7 ms·

Advice to programmers: Get a government job

25 points by bokonist 18y ago

Anon84 18y ago
This might be the answer to a previous post... http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=394609 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=394609
Dilpil 18y ago
Unless of course you actually want to produce quality software.
- aswanson 18y ago
  Like what, another buggy facebook app or social site? The software running on the FAA flight control systems, DOD command and comms systems, and satellite navigations outclass pretty much anything I've seen from the startup space in terms of quality.
  - alex_c 18y ago
    What percentage - by whatever measurement you want, lines of code, man hours, whatever - do those make up of all software written by government organizations?
  - sofal 18y ago
    The software running on the FAA flight control systems, DOD command and comms systems, and satellite navigations outclass pretty much anything I've seen from the startup space in terms of quality. It sounds glorious, doesn't it? I wrote software for submarines. The innovation is outsourced and is done long before these systems start development. It's all about integration and stifling quality control. More effort is spent on generating paperwork than on developing the system. A corporate government contractor will bend over to get a contract, letting the customer dictate the details of the design (for example: specifying that CORBA must be used for all inter-process communication). The "quality" of the software comes from taking horrible code and beating it into submission with QA over the course of months. The user interfaces that come out of this process make me pity the poor sailors. Coming up with these impressive technologies and then integrating them into real systems are two completely different activities, separated temporally by about a decade. The glory rests with the former only.
    - dgabriel 18y ago
      Did you work for NUWC? I think they use BBN for most of their contract needs, and BBN is pretty quality conscious.
  - olefoo 18y ago
    Most of that is written by contractors, not government employees. And for most startups the money they could spend training programmers and investing in methods and process is better spent getting something, anything, out there, on the street producing revenue.
matthavener 18y ago
depends on what you really want out of a job. if you want security and less stress gov't is the way to go. but you're also going to find people that don't care about quality, "doing it right", the latest technologies, learning, working hard, or sometimes working at all. you deal with the biggest bureaucracy in america... working for the gov't seems to be the opposite of the values purported by hn posts
- Devilboy 18y ago
  Exactly why you SHOULD consider a government job. We need people willing to rock the boat from the inside if we want things to change.
  - johns 18y ago
    Except for that its exceedingly difficult to accomplish anything of worth without some political influence outside of your sections control. Doesn't matter how much buy in you can get from your management, you're still in the end at the mercy of someone else's political whims.
    - pmorici 18y ago
      I think you are confusing political appointees with rank and file civil servants.
      - johns 18y ago
        I was a civil servant for awhile. Politics frequently got in the way of our department's work. Political initiatives would interrupt the ones we were working on and would frequently change based on whatever they felt like legislating that session or whomever was newly appointed. Not every department would be like that, but in a lot of cases there's too much outside influence by politicians to get any real work done.
        bokonist 18y ago
jcromartie 18y ago
I've been a full-time government contractor, and let me tell you: it gives you plenty of time to work on interesting side projects. But seriously, I hope that the Obama administration ratchets up the level of accountability when it comes to federal use of technology. There is so much redundancy that could be eliminated and, at the same time, so much more work that could be accomplished.
- mattmcknight 18y ago
  I don't have a problem with redundancy- it's like saying we don't need Microsoft and Apple. A little diversity goes a long way- it's the natural selection based approach. The real problem is it's not survival of the fittest, it's survival of the most connected. So many competing systems survive because of the government attitude of never admitting a mistake- ever. What I do have a problem with is the government's current obsession with buying COTS software and making me "integrate it" and claiming it's easier than doing it ourselves. Millions and millions down the drain on licenses for Sharepoint, Oracle, and other crap for which I can download better alternatives for free. Source code we can own as a country and share across agencies. It's criminal that it's so hard to make that work.
  - jcromartie 18y ago
    Wow, man. Are you my past self speaking from an alternate universe? Never admitting a mistake, buying/integrating before building, worthless COTS licensing and contracts and dead-end projects everywhere. Yup. That's exactly what I remember from gov't contracting 5 years ago!
sachinag 18y ago
If you like the idea of making something people will use, but are scared of working for the government, consider making a tool that the government has to take over. Here's the wonderful history of Carl Malamud doing this with the SEC EDGAR database and his current work on PACER: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/08/carl-malamud-ta.html http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/08/carl-malamud-ta.ht...
- byrneseyeview 18y ago
  From the article: You have already received rich rewards for the initial publication of these documents, and releasing this data back into the public domain would significantly grow your market and thus be an investment in your future. This seems really unlikely. It looks to me like Westlaw makes money by restricting access to information; I don't think they'd make more money if they had open access, though it would of course be very nice of them.
thomasmallen 18y ago
"Let me be clear, this is a catastrophic development for our country. When the private sector can no longer compete with the public sector, you know that society is on its way out." What? Of course the government outcompetes in terms of job security. I would too if I get a dollar for every three you made. But that's where the outcompetition ends. Private sector wins for efficiency, innovation, and general business competitiveness. Get a government job if you want to be financially fed from a tube til death, probably doing tedious, monotonous work. You can stay in your cage where Farmer feeds you on the clock; those of us who have a passion for what we do will continue to live in the wild. Related is PG's essay on the nature of the employee in a startup as opposed to in a corporation, although in this case the contrast is between the private and public sectors.
