4 ms·
My point is, you're being filmed in most all public spaces all the time. Some rando filming doesn't really change the amount of privacy you do or don't have. E
by mmh0000 3y ago
My point is, you're being filmed in most all public spaces all the time. Some rando filming doesn't really change the amount of privacy you do or don't have.
EDIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveillance_camera_man_cant_seem_to_find_a/ https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveill...
- g-b-r 3y agoOh so Americans do care about being filmed in public xD Surveillance Camera Man might be my new hero, if his goals where the ones I hope. Although I might want to turn away the surveillance cameras as well, some rando filming could be worse for: - uploading the video to YouTube - sometimes reaching places that are not really covered with cameras - and in the Surveillance Camera Man case specifically, for it being more likely that the video be used for nefarious purposes
- ShaolinTrooper 3y agoThere's a difference. CCTV footages aren't used for profit and it will not be published to the public. Brendan's live video is used for profit and is published for everyone to see.
- mmh0000 3y agocctv footage gets published all the time for profit https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+camera+footage https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+...
- ShaolinTrooper 3y agoThen send me a link of a CCTV camera around your local mall or train station. They only publish it if it will be used for the news / evidence of a crime. You mean to say CCTV footages in its entire duration gets profit?