ShaolinTrooper

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   Then send me a link of a CCTV camera around your local mall or train station. They only publish it if it will be used for the news / evidence of a crime. You mean to say CCTV footages in its entire duration gets profit?
2. 2.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   That was the easiest way for a very peaceful conversation but the Chinese nationals looked like they wanted smoke and fought for what they thought was right. It escalated because Brendan retaliated and we ended up with this mess.
3. 3.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   I've watched the video again. Brendan tried to get the Chinese woman to "dance" and made a remark that British girls are more fun which was really inappropriate and disrespectful when the Chinese woman respectfully disagreed
4. 4.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   If that Chinese dude were to do that here in Manila Philippines, he would get beat up real good. He's lucky to be in an good country and not some 3rd world country where their so-called "rights" are spat on by the public.
5. 5.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   There's a difference. CCTV footages aren't used for profit and it will not be published to the public. Brendan's live video is used for profit and is published for everyone to see.
6. 6.▲
   by ShaolinTrooper 3y ago

   The thing is that the Chinese people didn't want to be filmed because they knew it will be published on Youtube for revenue and that's what they didn't want. They allow people to film on a normal basis because it will not be