- old-gregg 18y ago
  What? ... Private sector wins for efficiency, innovation, and general business competitiveness. Wake up and look around: the government built first computers, your beloved Lisp, freaking Internet, not to mention sending man to space. Most universities are public. Innovation is so expensive that the private sector can't even dream of achieving anything of those magnitudes. Government, believe it or not, will be the one who solves the energy problem, will eventually cure cancer and AIDS and hopefully build a true AI, while entrepreneurial types will continue "throwing sheep" on facebooks. Inefficient? Yes. Non-innovative? No. And WTF is general business competitiveness?
  - thomasmallen 18y ago
    * I love Lisp? While I don't "love" any one language, most of my favorite projects were developed by open source communities. * Of course the government will do all of this: It's placed itself at the center of motion. Monopolization doesn't indicate superiority. * General business competitiveness: A business typically has to take other things that I didn't mention into account to be viable. I wasn't prepared to enumerate all of the differences between how a government institution and a for-profit business are run. It's no mystery that being beholden to paying customers or even a community that votes with its feet is more challenging than appealing to the many forces that drive government. And obviously, we're well past the point where American citizens throwing off the bridle is a possibility.
noodle 18y ago
i'd just like to point out that my state government has advertised for some agile rails jobs. "good" government jobs exist (assuming those were good jobs, i didn't apply or work in them so i can't say for sure).
bwd 18y ago
Given how deeply some of the state and local governments are in the hole in this financial crisis, has anyone given any serious thought as to how safe government pensions really are? The two possible scenarios that worry me the most about our current situation are commercial real estate problems being as bad as residential and the failure of a large state or municipality (e.g. Michigan or Detroit) to be able to meet its debt and pension obligations, which might set off a chain reaction in the municipal bond market of the magnitude that we saw in the commercial paper market after the failure of Lehman. Is there a backstop similar to PBGC available for public sector plans (couldn't find one with a few minutes of research) or is the Federal government the only possible source of help?
- yummyfajitas 18y ago
  Is there a backstop similar to PBGC available for public sector plans... Raising taxes. Besides, the feds will most likely bail the states likely to default (CA, MI, NJ) at least until 2013.
- jaredg 18y ago
  The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems -- in theory, the government agency makes its required contributions to the trust fund at the time the employee is paid. The bigger state and local pension systems are some of the largest institutional investors, so their fates are more tied to the market than their member governments. As with any other pension system, if a lot of the trust's holdings are in bonds, and those bonds end up in default, that would be a problem. The government pensions schemes are facing the same problem as Social Security -- people living and collecting benefits longer, health care costs going up (for those that include long term health benefits), and so on.
  - bwd 18y ago
    "The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems" Considering the fact that many defined benefit programs look about as safe as ticking time bombs, this doesn't particularly reassure me. In addition, there is the problem of actuarial assumptions. I remember a New York state actuary getting in trouble because he was being paid by the state labor unions earlier this year and came across this article while I was trying refresh my memory of the details: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php
ghshephard 18y ago
75th Percentile for Sr. Developers with a strong framework experience in the valley is $150K right now. Plus the options upside (Which should hopefully come through every third or fourth company you work for). Yes, during a death march, you do tend to stay working after 5:00 PM, and possibly even work on weekends. But, once you get into year three or four, a properly managed software shop should see those pushes for just three or four weeks a year, and it's not uncommon to see engineers putting in 30 hour work weeks the rest of the year. Of course the whole roller coaster of layoffs is still pretty valid - but if you are a good developer, jobs are pretty easy to come by once you've built up your network, and you can treat the off time as vacation. There is a reason why recruiters make $20K-25K (minimum) for tracking down high performance developers - they are hard to find. If you are an average developer, having to deal with 6 month to 2 year sabbaticals might suck, and I can see why the government job approach might make sense. My conclusion: Rock stars should look to being principal developers for private concerns, others should consider all their options based on their needs.
larrykubin 18y ago
Been there, done that. Worked at a government/university job for about 2 years. Very few people there cared about programming or software whatsoever. It's hard to stay motivated about anything when no one around you is fired up or cares about being there. Used a programming language similar to COBOL that made me want to bang my head against the wall. Features that would normally be trivial to implement were almost impossible. Took forever to get any code moved to production. Took about a year of meetings to do something as simple as installing MySQL. Version control = Excel Spreadsheets and folders. Any suggestion to use a new tool required a special committee, more meetings, etc. No one wanted to learn anything new. While you will have extra time to work on your own thing, you might lose your motivation and joy, and gradually become apathetic. I quit 2 years ago, and am doing much better as a freelancer.
- sofal 18y ago
  My experience working for a gigantic government contractor was just like you describe. I cannot emphasize enough how soul crushing it is to work in this kind of environment. You cannot just put in your hours, go home, and work on something interesting. The apathetic monotony is instilled into your being. It grows inside of you during the day, and you take it home with you. You can't just context switch from 8 hours of mental atrophy to a motivated and productive state. Sometimes I would come home and be useless for anything but lying down and staring at the ceiling. I only worked there for a year but I was turning into a zombie. If you go in thinking you can help rock the boat and make some changes, be careful. You may find that the changes happen to you instead. The dark side is powerful.
