or an opportunity to extol about bright futures and stuff.
    - Dylan16807 3y ago
      > OP didn't say they didn't know what it meant They said it makes no sense, so yes they did say that. > it doesn't help improve human-to-human comms to have someone: It's what the comment deserved for saying it makes no sense. Showing the dumb AI understands instantly. And the conversation was already an overly large tangent.
      - refulgentis 3y ago
        > They said it makes no sense, No, they didn't

Pamar 3y ago

While I understand fairly well what "Flagship" means in business context... my immediate assumption would be "top EC model", considering that Ford is an automotive brand. To give you another example: if I read "Uniqlo flagship in Berlin is plagued by mold" I immediately understand the implied term (flagship STORE) but if the title say omits "in Berlin" I would try to figure out if maybe there is a new type of mold that destroy... what? Heattech? Pima cotton?

arrakeenrevived 3y ago

I think my original comment about "flagship" was worded poorly, and has led this thread down a path I didn't intend. I know what "flagship" means, and I did correctly assume that the article was trying to convey importance of _something_ related to Ford (my first thought was a flagship car model, but after reading the article I can infer it's about some sort of factory). My gripe with the title is that the article doesn't actually explain why or how it is important, and just assumes you will take the "Ford's Flagship..." description at face value and trust the author that it's important. It's unsurprising to me that an LLM would interpret it this way, because you asked it to just interpret the headline, which it did. However, in _my_ reading of the article, I'm skeptical of the "Flagship" claim in the article because 1) it is never really explained and 2) the article seems to be going extra hard (too hard) to imply this is a big deal by attaching a bunch of other names (Joe Biden, Department of Energy, Inflation Reduction Act, multiple contracting companies, a SK investment company, state of Kentucky) to the project, but again never really explains why or how. It's almost like the journalistic equivalent of an appeal to authority, I guess.

Dylan16807 3y ago

I normally don't like AI quoting comments but I think you're fine here. Complaining that "flagship" has to be an adjective unless it's literally a ship is silly. I have some issues with the title, but not flagship-as-noun.

renewiltord 3y ago
Yeah, I know the forum dislikes LLM-posted comments but I thought it was a pretty good opportunity to show how it could improve human-to-human comms. I think if we'd like we could each get a lot more information extraction ability from the world with this new machinery. We think about the technology as accelerating development of other stuff purely through generation: code, images, video, sound. But it could actually accelerate comprehension of text because in many cases its skill at teasing out value outstrips ours. The future is bright!
- refulgentis 3y ago
  It's dumb: - OP didn't say they didn't know what it meant - it doesn't help improve human-to-human comms to have someone: -- take up 80% of my screen -- with a copy-and-pasted obvious take -- unedited -- from a text generator -- that has been RLHF'd to chain of thought I love LLMs and quit my job to work with them, but this ain't it, or an opportunity to extol about bright futures and stuff.
  - Dylan16807 3y ago
    > OP didn't say they didn't know what it meant They said it makes no sense, so yes they did say that. > it doesn't help improve human-to-human comms to have someone: It's what the comment deserved for saying it makes no sense. Showing the dumb AI understands instantly. And the conversation was already an overly large tangent.
    - refulgentis 3y ago
      > They said it makes no sense, No, they didn't