4 ms·
Wouldn't C# be the most reasonable option if so? Maybe they did the math and the .NET ecosystem is much more expensive than Java? Even ignoring MS cost, most 3r
by lunfard000 3y ago
Wouldn't C# be the most reasonable option if so? Maybe they did the math and the .NET ecosystem is much more expensive than Java? Even ignoring MS cost, most 3rd party libraries on .NET usually require a license.
- neonsunset 3y agoWhat kind of libraries, given the tasks solved by Walmart, do you have in mind?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- lunfard000 3y agoI dont know their needs, but last time I tried to do a computer-vision project on C#, all libraries in Nugets where shitty wrappers for cloud solutions or just paid libraries (last update to OpenCV is 7 years old).
- neonsunset 3y agoUsing bindings to C++ libraries is likely to yield better experience. C# has really good interop API (P/Invoke). I don't have experience with machine vision but here's an example of a speech2text library that integrates whisper.cpp in an idiomatic way: https://github.com/sandrohanea/whisper.net https://github.com/sandrohanea/whisper.net There are many good community projects with code quality way higher than your average enterprise SDK with layers upon layers of abstractions and allocations. Finding them is the same as with most other languages like Rust or TS.
- arrjayh 3y agoDo they really? that seems difficult to navigate