- enra 18y ago
  Yeah, I worked as well for goverment, or more specifically for military. Even most people that worked in the same department were civilans as well, they still weren't that qualified for the job(or cared). I took like 5 years of meetings or committees to actually launch a website, and you were tied to vendors that were selected for the job like 10years before, and even it was clear that they didn't do a very good job, no-one cared or wanted to change. I only lasted a year there, I was too horrified to actually becoming one of them. So I would guess that you can't say that goverment job is always better than private, or other way around. In both cases you might want to check out the environment beforehand. There actually are some interesting jobs that only exist in public sector and some of them are quite highly competative.
nolanbrown23 18y ago
When you don't love what you do, you work for the government. I care about my retirement too but if that is your end goal, then you clearly don't care about the work you do. All you want to do is just go to work, come home, retire and die.
- mrtron 18y ago
  Absolutely disagree with the generalization. A friend is an auditor for the gov. He routinely gets offers for 5x salary from clients he is auditing (illegally). Why does he do it? Because he loves what he does. He feels he is doing something necessary and honourable for his country.
  - zzzmarcus 18y ago
    I bet if the offers were legal he'd be out in a second flat. There just can't be much joy in being a tax collector and if there is some anomaly and he does truly enjoy it, it's exactly that, an anomaly.
    - mrtron 18y ago
      No...he isn't a 'tax collector' - he is a head auditor for a region of the country. He has caught some Superman 3 style schemes at major institutions. He really is doing a great service because he is incredibly smart and hard working and chooses to use those skills in the public sector. What would making more money provide him? He has his dream job and job security.
  - nolanbrown23 18y ago
    Sorry, my generalization was meant to be specific to technical jobs in the government (with the exception of NASA and DARPA). While I don't dispute the auditor is performing a vital function for the government and loves his job, the role of a technical person and auditor cannot be compared. In his case the government supplies the auditor with more than just a salary and security, they provide him power that can't be had elsewhere. For a technical person, the government is the hole you go into to die because you no longer love what you do.
patio11 18y ago
A government job is a wonderful thing for folks who want to start their own business. The hours are short and the work won't mentally exhaust you, and the pay will put a roof over your head and food on the table. After you get home at 5:30 you can spend a few hours working on your side project. Then if you quit 2-3 years down the road, everyone will be better off: you'll have a job you'll enjoy, and the government will have gotten 2-3 years of labor out of you for a song and won't have to pay your absurdly generous pension benefits.
kingkongrevenge 18y ago
> I shall be 63, my birthday, and retire with Social Security and a very secure pension This guy is remarkably naive about the long term solvency of the government.
- mgornick 18y ago
  Either that or his few hundred a month pension might buy him a gum ball at the rate the US is printing money.
  - eru 18y ago
    Aren't government pensions inflation indexed?
    - kingkongrevenge 18y ago
      The CPI and GDP deflator already dramatically understate inflation. You think they won't do whatever the hell they want with the index when they have little choice financially?
  - jmtame 18y ago
    Maybe two gumballs if he's lucky.
  - dgabriel 18y ago
    I bet he's doing better with his government pension than he would be with a 401k right now.
jmtame 18y ago
The way this is written disgusts me. I feel like a salesman is telling me to jump off a cliff because he personally values retirement, a 9-5 job, and safe/comfortable pensions. I'm sorry but not everyone on this forum shares your ideologies. Not everyone is in it for money, comfort, or security. It requires sacrifice to do something meaningful with your life sometimes. If you can't pull an 80 hour week, then startups are definitely not for you. No offense or anything meant by this response. I'm just saying, I felt like the writer was trying to impose his beliefs on me. In an annoying sort of way.
- gaius 18y ago
  Read the article to the end. He concludes by stating that if all this is possible, the economy is fucked.
  - jmtame 18y ago
    Right, it's such a bad thing, yet he encourages everyone to do it. That makes sense.
    - gaius 18y ago
      That's a situation created by perverse incentives.
pmorici 18y ago
Ugh, that's all I have to say. This is exactly the kind of person the government doesn't need working for it; ie: someone who's only concern is their own job security. The government needs employees who are selfless and would readily set their bosses chair on fire if it meant doing the right thing by the American people.
- deleted 18y ago
  [deleted]
- pg 18y ago
  The government needs employees who are selfless and would readily set their bosses chair on fire if it meant doing the right thing by the American people. Might it not be better if these people worked in the private sector, where their efforts could have more effect?
  - pmorici 18y ago
    Sure, but, someone has to work for the government. When the government contractors come calling whom would you rather have sitting on the other side of the table. Some fool who's only goal is to get through the day with the least amount of hassle or someone who isn't afraid to evaluate an idea on it's merits and call BS if that's what it is. That isn't to say that that person wouldn't be making some sort of personal sacrifice in terms of either salary or work environment. I mean, doesn't it worry anyone else that if all the countries best and brightest minds are out there building the next Twitter we might have the B team working on things that have a far greater chance of effecting us all in the long term?
- bigbigwatch 18y ago
  [url=http://www.rs-game.com http://www.rs-game.com]Runescape Accounts[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com]Runescape Powerleveling[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-club.com http://www.runescape-club.com]Runescape Money[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-mall.com http://www.runescape-mall.com]Runescape Gold[/url] [url=http://www.salerunescapeitems.com http://www.salerunescapeitems.com]Runescape Items[/url] [url=http://www.rsluck.com http://www.rsluck.com]Runescape Equipment[/url] [url=http://www.rs-game.com http://www.rs-game.com]RS Accounts[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com]RS Powerleveling[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-club.com http://www.runescape-club.com]RS Money[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-mall.com http://www.runescape-mall.com]RS Gold[/url] [url=http://www.salerunescapeitems.com http://www.salerunescapeitems.com]RS Items[/url] [url=http://www.rsluck.com http://www.rsluck.com]RS Equipment[/url] [url=http://www.forum.rs-game.com http://www.forum.rs-game.com]runescape forum[/url]
