5 ms·

That's already what your assumption should be.. don't go out in the public if you don't like to be filmed. We have freedom laws specifically for this so I am fa

That's already what your assumption should be.. don't go out in the public if you don't like to be filmed. We have freedom laws specifically for this so I am failing to see your point for this? Public spaces are _public_ .

g-b-r 3y ago
You fail to see how not going out in public is a reduction of freedom?
- mmh0000 3y ago
  How do you feel about all the surveillance cameras permeating society?
  - g-b-r 3y ago
    Extremely bad Were you born after they spread, by any chance?
    - mmh0000 3y ago
      My point is, you're being filmed in most all public spaces all the time. Some rando filming doesn't really change the amount of privacy you do or don't have. EDIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveillance_camera_man_cant_seem_to_find_a/ https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveill...
      - g-b-r 3y ago
        Oh so Americans do care about being filmed in public xD Surveillance Camera Man might be my new hero, if his goals where the ones I hope. Although I might want to turn away the surveillance cameras as well, some rando filming could be worse for: - uploading the video to YouTube - sometimes reaching places that are not really covered with cameras - and in the Surveillance Camera Man case specifically, for it being more likely that the video be used for nefarious purposes
      - ShaolinTrooper 3y ago
        There's a difference. CCTV footages aren't used for profit and it will not be published to the public. Brendan's live video is used for profit and is published for everyone to see.
        mmh0000 3y ago
        cctv footage gets published all the time for profit https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+camera+footage https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+...
        ShaolinTrooper 3y ago
        Then send me a link of a CCTV camera around your local mall or train station. They only publish it if it will be used for the news / evidence of a crime. You mean to say CCTV footages in its entire duration gets profit?

g-b-r 3y ago

You fail to see how not going out in public is a reduction of freedom?

mmh0000 3y ago
How do you feel about all the surveillance cameras permeating society?
- g-b-r 3y ago
  Extremely bad Were you born after they spread, by any chance?
  - mmh0000 3y ago
    My point is, you're being filmed in most all public spaces all the time. Some rando filming doesn't really change the amount of privacy you do or don't have. EDIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveillance_camera_man_cant_seem_to_find_a/ https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/thrxuy/iso_surveill...
    - g-b-r 3y ago
      Oh so Americans do care about being filmed in public xD Surveillance Camera Man might be my new hero, if his goals where the ones I hope. Although I might want to turn away the surveillance cameras as well, some rando filming could be worse for: - uploading the video to YouTube - sometimes reaching places that are not really covered with cameras - and in the Surveillance Camera Man case specifically, for it being more likely that the video be used for nefarious purposes
    - ShaolinTrooper 3y ago
      There's a difference. CCTV footages aren't used for profit and it will not be published to the public. Brendan's live video is used for profit and is published for everyone to see.
      - mmh0000 3y ago
        cctv footage gets published all the time for profit https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+camera+footage https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=security+...
        ShaolinTrooper 3y ago
        Then send me a link of a CCTV camera around your local mall or train station. They only publish it if it will be used for the news / evidence of a crime. You mean to say CCTV footages in its entire duration gets profit?