raffi 18y ago
Government job isn't all bad. For folks like us there are many opportunities. Do you want graduate school paid for? Scholarship for service is a great program. I know the lab I was at would give civilians the options to spend 2 years in residence working towards their PhD with their civilian pay. Granted 2 years isn't enough time to do the whole thing, but you can get courses paid for (and the time to take them) while working. Sometimes taking the courses is considered part of your job. Most of my MSc was paid for this way. Government benefits are great--the BS the gov employees have to deal with is what makes it painful. Depending where you are at, there is an opportunity to make an impact and do very interesting work. There are also entrepreneurial opportunities in the government: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=395714 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=395714
keefe 18y ago
shudder... talk about being a cog in the machine. Unless you're shooting for an early one, working for retirement just makes no sense. Just becoming steadily more lazy until I die? Whatever it is you are wanting to do after you retire, find a way to do it now.
hualibaobao 18y ago
[SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replicashandbag.com/ http://www.replicashandbag.com/]Replica Handbag[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/ http://www.hotwatchshop.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.watches-replicas.com/ http://www.watches-replicas.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/ http://www.sales-watches.net/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replica-watch-shopping.com/ http://www.replica-watch-shopping.com/]Replica Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.watchespage.net/ http://www.watchespage.net/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replica031.com/ http://www.replica031.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.fashion163.com/ http://www.fashion163.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/swatch-watches.html http://www.sales-watches.net/swatch-watches.html]Swatch Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Accutron-Watches.html http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Accutron-Watches.html]Fake Accutron Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://citizen-watches.pxhelp.com/ http://citizen-watches.pxhelp.com/]Citizen Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.aaa-replica-watch.com/Replica_Cartier.html http://www.aaa-replica-watch.com/Replica_Cartier.html]Replica Cartier[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.watches-replicas.com/concord-watches.html http://www.watches-replicas.com/concord-watches.html]Concord Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/audemars-piguet-watches.html http://www.sales-watches.net/audemars-piguet-watches.html]Audemars Pigue Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://vacheron-constantin.pxhelp.com/ http://vacheron-constantin.pxhelp.com/]Replica Vacheron Constantin Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://philip-stein.watches-collection.com/ http://philip-stein.watches-collection.com/]Philip Stein Replica Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.wholesale-watches.org/vacheron-constantin-watches.html http://www.wholesale-watches.org/vacheron-constantin-watches...]Vacheron Constantin Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.fashion163.com/Seiko.html http://www.fashion163.com/Seiko.html]Replica Seiko Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Gucci-Watches.html http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Gucci-Watches.html]Gucci Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://baume-mercier.watches-collection.com/ http://baume-mercier.watches-collection.com/]Baume & Mercier Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE]
kiplinger 18y ago
f government jobs. This guy is a loser.
kiplinger 18y ago
This guy is part of the problem, a loser who wants to bloat the system. What will this idiot do when the taxpayers revolt and he loses his cush job? Bitch and moan about "budget cuts" like all the other hacks.
viggity 18y ago
I had a government gig for 12 months and I wanted to gouge my eyes out. Just because the author worked 80 hour weeks and now works a precise 40 does NOT mean you should work for the government. If you thought private sector bureaucracy is bad, just wait until you work for the gov. Plus working for the government quadruples the chances that you'll be working with completely lazy, incompetent morons (not exactly the kind of people I want running my health care, but that is a whole other ball of wax) Avoid the government like the plague. If you private sector gig asks you to work in a manner you don't want to, find another company, but don't think about the gov.
mattmaroon 18y ago
What is this 'pension' thing he speaks of? It sounds much like my IRA, except it can somehow be lost.
neilk 18y ago
I've worked at a government job and it was one of the worst experiences of my professional career. As a summer student, I outperformed the guy who had that job the other 10.5 months of the year. And still I have never been paid so much for doing so little. But I've also seen exactly how meaningless the private sector can be. While it may satisfy my desire for fast-paced, stimulating work, ultimately a lot of it is, well, stupid. The fact that you can get to work with some exciting new tech obscures the fact that 50% of projects will fail, and of those, even fewer will ever matter to anyone or even bring a smile to anyone's face. And many of the ones that do succeed are often patently immoral, or at best amoral. Meanwhile, capitalism today is run for the benefit of managers. Even if you're lucky enough to work for a successful company, expect the CEO and VPs to reap the lion's share of the rewards, and fire you (or your friends) at Wall Street's whim. I guess I'm saying that I can see this guy's point of view. Gee-whiz tech is one thing, but stability does matter, and some parts of the government are doing good work. I know a woman who makes a good, stable living generating stats out of the census, and also creating web tools for people to do the same. Consequently she's doing something good for Americans of all kinds, the scale creates interesting challenges, and there's even something to look forward to after it's all over. Can you imagine it? Right now I have a great job, but even we can't completely escape the relentless stupidity that is the software business today.

25 points by bokonist 18y ago

This might be the answer to a previous post... http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=394609 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=394609

Dilpil 18y ago

Unless of course you actually want to produce quality software.

aswanson 18y ago
Like what, another buggy facebook app or social site? The software running on the FAA flight control systems, DOD command and comms systems, and satellite navigations outclass pretty much anything I've seen from the startup space in terms of quality.
- alex_c 18y ago
  What percentage - by whatever measurement you want, lines of code, man hours, whatever - do those make up of all software written by government organizations?
- sofal 18y ago
  The software running on the FAA flight control systems, DOD command and comms systems, and satellite navigations outclass pretty much anything I've seen from the startup space in terms of quality. It sounds glorious, doesn't it? I wrote software for submarines. The innovation is outsourced and is done long before these systems start development. It's all about integration and stifling quality control. More effort is spent on generating paperwork than on developing the system. A corporate government contractor will bend over to get a contract, letting the customer dictate the details of the design (for example: specifying that CORBA must be used for all inter-process communication). The "quality" of the software comes from taking horrible code and beating it into submission with QA over the course of months. The user interfaces that come out of this process make me pity the poor sailors. Coming up with these impressive technologies and then integrating them into real systems are two completely different activities, separated temporally by about a decade. The glory rests with the former only.
  - dgabriel 18y ago
    Did you work for NUWC? I think they use BBN for most of their contract needs, and BBN is pretty quality conscious.
- olefoo 18y ago
  Most of that is written by contractors, not government employees. And for most startups the money they could spend training programmers and investing in methods and process is better spent getting something, anything, out there, on the street producing revenue.

matthavener 18y ago

depends on what you really want out of a job. if you want security and less stress gov't is the way to go. but you're also going to find people that don't care about quality, "doing it right", the latest technologies, learning, working hard, or sometimes working at all. you deal with the biggest bureaucracy in america... working for the gov't seems to be the opposite of the values purported by hn posts

Devilboy 18y ago
Exactly why you SHOULD consider a government job. We need people willing to rock the boat from the inside if we want things to change.
- johns 18y ago
  Except for that its exceedingly difficult to accomplish anything of worth without some political influence outside of your sections control. Doesn't matter how much buy in you can get from your management, you're still in the end at the mercy of someone else's political whims.
  - pmorici 18y ago
    I think you are confusing political appointees with rank and file civil servants.
    - johns 18y ago
      I was a civil servant for awhile. Politics frequently got in the way of our department's work. Political initiatives would interrupt the ones we were working on and would frequently change based on whatever they felt like legislating that session or whomever was newly appointed. Not every department would be like that, but in a lot of cases there's too much outside influence by politicians to get any real work done.
      - bokonist 18y ago

jcromartie 18y ago

I've been a full-time government contractor, and let me tell you: it gives you plenty of time to work on interesting side projects. But seriously, I hope that the Obama administration ratchets up the level of accountability when it comes to federal use of technology. There is so much redundancy that could be eliminated and, at the same time, so much more work that could be accomplished.

mattmcknight 18y ago
I don't have a problem with redundancy- it's like saying we don't need Microsoft and Apple. A little diversity goes a long way- it's the natural selection based approach. The real problem is it's not survival of the fittest, it's survival of the most connected. So many competing systems survive because of the government attitude of never admitting a mistake- ever. What I do have a problem with is the government's current obsession with buying COTS software and making me "integrate it" and claiming it's easier than doing it ourselves. Millions and millions down the drain on licenses for Sharepoint, Oracle, and other crap for which I can download better alternatives for free. Source code we can own as a country and share across agencies. It's criminal that it's so hard to make that work.
- jcromartie 18y ago
  Wow, man. Are you my past self speaking from an alternate universe? Never admitting a mistake, buying/integrating before building, worthless COTS licensing and contracts and dead-end projects everywhere. Yup. That's exactly what I remember from gov't contracting 5 years ago!

sachinag 18y ago

If you like the idea of making something people will use, but are scared of working for the government, consider making a tool that the government has to take over. Here's the wonderful history of Carl Malamud doing this with the SEC EDGAR database and his current work on PACER: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/08/carl-malamud-ta.html http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/08/carl-malamud-ta.ht...

byrneseyeview 18y ago
From the article: You have already received rich rewards for the initial publication of these documents, and releasing this data back into the public domain would significantly grow your market and thus be an investment in your future. This seems really unlikely. It looks to me like Westlaw makes money by restricting access to information; I don't think they'd make more money if they had open access, though it would of course be very nice of them.

thomasmallen 18y ago

"Let me be clear, this is a catastrophic development for our country. When the private sector can no longer compete with the public sector, you know that society is on its way out." What? Of course the government outcompetes in terms of job security. I would too if I get a dollar for every three you made. But that's where the outcompetition ends. Private sector wins for efficiency, innovation, and general business competitiveness. Get a government job if you want to be financially fed from a tube til death, probably doing tedious, monotonous work. You can stay in your cage where Farmer feeds you on the clock; those of us who have a passion for what we do will continue to live in the wild. Related is PG's essay on the nature of the employee in a startup as opposed to in a corporation, although in this case the contrast is between the private and public sectors.

old-gregg 18y ago
What? ... Private sector wins for efficiency, innovation, and general business competitiveness. Wake up and look around: the government built first computers, your beloved Lisp, freaking Internet, not to mention sending man to space. Most universities are public. Innovation is so expensive that the private sector can't even dream of achieving anything of those magnitudes. Government, believe it or not, will be the one who solves the energy problem, will eventually cure cancer and AIDS and hopefully build a true AI, while entrepreneurial types will continue "throwing sheep" on facebooks. Inefficient? Yes. Non-innovative? No. And WTF is general business competitiveness?
- thomasmallen 18y ago
  * I love Lisp? While I don't "love" any one language, most of my favorite projects were developed by open source communities. * Of course the government will do all of this: It's placed itself at the center of motion. Monopolization doesn't indicate superiority. * General business competitiveness: A business typically has to take other things that I didn't mention into account to be viable. I wasn't prepared to enumerate all of the differences between how a government institution and a for-profit business are run. It's no mystery that being beholden to paying customers or even a community that votes with its feet is more challenging than appealing to the many forces that drive government. And obviously, we're well past the point where American citizens throwing off the bridle is a possibility.

noodle 18y ago

i'd just like to point out that my state government has advertised for some agile rails jobs. "good" government jobs exist (assuming those were good jobs, i didn't apply or work in them so i can't say for sure).

bwd 18y ago

Given how deeply some of the state and local governments are in the hole in this financial crisis, has anyone given any serious thought as to how safe government pensions really are? The two possible scenarios that worry me the most about our current situation are commercial real estate problems being as bad as residential and the failure of a large state or municipality (e.g. Michigan or Detroit) to be able to meet its debt and pension obligations, which might set off a chain reaction in the municipal bond market of the magnitude that we saw in the commercial paper market after the failure of Lehman. Is there a backstop similar to PBGC available for public sector plans (couldn't find one with a few minutes of research) or is the Federal government the only possible source of help?

yummyfajitas 18y ago
Is there a backstop similar to PBGC available for public sector plans... Raising taxes. Besides, the feds will most likely bail the states likely to default (CA, MI, NJ) at least until 2013.
jaredg 18y ago
The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems -- in theory, the government agency makes its required contributions to the trust fund at the time the employee is paid. The bigger state and local pension systems are some of the largest institutional investors, so their fates are more tied to the market than their member governments. As with any other pension system, if a lot of the trust's holdings are in bonds, and those bonds end up in default, that would be a problem. The government pensions schemes are facing the same problem as Social Security -- people living and collecting benefits longer, health care costs going up (for those that include long term health benefits), and so on.
- bwd 18y ago
  "The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems" Considering the fact that many defined benefit programs look about as safe as ticking time bombs, this doesn't particularly reassure me. In addition, there is the problem of actuarial assumptions. I remember a New York state actuary getting in trouble because he was being paid by the state labor unions earlier this year and came across this article while I was trying refresh my memory of the details: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php

ghshephard 18y ago

75th Percentile for Sr. Developers with a strong framework experience in the valley is $150K right now. Plus the options upside (Which should hopefully come through every third or fourth company you work for). Yes, during a death march, you do tend to stay working after 5:00 PM, and possibly even work on weekends. But, once you get into year three or four, a properly managed software shop should see those pushes for just three or four weeks a year, and it's not uncommon to see engineers putting in 30 hour work weeks the rest of the year. Of course the whole roller coaster of layoffs is still pretty valid - but if you are a good developer, jobs are pretty easy to come by once you've built up your network, and you can treat the off time as vacation. There is a reason why recruiters make $20K-25K (minimum) for tracking down high performance developers - they are hard to find. If you are an average developer, having to deal with 6 month to 2 year sabbaticals might suck, and I can see why the government job approach might make sense. My conclusion: Rock stars should look to being principal developers for private concerns, others should consider all their options based on their needs.

larrykubin 18y ago

Been there, done that. Worked at a government/university job for about 2 years. Very few people there cared about programming or software whatsoever. It's hard to stay motivated about anything when no one around you is fired up or cares about being there. Used a programming language similar to COBOL that made me want to bang my head against the wall. Features that would normally be trivial to implement were almost impossible. Took forever to get any code moved to production. Took about a year of meetings to do something as simple as installing MySQL. Version control = Excel Spreadsheets and folders. Any suggestion to use a new tool required a special committee, more meetings, etc. No one wanted to learn anything new. While you will have extra time to work on your own thing, you might lose your motivation and joy, and gradually become apathetic. I quit 2 years ago, and am doing much better as a freelancer.

sofal 18y ago
My experience working for a gigantic government contractor was just like you describe. I cannot emphasize enough how soul crushing it is to work in this kind of environment. You cannot just put in your hours, go home, and work on something interesting. The apathetic monotony is instilled into your being. It grows inside of you during the day, and you take it home with you. You can't just context switch from 8 hours of mental atrophy to a motivated and productive state. Sometimes I would come home and be useless for anything but lying down and staring at the ceiling. I only worked there for a year but I was turning into a zombie. If you go in thinking you can help rock the boat and make some changes, be careful. You may find that the changes happen to you instead. The dark side is powerful.
enra 18y ago
Yeah, I worked as well for goverment, or more specifically for military. Even most people that worked in the same department were civilans as well, they still weren't that qualified for the job(or cared). I took like 5 years of meetings or committees to actually launch a website, and you were tied to vendors that were selected for the job like 10years before, and even it was clear that they didn't do a very good job, no-one cared or wanted to change. I only lasted a year there, I was too horrified to actually becoming one of them. So I would guess that you can't say that goverment job is always better than private, or other way around. In both cases you might want to check out the environment beforehand. There actually are some interesting jobs that only exist in public sector and some of them are quite highly competative.

nolanbrown23 18y ago

When you don't love what you do, you work for the government. I care about my retirement too but if that is your end goal, then you clearly don't care about the work you do. All you want to do is just go to work, come home, retire and die.

mrtron 18y ago
Absolutely disagree with the generalization. A friend is an auditor for the gov. He routinely gets offers for 5x salary from clients he is auditing (illegally). Why does he do it? Because he loves what he does. He feels he is doing something necessary and honourable for his country.
- zzzmarcus 18y ago
  I bet if the offers were legal he'd be out in a second flat. There just can't be much joy in being a tax collector and if there is some anomaly and he does truly enjoy it, it's exactly that, an anomaly.
  - mrtron 18y ago
    No...he isn't a 'tax collector' - he is a head auditor for a region of the country. He has caught some Superman 3 style schemes at major institutions. He really is doing a great service because he is incredibly smart and hard working and chooses to use those skills in the public sector. What would making more money provide him? He has his dream job and job security.
- nolanbrown23 18y ago
  Sorry, my generalization was meant to be specific to technical jobs in the government (with the exception of NASA and DARPA). While I don't dispute the auditor is performing a vital function for the government and loves his job, the role of a technical person and auditor cannot be compared. In his case the government supplies the auditor with more than just a salary and security, they provide him power that can't be had elsewhere. For a technical person, the government is the hole you go into to die because you no longer love what you do.

patio11 18y ago

A government job is a wonderful thing for folks who want to start their own business. The hours are short and the work won't mentally exhaust you, and the pay will put a roof over your head and food on the table. After you get home at 5:30 you can spend a few hours working on your side project. Then if you quit 2-3 years down the road, everyone will be better off: you'll have a job you'll enjoy, and the government will have gotten 2-3 years of labor out of you for a song and won't have to pay your absurdly generous pension benefits.

kingkongrevenge 18y ago

> I shall be 63, my birthday, and retire with Social Security and a very secure pension This guy is remarkably naive about the long term solvency of the government.

mgornick 18y ago
Either that or his few hundred a month pension might buy him a gum ball at the rate the US is printing money.
- eru 18y ago
  Aren't government pensions inflation indexed?
  - kingkongrevenge 18y ago
    The CPI and GDP deflator already dramatically understate inflation. You think they won't do whatever the hell they want with the index when they have little choice financially?
- jmtame 18y ago
  Maybe two gumballs if he's lucky.
- dgabriel 18y ago
  I bet he's doing better with his government pension than he would be with a 401k right now.

jmtame 18y ago

The way this is written disgusts me. I feel like a salesman is telling me to jump off a cliff because he personally values retirement, a 9-5 job, and safe/comfortable pensions. I'm sorry but not everyone on this forum shares your ideologies. Not everyone is in it for money, comfort, or security. It requires sacrifice to do something meaningful with your life sometimes. If you can't pull an 80 hour week, then startups are definitely not for you. No offense or anything meant by this response. I'm just saying, I felt like the writer was trying to impose his beliefs on me. In an annoying sort of way.

gaius 18y ago
Read the article to the end. He concludes by stating that if all this is possible, the economy is fucked.
- jmtame 18y ago
  Right, it's such a bad thing, yet he encourages everyone to do it. That makes sense.
  - gaius 18y ago
    That's a situation created by perverse incentives.

pmorici 18y ago

Ugh, that's all I have to say. This is exactly the kind of person the government doesn't need working for it; ie: someone who's only concern is their own job security. The government needs employees who are selfless and would readily set their bosses chair on fire if it meant doing the right thing by the American people.

deleted 18y ago
[deleted]
pg 18y ago
The government needs employees who are selfless and would readily set their bosses chair on fire if it meant doing the right thing by the American people. Might it not be better if these people worked in the private sector, where their efforts could have more effect?
- pmorici 18y ago
  Sure, but, someone has to work for the government. When the government contractors come calling whom would you rather have sitting on the other side of the table. Some fool who's only goal is to get through the day with the least amount of hassle or someone who isn't afraid to evaluate an idea on it's merits and call BS if that's what it is. That isn't to say that that person wouldn't be making some sort of personal sacrifice in terms of either salary or work environment. I mean, doesn't it worry anyone else that if all the countries best and brightest minds are out there building the next Twitter we might have the B team working on things that have a far greater chance of effecting us all in the long term?
bigbigwatch 18y ago
[url=http://www.rs-game.com http://www.rs-game.com]Runescape Accounts[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com]Runescape Powerleveling[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-club.com http://www.runescape-club.com]Runescape Money[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-mall.com http://www.runescape-mall.com]Runescape Gold[/url] [url=http://www.salerunescapeitems.com http://www.salerunescapeitems.com]Runescape Items[/url] [url=http://www.rsluck.com http://www.rsluck.com]Runescape Equipment[/url] [url=http://www.rs-game.com http://www.rs-game.com]RS Accounts[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com http://www.runescape-power-leveling.com]RS Powerleveling[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-club.com http://www.runescape-club.com]RS Money[/url] [url=http://www.runescape-mall.com http://www.runescape-mall.com]RS Gold[/url] [url=http://www.salerunescapeitems.com http://www.salerunescapeitems.com]RS Items[/url] [url=http://www.rsluck.com http://www.rsluck.com]RS Equipment[/url] [url=http://www.forum.rs-game.com http://www.forum.rs-game.com]runescape forum[/url]

raffi 18y ago

Government job isn't all bad. For folks like us there are many opportunities. Do you want graduate school paid for? Scholarship for service is a great program. I know the lab I was at would give civilians the options to spend 2 years in residence working towards their PhD with their civilian pay. Granted 2 years isn't enough time to do the whole thing, but you can get courses paid for (and the time to take them) while working. Sometimes taking the courses is considered part of your job. Most of my MSc was paid for this way. Government benefits are great--the BS the gov employees have to deal with is what makes it painful. Depending where you are at, there is an opportunity to make an impact and do very interesting work. There are also entrepreneurial opportunities in the government: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=395714 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=395714

keefe 18y ago

shudder... talk about being a cog in the machine. Unless you're shooting for an early one, working for retirement just makes no sense. Just becoming steadily more lazy until I die? Whatever it is you are wanting to do after you retire, find a way to do it now.

hualibaobao 18y ago

[SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replicashandbag.com/ http://www.replicashandbag.com/]Replica Handbag[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/ http://www.hotwatchshop.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.watches-replicas.com/ http://www.watches-replicas.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/ http://www.sales-watches.net/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replica-watch-shopping.com/ http://www.replica-watch-shopping.com/]Replica Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.watchespage.net/ http://www.watchespage.net/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.replica031.com/ http://www.replica031.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][URL=http://www.fashion163.com/ http://www.fashion163.com/]Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/swatch-watches.html http://www.sales-watches.net/swatch-watches.html]Swatch Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Accutron-Watches.html http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Accutron-Watches.html]Fake Accutron Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://citizen-watches.pxhelp.com/ http://citizen-watches.pxhelp.com/]Citizen Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.aaa-replica-watch.com/Replica_Cartier.html http://www.aaa-replica-watch.com/Replica_Cartier.html]Replica Cartier[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.watches-replicas.com/concord-watches.html http://www.watches-replicas.com/concord-watches.html]Concord Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.sales-watches.net/audemars-piguet-watches.html http://www.sales-watches.net/audemars-piguet-watches.html]Audemars Pigue Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://vacheron-constantin.pxhelp.com/ http://vacheron-constantin.pxhelp.com/]Replica Vacheron Constantin Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://philip-stein.watches-collection.com/ http://philip-stein.watches-collection.com/]Philip Stein Replica Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.wholesale-watches.org/vacheron-constantin-watches.html http://www.wholesale-watches.org/vacheron-constantin-watches...]Vacheron Constantin Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.fashion163.com/Seiko.html http://www.fashion163.com/Seiko.html]Replica Seiko Watch[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Gucci-Watches.html http://www.hotwatchshop.com/Gucci-Watches.html]Gucci Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][B][URL=http://baume-mercier.watches-collection.com/ http://baume-mercier.watches-collection.com/]Baume & Mercier Replica Watches[/URL] [/B][/SIZE]

kiplinger 18y ago

f government jobs. This guy is a loser.

kiplinger 18y ago

This guy is part of the problem, a loser who wants to bloat the system. What will this idiot do when the taxpayers revolt and he loses his cush job? Bitch and moan about "budget cuts" like all the other hacks.

viggity 18y ago

I had a government gig for 12 months and I wanted to gouge my eyes out. Just because the author worked 80 hour weeks and now works a precise 40 does NOT mean you should work for the government. If you thought private sector bureaucracy is bad, just wait until you work for the gov. Plus working for the government quadruples the chances that you'll be working with completely lazy, incompetent morons (not exactly the kind of people I want running my health care, but that is a whole other ball of wax) Avoid the government like the plague. If you private sector gig asks you to work in a manner you don't want to, find another company, but don't think about the gov.

mattmaroon 18y ago

What is this 'pension' thing he speaks of? It sounds much like my IRA, except it can somehow be lost.

neilk 18y ago

I've worked at a government job and it was one of the worst experiences of my professional career. As a summer student, I outperformed the guy who had that job the other 10.5 months of the year. And still I have never been paid so much for doing so little. But I've also seen exactly how meaningless the private sector can be. While it may satisfy my desire for fast-paced, stimulating work, ultimately a lot of it is, well, stupid. The fact that you can get to work with some exciting new tech obscures the fact that 50% of projects will fail, and of those, even fewer will ever matter to anyone or even bring a smile to anyone's face. And many of the ones that do succeed are often patently immoral, or at best amoral. Meanwhile, capitalism today is run for the benefit of managers. Even if you're lucky enough to work for a successful company, expect the CEO and VPs to reap the lion's share of the rewards, and fire you (or your friends) at Wall Street's whim. I guess I'm saying that I can see this guy's point of view. Gee-whiz tech is one thing, but stability does matter, and some parts of the government are doing good work. I know a woman who makes a good, stable living generating stats out of the census, and also creating web tools for people to do the same. Consequently she's doing something good for Americans of all kinds, the scale creates interesting challenges, and there's even something to look forward to after it's all over. Can you imagine it? Right now I have a great job, but even we can't completely escape the relentless stupidity that is the software business today.